executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
reg-bi-policyDrafts board-ready Suitability and Best Interest policies for broker-dealers under FINRA Rule 2111 and SEC Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI). Covers the four Reg BI component obligations, suitability framework, Form CRS integration, supervision, and recordkeeping. Use when drafting Reg BI compliance policies, suitability procedures, or best interest obligat…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Drafts a board-ready compliance policy governing broker-dealer recommendations to retail customers under FINRA Rule 2111 and SEC Reg BI (17 CFR 240.15l-1).
Gather before drafting:
Draft a formal policy with hierarchical section numbering (1.1, 1.2, etc.) suitable for board approval. Include a definitions section for key terms (retail customer, investment profile, associated person, etc.). Use the section order below.
| Component | Scope | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Reasonable-Basis | Product/strategy | Due diligence on risks, rewards, costs, complexity, liquidity, volatility; written approval; enhanced review for complex/novel products |
| Customer-Specific | Individual customer | Match to investment profile: age, finances, tax status, objectives, experience, time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance |
| Quantitative | Transaction patterns | Turnover ratios, cost-to-equity ratios, trading frequency; customer-initiated vs. recommended; review thresholds |
For customer-specific suitability, also address:
Written disclosure before or at time of recommendation, in plain English:
| Category | Content |
|---|---|
| Relationship | Capacity (BD vs. advisor), service scope, limitations |
| Costs | Material fees, transaction costs, account-level costs |
| Conflicts | Compensation-driven conflicts, proprietary products, third-party payments |
Include procedures for keeping disclosures current.
Three-part test for each recommendation:
Require a reasonably available alternatives analysis — evaluate less costly, less complex, or lower-risk alternatives meeting the same objectives. Document the analytical framework.
Systematic conflict identification:
For each conflict: disclose + mitigate, or eliminate. Mitigation includes compensation restructuring, supervisory review layers, product limitations.
[VERIFY] and 17 CFR 279.2 [VERIFY]: relationships/services, fees/costs/conflicts, standard of conduct, disciplinary history, how to get more infoPer-recommendation checklist:
Retention: 6 years minimum per SEC Rule 17a-4; first 2 years in easily accessible location. Index for examination retrieval.
[VERIFY] — always verify against current rule textKey changes made:
tags frontmatter fielddescription while preserving trigger keywords