L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

pre-trial-report

pre-trial-report

Drafts objective pre-trial reports for insurance carriers in personal injury defense litigation. Covers liability analysis, damages evaluation, venue/jury analysis, cost projections, expert testimony, settlement recommendations, and trial outcome predictions (~60 days before trial). Use when preparing carrier pre-trial reports, defense trial assessments, or…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: pre-trial-report language: en description: Drafts objective pre-trial reports for insurance carriers in personal injury defense litigation. Covers liability analysis, damages evaluation, venue/jury analysis, cost projections, expert testimony, settlement recommendations, and trial outcome predictions (~60 days before trial). Use when preparing carrier pre-trial reports, defense trial assessments, or settlement recommendation memos. tags:

  • drafting
  • litigation
  • memo

Insurance Defense Pre-Trial Report

Produces a structured, objective pre-trial report to an insurance carrier with honest risk assessment and actionable settlement/trial recommendations.

Required Inputs

  1. Case file — pleadings, discovery, depositions, prior status reports
  2. Trial date — confirmed date, judge, courtroom
  3. Medical records — treatment history, IME results, pre-existing conditions
  4. Expert reports — all retained experts (both sides)
  5. Billing records — fees/costs to date, projected trial costs
  6. Settlement history — demand/offer chronology, mediation results
  7. Surveillance/impeachment materials — if obtained

Header Block

PRE-TRIAL REPORT

TO:      [Claims Manager Name and Title]
         [Insurance Company]
FROM:    [Attorney Name], [Firm Name]
DATE:    [Current Date]
RE:      [Insured] v. [Plaintiff]
         [Court and Case Number]
         Policy No: [Number] | Claim No: [Number]
         Date of Loss: [Date] | Trial Date: [Date]

Report Sections

Draft each section. Be direct — acknowledge weaknesses, quantify risks, avoid over-promising.

#SectionKey Content
1IntroductionPurpose, timeline (~60 days out), developments since last report
2Trial LogisticsTrial date, duration estimate, judge, remaining deadlines
3Factual SummaryChronological, evidence-supported; flag disputed facts
4Venue & Jury AnalysisHistorical verdict data, jury demographics, comparable verdicts
5Judge & Opposing CounselJudge tendencies, ruling patterns; counsel trial record and style
6Costs & FeesIncurred to date; projected trial costs (attorney, experts, exhibits, post-trial)
7Motions PracticeCompleted motions and impact; pending (especially MSJ); planned MILs
8Liability AnalysisElements plaintiff must prove with evidence strength; comparative negligence %; affirmative defenses
9Damages AnalysisUse damages table below
10Expert TestimonyBoth sides — qualifications, expected testimony, credibility, impeachment
11Party PresentationPlaintiff credibility, deposition performance; defendant witness quality
12Surveillance & ImpeachmentFootage inconsistencies, social media, medical contradictions, witness conflicts
13Trial Outcome PredictionsDefense verdict % with reasoning; verdict range (low/mid/high) if plaintiff prevails
14Settlement RecommendationsCurrent posture, recommended range with reasoning, timing
15Final RecommendationsOverall assessment, cost-benefit, clear trial-vs-settle recommendation with timeline

Damages Table

CategoryAmount/RangeEvidence StrengthNotes
Past medical expenses$Gap treatment, causation
Future medical expenses$Expert support, speculative elements
Past lost wages$Documentation quality
Future earning capacity$Vocational expert opinions
Pain & suffering$Comparable awards in venue
Loss of enjoyment$Jury appeal factors
Pre-existing conditions—Apportionment arguments

Verdict Prediction Summary

Defense Verdict Likelihood:   ___%
If Plaintiff Prevails:
  Low:    $___   Mid:    $___   High:   $___
  Comparative Fault Offset:   ___%
Recommended Settlement Range: $___  –  $___

Critical Rules

  • Objectivity first — report may be discoverable in bad faith litigation; every statement must be accurate and defensible
  • Acknowledge weaknesses — carriers need honest risk information for business decisions
  • Don't force settlement — if the case is defensible, say so; if not, say that clearly
  • Consistency with prior reports — explain what changed and why if recommendation shifts
  • Quantify — percentages for liability outcomes, dollar ranges for verdicts, cost projections
  • Flag coverage issues — note anything creating coverage disputes or bad faith exposure
  • Jurisdictional specifics — comparative negligence thresholds, damage caps, forum-state rules

Checklist

  • Case identifiers (policy, claim, case numbers) included
  • Trial logistics and remaining deadlines covered
  • Factual summary is objective and evidence-supported
  • Venue/jury analysis with comparable verdict data
  • Judge and opposing counsel assessed
  • Complete cost analysis (incurred + projected)
  • Liability analysis covers each element and defense
  • Damages analyzed with ranges
  • Expert testimony assessed for both sides
  • Surveillance/impeachment evidence catalogued
  • Outcome predictions realistic with reasoning
  • Settlement recommendations specific with dollar ranges
  • Defense weaknesses acknowledged
  • Recommendations actionable with decision timeline
Skills enregistrées