L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

flag-review-finding

flag-review-finding

Add, list, or resolve a structured code-review improvement flag. Use it when the user says a review finding was wrong, noisy, or missed something and wants that recorded.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: flag-review-finding description: "Add, list, or resolve a structured code-review improvement flag. Use it when the user says a review finding was wrong, noisy, or missed something and wants that recorded." argument-hint: "add CATEGORY BODY [--repository owner/repo --pull N [--review-version V --finding ID]] | list | findings --repository owner/repo --pull N | resolve ID RESOLUTION" allowed-tools: ["Bash({{PYTHON}} -B "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/)", "PowerShell({{PYTHON}} -B "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/)"]

Flag a review finding

Use the configured code-review flag store through the commands below; do not edit the store, a Markdown ledger, or a review report. Each command prints one fact per line. A failure prints FAILED <reason> and changes nothing; show the reason.

Add a flag with a category and rationale. Associate it with a pull request and finding when it concerns one, using the full owner/repo identity and the finding's label in the review report, such as v2 F002: review version 2 and finding F002. When neither the user nor the conversation gives the label, list the pull request's open findings and ask the user which one they mean:

{{PYTHON}} -B "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/flag_review_finding.py" findings --repository "<owner/repo>" --pull "<number>"

It prints FINDING v<version> <finding> <severity> <path>:<line> <headline> per open or unverified finding, under the label its report shows, then COUNT <n>. Then add the flag; it refuses a finding that review does not have:

{{PYTHON}} -B "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/flag_review_finding.py" add "<category>" "<rationale>" --repository "<owner/repo>" --pull "<number>" --review-version "<version>" --finding "<finding id>"

It prints ADDED <flag id>. review-insights links a flag that names a finding to the recommendations covering it, and its synthesis can name any open flag, one that names no finding included; accepting a recommendation resolves the flags it links.

List the open flags:

{{PYTHON}} -B "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/flag_review_finding.py" list

It prints FLAG <flag id> <category> <target> <body> per open flag, with the body cut to 160 characters and - as the target of a flag that names neither a repository nor a pull request, then COUNT <n>.

Resolve an open flag by its ID (such as RF-000004) with a non-empty resolution:

{{PYTHON}} -B "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/flag_review_finding.py" resolve "<flag id>" "<resolution>"

It prints RESOLVED <flag id>, or ALREADY_RESOLVED <flag id> when the flag was resolved earlier; it keeps that earlier resolution.

Skills enregistrées