L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

case-briefs

case-briefs

Generates structured case briefs from judicial opinions. Use when the user provides a court opinion and needs a case brief, case summary, or distillation of a judicial decision for legal research.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: case-briefs language: en description: Generates structured case briefs from judicial opinions. Use when the user provides a court opinion and needs a case brief, case summary, or distillation of a judicial decision for legal research.

Case Brief Generation

Produces a structured case brief from a judicial opinion or case reporter entry. Extracts caption, procedural posture, facts, issues, holdings, reasoning, and significance into a standardized format.

Quick Start

Given a court opinion, produce a brief with these six sections in order:

  1. Caption & Procedural Posture — full case name, court, date, citation; how the case reached this court; lower court decision and basis for review
  2. Statement of Facts — material facts chronologically; distinguish background, operative, and procedural facts; include only facts the court deemed relevant
  3. Issues Presented — frame as precise yes/no or standard-identification questions; one issue per entry
  4. Holding & Disposition — court's answer to each issue; narrow holding vs. broader principles; affirmed / reversed / remanded / other
  5. Reasoning & Analysis — doctrines, statutes, precedents relied upon; analytical framework or test applied; concurrences and dissents with key departures
  6. Significance — new precedent, clarification, or notable application; impact on future cases and practice

Core Guidelines

  • Use the opinion's exact language for legal standards, tests, and doctrines
  • Mark direct quotations clearly
  • Target 1–3 pages depending on complexity
  • For multi-issue opinions, separate each issue with its own holding and reasoning
  • Maintain objective, analytical tone throughout

Pitfalls

  • Speculation on gaps: if the source is incomplete on any element, note the limitation — never fill in missing details
  • Overbroad holdings: state the narrow holding first, then any broader principle the court announced
  • Conflating facts and analysis: keep the facts section purely factual; save legal characterization for reasoning
Skills enregistrées