L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Documents · SKILL.md

whistleblower-protection-policy

whistleblower-protection-policy

Drafts a U.S. whistleblower-protection policy for corporate and nonprofit organizations. Triggers when the user needs a whistleblower policy, retaliation-prohibition clause, hotline-reporting framework, compliance-ethics policy, or governance document addressing SOX, Dodd-Frank, OSHA, or state whistleblower statutes.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: whistleblower-protection-policy language: en description: >- Drafts a U.S. whistleblower-protection policy for corporate and nonprofit organizations. Triggers when the user needs a whistleblower policy, retaliation-prohibition clause, hotline-reporting framework, compliance-ethics policy, or governance document addressing SOX, Dodd-Frank, OSHA, or state whistleblower statutes. tags:

  • corporate
  • drafting
  • memo

Whistleblower Protection Policy

Produces a board-adoptable whistleblower policy with fill-in placeholders and U.S. compliance guardrails for public, private, and nonprofit entities.

Quick Start

Gather before drafting:

  1. Org profile — legal name, entity type (public/private/nonprofit), governing state, reporting contacts.
  2. Statute applicability — SOX, Dodd-Frank, OSHA, False Claims Act, state statutes.
  3. Governance stack — existing code of conduct, handbook, grievance/investigation policies.
  4. Administration model — who receives reports, investigates, and oversees outcomes.
  5. Channel preferences — email, portal, hotline, written/verbal; tone and length targets.
  6. Adoption mechanics — signatory roles, effective-date process, review cadence.

If any input is missing, emit a short clarifying checklist before drafting.

Policy Sections (fixed order)

#SectionRequired Content
0Title block & versionOrg name, version, effective date, scope entities
1Introduction & commitmentScope statement, non-retaliation promise, protected intent
2Covered concernsSerious-misconduct taxonomy, explicit non-coverage examples
3Reporting proceduresNormal path, override path, anonymous option, channel placeholders
4Investigation & resolutionTriage, assignment, timeline expectations, reporter updates
5Anti-retaliationStrict prohibition, protected-conduct examples, sanctions
6Confidentiality & limitsNeed-to-know bounds, legal exceptions, expectation management
7Good-faith reportingReasonable-belief standard (no certainty burden), bad-faith consequences
8Administration & governanceBoard/committee roles, secure records, training, periodic review
9External legal rightsSupplement-not-replace, no internal-prerequisite condition
10Adoption & effective dateBoard resolution, signature block, supersession language

Required Placeholders

Use exactly these tokens:

  • [Organization Name], [State of Formation], [Board Chair], [Executive Director/CEO]
  • [Primary Contact], [Alternative Contact], [Hotline URL/Number]
  • [Adoption Date], [Effective Date], [Review Cycle]

Citation Discipline

  • Reference statutes only when clearly supported by entity type and jurisdiction.
  • Tag uncertain scope with [VERIFY] and request jurisdictional confirmation.
  • Always verify: SOX §806 applicability, Dodd-Frank retaliation channels, OSHA/state overlap.

Output Format

  • Numbered sections with clear headings.
  • Prose-first; bullets only where needed (max 5 per section).
  • End each section with implementation-ready fill-ins, not drafting notes.
  • Close with signature block for Board Chair and CEO/Executive Director.

Pitfalls & Checks

  • Never state that internal reporting is a legal prerequisite for external agency filing.
  • Branch public-company vs. nonprofit/private language where statute relevance differs.
  • Distinguish anti-frivolous-reporting language from negligent or honest mistakes.
  • Protect good-faith reporters regardless of substantiation outcome.
  • Set explicit confidentiality limits: need-to-know, lawful disclosure, legal process, audit/defense.
  • Require annual or semiannual review, training completion, and board reporting metrics.
  • End with disclaimer: "This policy is internal guidance and does not replace legal counsel for specific rights."
Skills enregistrées