L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

litigation-support-summary

litigation-support-summary

Generates structured management summaries of active commercial litigation matters. Covers case overview, procedural posture, strategy, deadlines, discovery status, budget, and risk analysis. Use when preparing case status reports, onboarding stakeholders to active litigation, or conducting periodic case reviews.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: litigation-support-summary language: en description: Generates structured management summaries of active commercial litigation matters. Covers case overview, procedural posture, strategy, deadlines, discovery status, budget, and risk analysis. Use when preparing case status reports, onboarding stakeholders to active litigation, or conducting periodic case reviews.

Litigation Support Summary

Synthesizes case materials into a structured management document (5-10 pages) for legal teams and clients to track progress on active litigation.

Quick Start

  1. Gather inputs: pleadings, docket sheet, court orders, discovery materials, scheduling orders
  2. Follow the six-section output structure below
  3. Apply the quality checks before delivering

Required Inputs

  • Case file: pleadings, court orders, docket sheet, case caption/number, presiding judge
  • Discovery materials: requests, responses, production logs, deposition transcripts
  • Scheduling orders: court-imposed deadlines, trial date, expert disclosure dates
  • Correspondence (if available): strategic memos, client communications
  • Budget/staffing (if available): litigation budget, team assignments

Output Structure

1. Case Overview & Procedural Posture

FieldContent
Caption & DocketFull case caption, docket number
Court & JudgeCourt, jurisdiction, presiding judge
PartiesAll parties with roles
Claims & DefensesEach cause of action/counterclaim with status
Procedural StagePleadings / discovery / pre-trial / trial
Significant RulingsKey motions, hearings, orders

2. Strategy & Theory of Case

  • Primary legal theories and key factual arguments
  • Desired outcome (damages, injunctive relief, dismissal, etc.)
  • Strategy evolution based on discovery/rulings/new facts
  • Candid strengths/weaknesses for both sides:
FactorOur PositionOpposing Position
Strongest argument
Key vulnerability
Critical unresolved issue
  • ADR/settlement posture: demand/offer history, mediation prospects

3. Timeline & Critical Deadlines

Chronological table covering discovery cutoffs, expert disclosures, dispositive motion deadlines, pretrial conferences, trial date, and internal targets.

DateEvent/DeadlineStatusAction Required
pastEventComplete--
upcomingDeadlinePendingOwner + prep needed

Flag deadlines requiring immediate attention.

4. Discovery Status & Key Evidence

Written discovery (interrogatories, doc requests, RFAs): track served, received, outstanding, disputes.

Depositions: witness, date, status (completed/scheduled/needed), key testimony.

Critical evidence: most significant documents/testimony and relevance to case theory.

Open issues: privilege disputes, protective orders, Daubert challenges, outstanding productions.

5. Resource Allocation & Budget

Track by category (attorney fees, experts, e-discovery, court reporters, travel): budget, spent, projected remaining. Include team assignments and resource constraints.

Omit if no budget data available; note the gap and recommend gathering it.

6. Risks, Opportunities & Recommendations

  • Risks: adverse outcome exposure (liability + damages range), cost escalation triggers, reputational concerns
  • Opportunities: favorable developments, settlement leverage, dispositive motion prospects
  • Recommendations: numbered, actionable next steps with priority (High/Medium/Low) and owner

Quality Checks

  • Cite specific documents by name and page/paragraph when asserting facts
  • Distinguish established facts, disputed facts, and legal contentions
  • Provide candid assessments, not advocacy; flag information gaps
  • Use accessible language while maintaining legal precision; define terms of art on first use
  • Note the summary date; frame as a living document
  • Mark as attorney-client privileged / work product as appropriate
Skills enregistrées