---

name: military-law-summary language: en description: Generates structured summaries of military law matters including courts-martial, UCMJ disciplinary actions, administrative separations, and appellate decisions. Trigger when a user needs a reference summary of a military justice proceeding, CAAF/CCA opinion, Article 15 action, or service regulation issue for JAG officers, command staff, or military legal practitioners. tags:

• analysis
• litigation
• summarization
• summary

---

Military Law Summary

Produces a standalone structured summary of a military law matter — court-martial, disciplinary action, regulatory issue, or appellate decision — for JAG officers, command staff, and practitioners.

Quick Start

1. Collect source materials: court-martial decisions, appellate opinions (CAAF, service CCAs), UCMJ provisions, MCM guidance, administrative records, or service regulations.
2. Identify matter details: service branch, rank/status, proceeding type (Article 15, summary/special/general court-martial, admin separation, appellate review).
3. Produce the summary using the output structure below.

Output Structure

1. Header Block

Field	Content
Matter	Case name or regulatory matter identifier
Service Branch	Army / Navy / Air Force / Marines / Coast Guard / Space Force
Personnel	Rank, status, role
Proceeding Type	Article 15 / Summary CM / Special CM / General CM / Admin separation / Appellate review / Regulatory
UCMJ Articles	Charged articles (e.g., Art. 120, Art. 134)
Disposition Date	Date of decision or action
Reviewing Authority	CAAF / Service CCA / Convening authority / Other

2. Factual Background

• Core facts in chronological order
• Relevant military context (unit, deployment status, command relationship)
• Nature of alleged offenses or regulatory issues

3. Procedural History

• Charges preferred and referred; forum and plea
• Findings by article and specification
• Sentence imposed
• Post-trial convening authority action
• Appellate history (CCA, CAAF, Supreme Court if applicable)

4. Legal Analysis

Per significant issue:

• Issue: Framed as a question
• Standard of review: De novo, abuse of discretion, factual sufficiency, etc.
• Controlling authority: UCMJ article, MCM provision, binding precedent
• Reasoning: How authority was applied to facts
• Holding: Outcome
• Dissents/concurrences: Key reasoning if any

Note divergence from civilian criminal law where relevant.

5. Elements and Evidence (Offense Cases)

Element	Evidence Presented	Sufficiency
{Element}	{Key evidence}	Met / Not met

6. Administrative Matters (If Applicable)

• Applicable standard (characterization of service, fitness-for-duty, clearance adjudication)
• Deference afforded to military decision-makers
• Collateral consequences: benefits, veteran status, employment impact

7. Practical Implications

• Effect on future practice and command guidance
• Changes to established precedent
• Unresolved questions or anticipated developments
• Actionable takeaways for advisors and commanders

Pitfalls and Checks

• Citations: Use standard military format — UCMJ articles (Art. 32, UCMJ), MCM rules (R.C.M. 1001), CAAF opinions (United States v. Smith, 80 M.J. 200 (C.A.A.F. 2020)). Mark unverified citations with [VERIFY].
• Do not conflate with civilian procedure: Military justice is a distinct framework. Flag where military due process diverges (command influence, military judge authority, unlawful command influence).
• Phase awareness: Identify pre-trial, trial, post-trial/clemency, or appellate posture and tailor analysis accordingly.
• Constitutional rights in military context: Address Art. 31(b) vs. Miranda, search authorization vs. warrant (4th Amend.), First Amendment limits for service members.
• Neutral posture: Do not advocate; summarize analytically.
• Standalone completeness: Summary must be usable without the underlying source documents.