L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

when-stuck

when-stuck

Dispatch to right technique when you hit a wall

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: when-stuck description: Dispatch to right technique when you hit a wall version: 1.0.0 author: Ariff when_to_use: When progress stops - identify stuck type and apply matching technique

When Stuck

Recognition

You're stuck when:

  • Same approach tried multiple times
  • Context window filling with failed attempts
  • No clear next step
  • Feeling "lost" or "frustrated"

The Dispatch Table

Stuck TypeSymptomsTechnique
Don't understandRequirements unclear→ Ask user for clarification
Can't find codeNo idea where logic lives→ Semantic search, file patterns
Bug won't dieFix doesn't work→ Root cause tracing
Tests keep failingCan't get green→ Defense in depth, fresh look
Scope creepTask keeps growing→ Scope boundary check
Missing contextNeed info I don't have→ Read more files, ask user
Wrong approachThis path won't work→ Brainstorm alternatives
OverwhelmedToo complex→ Break into smaller pieces
Going in circlesSame ground repeatedly→ Fresh agent via subagent

Technique Details

Don't Understand → Clarify

STOP trying to guess
ASK: "I'm unclear on [specific thing]. Could you clarify [specific question]?"
WAIT for response before proceeding

Can't Find Code → Search Strategies

1. Semantic search with concept terms
2. Grep for unique strings
3. File pattern matching
4. Read likely files
5. List directories to discover structure

Bug Won't Die → Root Cause Trace

1. Document exact symptom
2. Trace backward: where does bad value come from?
3. Keep tracing until you find ORIGIN
4. Fix at origin, not symptoms

Tests Keep Failing → Fresh Eyes

1. Stop. Step back.
2. Re-read test expectation
3. Re-read actual behavior
4. Check: is test right or is code right?
5. Check: is environment consistent?

Scope Creep → Boundary Check

1. Re-read original request
2. List what you've done vs. what was asked
3. Identify scope drift
4. Either: refocus OR ask user if expansion wanted

Missing Context → Gather More

1. What specific info do you need?
2. Where might it be? (files, user knowledge, docs)
3. Ask/search for that specific info
4. Don't proceed without it

Wrong Approach → Brainstorm

1. What other approaches exist?
2. List 3-4 alternatives
3. Evaluate each briefly
4. Pick most promising, try it
5. If that fails, try next

Overwhelmed → Decompose

1. What's the smallest possible piece?
2. Do JUST that piece
3. Verify it works
4. What's next smallest piece?
5. Repeat until done

Going in Circles → Fresh Agent

Signal: Same ground covered 3+ times
Action: Use subagent for specific subtask
Pass: Clear scope, success criteria
Return: Just the result, not the journey

Anti-Patterns

❌ Brute Force

Trying same thing harder won't work
If it failed twice, it needs a different approach

❌ Hoping

"Maybe this time..." → No
Stop. Diagnose. Change approach.

❌ Hiding

Not admitting you're stuck wastes time
Say: "I'm stuck on X. Here's what I've tried..."

Success Metric

After applying technique:

  • Clear next step identified
  • Progress resuming
  • If still stuck → try next technique from table
  • If nothing works → ASK USER for help

Integration

Pairs well with:

  • assumption-checker → Often stuck because of wrong assumption
  • intent-clarifier → Often stuck because of unclear intent
  • brainstorming → For generating alternatives
  • root-cause-tracing → For debugging stuck
Skills enregistrées