L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

opinion-summary

opinion-summary

Summarizes U.S. transactional legal opinions into executive-ready briefs preserving issues, analysis, conclusions, qualifications, and key authorities. Triggers when asked to summarize a legal opinion, opinion memorandum, legal analysis memo, or produce an executive opinion recap.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: opinion-summary language: en description: Summarizes U.S. transactional legal opinions into executive-ready briefs preserving issues, analysis, conclusions, qualifications, and key authorities. Triggers when asked to summarize a legal opinion, opinion memorandum, legal analysis memo, or produce an executive opinion recap. tags:

  • summarization
  • summary
  • transactional

Legal Opinion Summary

Condense a full legal opinion into a professional summary that preserves substance and qualifications. Target 20–30% of original length unless instructed otherwise.

Quick Start

Before summarizing, confirm:

  • Full opinion text (including relied-upon exhibits/appendices)
  • Governing jurisdiction(s) and transaction context
  • Privilege/confidentiality marking requirements
  • Target audience and desired length

Required Sections

SectionContent
Issues PresentedPlain-language statement of each legal question; number if multiple
Factual BackgroundMaterial facts only; omit narrative detail
Legal AnalysisPer issue: controlling standard, key reasoning, decisive facts
Conclusion / RecommendationOutcome, recommendation, reliance conditions
Qualifications / AssumptionsMaterial limits, open questions, reliance assumptions
Risk / AlternativesIf addressed: risks, likelihoods, alternatives
AuthoritiesControlling statutes, regs, or cases; short cites only

Issue Analysis Table

For each issue, populate:

IssueStandardKey FactsReasoningConclusion

Compression Rules

  • Include every legal question and final conclusion.
  • Preserve all material qualifiers, uncertainties, and counterarguments.
  • Retain controlling statutory language or contract excerpts when central to analysis.
  • Remove string citations and non-controlling authorities.
  • Use short citations sufficient for lookup.

Pitfalls

  • Never introduce theories or arguments absent from the original opinion.
  • Never overstate certainty — mirror all caveats, limits, and contingencies exactly.
  • Preserve privilege/work-product sensitivity; apply required markings.
  • Mark uncertain citations with [VERIFY].
  • Maintain professional memorandum tone throughout.

Key changes: consolidated the description into a tighter trigger-focused sentence, removed the verbose template (the Required Sections table + Issue Analysis Table serve the same purpose more concisely), merged the guidelines into a "Pitfalls" section, eliminated the redundant "Compression Checklist" heading in favor of "Compression Rules", and cut ~30% of tokens while preserving all legal substance. Please grant write permission so I can save the file, or copy the content above directly.

Skills enregistrées