---

name: med-mal-summary language: en description: Produces structured medical malpractice case summaries from medical records for personal injury litigation. Extracts chronological care narratives, identifies potential standard-of-care breaches, traces causation, assesses damages, and flags expert needs and statute of limitations issues. Use when evaluating medical negligence claims, onboarding med-mal matters, or assessing case merits during pre-filing or discovery. tags:

• analysis
• litigation
• summary

---

Medical Malpractice Summary

Produces a structured med-mal case summary from medical records for attorney case evaluation and litigation planning.

Prerequisites

1. Medical records — hospital charts, physician notes, nursing notes, discharge summaries
2. Diagnostic materials — lab results, imaging/radiology reports, pathology reports
3. Procedure documentation — operative reports, anesthesia records, consent forms
4. Pharmacy records — medication administration records, prescription history
5. Patient intake — chief complaint, date of incident, treating providers, patient demographics

Output Structure

1. Case Overview Table

Field	Content
Patient	Name, DOB, relevant medical history
Date(s) of alleged negligence	Specific dates
Facility/Provider(s)	Names, specialties, roles
Chief complaint / Presenting condition	Initial presentation
Alleged injury/outcome	Summary of harm
SOL flag	Statute date + discovery rule considerations

2. Chronological Care Narrative

For each treatment episode:

Date	Provider (Specialty)	Clinical Findings	Diagnosis	Treatment/Orders	Outcome/Notes
...	...	...	...	...	...

Flag entries with ⚠ where potential standard-of-care issues exist.

3. Standard of Care Analysis

For each identified deviation:

• Provider: Name and specialty
• Action/Omission: What was done or not done
• Expected standard: What a reasonably competent provider in that specialty would have done
• Supporting basis: Clinical guidelines, protocols, or accepted practice (cite where identifiable)
• Severity: Critical / Significant / Minor

Breach categories to evaluate:

• Diagnostic errors — missed, delayed, or wrong diagnosis
• Failure to order appropriate tests
• Misinterpretation of test results
• Treatment selection errors
• Surgical/procedural errors
• Medication errors (wrong drug, dose, interaction)
• Failure to obtain informed consent
• Monitoring failures (post-op, medication, vitals)
• Premature discharge
• Failure to refer to specialist
• Communication failures between providers
• Documentation gaps or alterations

4. Causation Analysis

For each breach, trace: Breach → Mechanism of Harm → Injury/Outcome

Classify each harm:

Category	Description
Attributable to negligence	Would not have occurred but for the breach
Underlying condition	Natural disease progression
Unavoidable complication	Known risk of necessary treatment
Concurrent/intervening cause	Other contributing factors

5. Damages Assessment

Category	Details	Documentation Source
Additional medical treatment	Surgeries, hospitalizations, rehab, future care	Page/record refs
Physical impairment	Permanent injury, disability, functional limitations	Page/record refs
Pain and suffering	Duration, severity, ongoing nature	Page/record refs
Lost wages / Earning capacity	Work restrictions, vocational impact	Page/record refs
Life expectancy impact	If applicable	Page/record refs

6. Legal & Evidentiary Flags

• Expert specialties needed — list by specialty based on providers and issues involved
• Statute of limitations — calculate from treatment dates; note discovery rule triggers
• Record red flags — gaps, late entries, alterations, inconsistencies between providers
• Provider admissions — documented apologies, acknowledgments of error, incident reports
• Applicable guidelines — cite specific clinical practice guidelines or hospital protocols implicated
• Strengths — strongest facts supporting liability and damages
• Weaknesses — defenses, contributory factors, documentation gaps undermining the claim

Guidelines

• Cite every factual assertion to specific page numbers, dates, and document sources
• Use medical terminology with parenthetical plain-language explanations on first use
• Present balanced analysis — identify both strengths and weaknesses of the claim
• Do not render legal conclusions on ultimate liability; frame as "potential" breaches for attorney evaluation
• Flag any records that appear incomplete or were not provided
• If standard-of-care analysis requires subspecialty knowledge beyond the records, note that expert consultation is needed
• Mark any cited clinical guidelines or statistics with [VERIFY] unless directly quoted from provided records