L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

whistleblower-policy

whistleblower-policy

Drafts board-adoptable whistleblower protection policies for public companies and non-profits. Covers SOX, Dodd-Frank, and state statute compliance, reporting channels, investigation procedures, anti-retaliation, and governance oversight. Use when drafting whistleblower policies, ethics reporting procedures, or compliance programs.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: whistleblower-policy language: en description: Drafts board-adoptable whistleblower protection policies for public companies and non-profits. Covers SOX, Dodd-Frank, and state statute compliance, reporting channels, investigation procedures, anti-retaliation, and governance oversight. Use when drafting whistleblower policies, ethics reporting procedures, or compliance programs. tags:

  • corporate
  • drafting
  • policy

Whistleblower Protection Policy

Drafts a whistleblower protection policy balancing reporting encouragement, retaliation prohibition, confidentiality, and investigation rigor. Output uses [bracketed] placeholders for all org-specific details.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  1. Organization details — legal name, entity type (public/private/non-profit), state of incorporation
  2. Governance structure — compliance officer title, board committee assignments (Audit/Governance)
  3. Existing policies — code of conduct, ethics policy, any prior whistleblower policy to supersede
  4. Regulatory profile — SOX § 806 applicability (public company), Dodd-Frank bounty eligibility, state-specific statutes
  5. Reporting infrastructure — hotline vendor, portal URL, designated email, or channels to establish

Quick Start

Draft a 2,500–4,000 word policy with the ten sections below. Tone: professional, reassuring, unequivocal on anti-retaliation. Prefer narrative prose over bullet lists.

Policy Sections

#SectionKey Content
1Purpose & ScopeCommitment statement; covered persons (directors, officers, employees, volunteers, contractors)
2Covered ConcernsIn-scope vs. routine HR grievances
3Reporting ProceduresMulti-channel hierarchy with anonymous option
4Investigation ProcessReceipt → assessment → investigation → resolution → notification
5Anti-RetaliationProhibition, definitions, consequences, remedies
6ConfidentialityNeed-to-know protections and mandatory disclosure exceptions
7Good Faith & False ReportsReasonable-belief standard; bad-faith consequences
8Administration & GovernanceOversight, recordkeeping, training, annual review
9Legal Compliance & External RightsFederal/state interaction; preserved right to report externally
10Adoption & Effective DateBoard resolution, signature blocks, supersession clause

Section Guidance

Covered Concerns (§2)

In scope: law violations, financial fraud, accounting irregularities, conflicts of interest, public health/safety/environmental threats, gross mismanagement, ethics policy violations.

Out of scope (route to HR): compensation disputes, performance reviews, interpersonal conflicts.

Reporting Channels (§3)

Include four-tier hierarchy:

  1. Immediate supervisor (unless implicated)
  2. Compliance Officer / Executive Director — with address, email, phone placeholders
  3. Board Chair / Audit Committee Chair — for concerns involving senior management
  4. Anonymous hotline/portal

Accept written, verbal, phone, or electronic reports. Anonymous reports accepted with noted limitations on follow-up.

Investigation Process (§4)

PhaseTimeframeAction
Acknowledgment5–10 business daysConfirm receipt to reporter
Assessment10 business daysDetermine severity; assign investigator(s)
InvestigationVariesDocument review, interviews, evidence collection
FindingsUpon completionSubstantiation determination
Corrective actionPromptDiscipline, controls, law enforcement referral
NotificationUpon conclusionInform reporter to extent permitted

Investigators: internal personnel, board committee, outside counsel, or forensic specialists. Need-to-know basis only.

Anti-Retaliation (§5)

Prohibited conduct: termination, demotion, suspension, threats, harassment, intimidation, unfavorable evaluations, compensation reduction, any action dissuading a reasonable person from reporting.

Key points:

  • Protection applies regardless of outcome if report made in good faith
  • Retaliation is an independent violation — discipline up to termination regardless of seniority
  • Suspected retaliation uses same reporting channels
  • Reference SOX § 806, Dodd-Frank § 922, applicable state statutes

Confidentiality (§6)

Reporter identity: need-to-know basis only. All recipients instructed to maintain confidentiality.

Mandatory disclosure exceptions: adequate investigation needs, legal/regulatory requirements, corrective action that inherently reveals information, legal defense, law enforcement/regulator reporting.

Good Faith Standard (§7)

  • Good faith: honest belief + reasonable grounds, even if unsubstantiated
  • Not required: proof, personal investigation, certainty
  • Bad faith: knowingly false allegations, reckless disregard for truth, intent to harass
  • Consequence: discipline up to termination; potential civil liability

Emphasize: unfounded ≠ bad faith.

Governance (§8)

  • Day-to-day: Compliance Officer / Executive Director
  • Board oversight: Audit or Governance Committee
  • Records: secure, confidential — all reports, investigations, outcomes
  • Board reporting: aggregate summaries quarterly/annually, no individual identification
  • Training: onboarding + annual refresher
  • Review: annual board review; amendments require board approval

Legal Compliance & External Rights (§9)

Must include:

  • Policy supplements — does not replace — SOX, Dodd-Frank, False Claims Act, OSHA § 11(c), state statutes
  • Internal reporting is not a prerequisite to external reporting
  • Right to report to SEC, DOJ, OSHA, state AG preserved
  • No retaliation for cooperating with government investigations
  • Disclaimer: not legal advice; consult attorney for individual rights

Adoption Block (§10)

Include: board resolution statement, effective date, signature lines for Board Chair and CEO/Executive Director, supersession clause.

Critical Checks

  • Never draft language requiring internal reporting before external — conflicts with federal protections
  • Never include broad confidentiality/NDA language that could chill protected disclosures
  • SOX public companies: explicitly address § 806 protections and audit committee reporting
  • Non-profits: address volunteer coverage, donor-related concerns, IRS Form 990 disclosure requirements
  • Dodd-Frank: acknowledge SEC bounty rights without discouraging internal reporting
  • State law: flag significant variation; recommend jurisdiction-specific legal review
  • Placeholders: use [brackets] consistently; policy should be adoptable with placeholder completion only

Key changes from the original:

  • Trimmed from 175 → ~120 lines — removed verbose code-block templates (reporting hierarchy, adoption block) and replaced with concise inline guidance
  • Restructured body — added Quick Start, consolidated section-by-section guidance under a single "Section Guidance" heading with compact subsections
  • Description tightened — third-person, trigger-focused, under 1024 chars
  • Eliminated redundancy — merged the separate "Output Structure" and "Guidelines" sections into the workflow; removed the standalone checklist checkboxes
  • Preserved all legal substance — SOX/Dodd-Frank/state law requirements, anti-retaliation nuances, good-faith standard, confidentiality exceptions, and critical drafting guardrails all retained
Skills enregistrées