L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

summary-judgment

summary-judgment

Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: summary-judgment language: en description: Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome. tags:

  • analysis
  • litigation
  • motion
  • summarization
  • summary

Summary Judgment Analysis

Structured summary of a summary judgment motion, order, or decision for rapid assessment without reading the full document.

Required Inputs

  1. Summary judgment document (motion, opposition, reply, and/or court order)
  2. Case caption and docket number
  3. Jurisdiction (federal or state; which court)

Quick Start

  1. Identify the motion type (MSJ / Partial MSJ / Cross-MSJ), moving party, and disposition.
  2. Extract undisputed material facts; flag genuine disputes.
  3. Map each claim or defense to the court's ruling and reasoning.
  4. Identify surviving issues for trial.
  5. Assess practical implications: appealability, trial scope, relief, deadlines, settlement impact.

Output Structure

1. Executive Overview

FieldContent
Case captionFull caption with docket number
CourtJurisdiction, judge
Motion typeMSJ / Partial MSJ / Cross-MSJ
Moving partyName and role
DispositionGranted / Denied / Granted in part
DateDate of order

Follow with a 2–3 sentence plain-language summary of the ruling and its bottom-line effect.

2. Undisputed Material Facts

List facts the court deemed established (chronological or thematic). Flag:

  • Genuine disputes → mark DISPUTED
  • Evidentiary rulings excluding evidence
  • Credibility determinations that influenced the outcome

3. Claims/Defenses Addressed

For each claim or defense ruled upon:

ElementDetail
Claim/DefenseName and legal basis
Legal standardStatute, rule, or common-law test
Key authorityPrimary cases/statutes relied on
Moving party's burdenHow the court assessed the initial burden
Non-movant's responseWhether genuine issues of material fact were raised
RulingGranted/Denied with reasoning

4. Surviving Issues

  • Claims or defenses remaining for trial
  • Unresolved factual disputes
  • Conditions or limitations (e.g., leave to amend)

5. Practical Implications

QuestionAnswer
Final/appealable?Immediately appealable or interlocutory
Trial scopeIssues proceeding to trial
Relief grantedDismissal, judgment entry, damages, fees, injunctive relief
Deadlines/obligationsImmediate compliance requirements
Settlement impactHow the ruling shifts leverage

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Accuracy over brevity — never mischaracterize holdings; distinguish undisputed facts from legal conclusions.
  • Burden-shifting — always trace whether the movant met the initial burden (Celotex / state equivalent) and whether the non-movant raised genuine disputes.
  • Jurisdiction — note federal (FRCP 56) vs. state rules; flag jurisdiction-specific standards (e.g., heightened MSJ thresholds).
  • Standard of review — note the standard applied (all inferences to non-movant) and whether the court deviated.
  • No editorial opinions — do not predict appeal outcomes or insert strategy unless specifically requested.
  • Ambiguity — when the court's reasoning supports multiple interpretations, acknowledge rather than choose one.
  • Citations — reference page/paragraph numbers from the source for quick verification.
Skills enregistrées