executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md
claims-substantiation
claims-substantiationUse when validating marketing claims on product packaging or advertising, checking if a claim is permitted in a market, determining evidence requirements for a specific claim type, avoiding greenwashing violations, or answering "can I legally say [claim] on my product?"
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Documentation de la Skill
GitHubname: claims-substantiation description: Use when validating marketing claims on product packaging or advertising, checking if a claim is permitted in a market, determining evidence requirements for a specific claim type, avoiding greenwashing violations, or answering "can I legally say [claim] on my product?"
Claims Substantiation
Validate marketing claims against regulations. Every claim on your product or marketing must be substantiated before use. Unsubstantiated claims = enforcement action, fines, recall.
MCP Tools
# Search for claims-related regulation signals
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="claims regulation", limit=25)
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="green claims", limit=25)
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="greenwashing", limit=25)
# Get regulation details for claims rules
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__get_regulation(id="<regulation-id>")
# Check if product ingredients support the claim
mcp__claude_ai_CLEO_LEGAL_API__compliance/check
product_description: "<product with claim>"
ingredients: ["<ingredients>"]
target_markets: ["EU", "US", "UK"]
# Upload claims substantiation file as evidence
mcp__bastion__upload-compliance-document(name="claims-dossier-2026.pdf", document="data:application/pdf;base64,...")
mcp__bastion__add-compliance-test-evidence(testId="<test-id>", name="Claims substantiation dossier", description="Clinical study and consumer perception test for anti-aging claims", evidenceDocumentId="<doc-id>")
Claims Decision Tree
digraph {
rankdir=TB; node [shape=box style=rounded fontsize=10];
claim [label="Proposed claim" shape=hexagon];
type [label="Claim type?" shape=diamond];
cosmetic [label="Cosmetic claim\n(appearance, comfort,\nmoisturize, smooth)"];
health [label="Health/therapeutic claim\n(treats, cures, prevents,\nheals, reduces symptoms)"];
green [label="Environmental claim\n(natural, organic, eco,\nbiodegradable, recyclable)"];
food_claim [label="Nutrition/health claim\n(high in, source of,\nreduces cholesterol)"];
cosm_ok [label="Allowed if:\n6 EU criteria met\n+ evidence exists"];
drug [label="STOP -- this makes\nyour product a DRUG\nin US (FDA 21 USC 321)\nor MEDICINE in EU"];
green_check [label="EU Green Claims\nDirective evidence\nrequired"];
food_check [label="Must be on authorized\nclaims list (EU 432/2012)\nor FDA-compliant"];
claim -> type;
type -> cosmetic [label="cosmetic"];
type -> health [label="health"];
type -> green [label="environmental"];
type -> food_claim [label="food"];
cosmetic -> cosm_ok;
health -> drug;
green -> green_check;
food_claim -> food_check;
}
EU Cosmetics Claims: The 6 Criteria (Regulation 655/2013)
Every cosmetic claim sold in the EU must satisfy ALL 6:
| # | Criterion | What It Means | Fail Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legal compliance | Claim does not contradict EU law | "Approved by the EU" (no EU approval exists for cosmetics) |
| 2 | Truthfulness | Claim reflects actual product performance | "Removes 100% of wrinkles" (physically impossible) |
| 3 | Evidential support | Substantiated by adequate studies/tests | "Clinically proven" without any clinical study |
| 4 | Honesty | Does not attribute unique properties common to all products | "Tested on humans" (all cosmetics sold in EU are tested on humans) |
| 5 | Fairness | Does not denigrate competitors or legal ingredients | "Unlike products with parabens" (implies parabens are unsafe) |
| 6 | Informed decision-making | Average consumer can understand the claim | Complex percentages without context: "148% more luminosity" |
Prohibited Claims (EU)
| Claim | Why Prohibited | What to Say Instead |
|---|---|---|
| "Hypoallergenic" (without evidence) | Must be substantiated by dermatological testing | "Dermatologically tested" (if tested) |
| "100% natural" (with synthetic preservatives) | Misleading -- product contains synthetic substances | State actual natural ingredient percentage: "95% naturally derived ingredients" |
| "Approved by [authority]" | No EU authority approves cosmetics | Remove entirely |
| "Prevents cancer" | Medical claim = reclassifies product as drug | Do not make health claims on cosmetics |
| "Heals eczema" | Medical claim | "Soothes dry, irritated skin" (cosmetic benefit) |
| "Contains no chemicals" | Everything is a chemical; misleading | "Free from [specific substance]" |
| "Dermatologically tested" (without test) | Must have actual dermatological test report | Only claim if test was performed |
| "Anti-aging" (EU guidance) | Acceptable only with evidence of measurable effect | Substantiate with clinical or instrumental measurement |
US: Drug vs Cosmetic Line (FDA)
The single most dangerous claims mistake for US market. If your claim crosses the line, your cosmetic becomes an unapproved drug.
| Cosmetic Claim (OK) | Drug Claim (NOT OK -- triggers FDA drug regulation) |
|---|---|
| "Moisturizes skin" | "Treats dry skin" |
| "Reduces the appearance of wrinkles" | "Eliminates wrinkles" |
| "Conditions hair" | "Promotes hair growth" |
| "Freshens breath" | "Prevents gingivitis" |
| "Cleanses skin" | "Kills bacteria" (antibacterial = OTC drug) |
| "Provides sun protection" | "Prevents skin cancer" |
| "Helps maintain skin's natural moisture" | "Restores skin barrier function" |
Consequence of crossing the line: FDA classifies product as unapproved new drug. Requires NDA or ANDA filing (costs USD 1M+, takes 2-5 years). Enforcement: warning letter, seizure, injunction, criminal prosecution.
SPF claims: Any sunscreen claim in the US makes the product an OTC drug under FDA monograph 21 CFR 352. Requires specific testing (FDA final sunscreen rule) and drug labeling.
FTC Substantiation Doctrine
The FTC requires "competent and reliable scientific evidence" for all advertising claims:
| Evidence Level | Acceptable For | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| Randomized controlled trial | "Clinically proven," "dermatologist recommended" | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, adequate sample size |
| Clinical study (open-label) | "Tested on [X] people" | Single-arm, before/after, statistically significant |
| Instrumental measurement | "Reduces wrinkle depth by X%" | Profilometry, corneometry, TEWL measurement |
| Consumer perception test | "X% of users felt smoother skin" | Self-assessment questionnaire, minimum 30 participants |
| In vitro / in silico | Supporting data only | Cannot be sole basis for consumer-facing claims |
| Bibliography / literature | Supporting data only | Published peer-reviewed studies on the ingredient |
Food Claims (EU + US)
EU: Nutrition & Health Claims Regulation 1924/2006
| Claim Type | Requirement | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrition claim | Must meet conditions in Annex (specific amounts) | "High in fiber" = minimum 6g fiber per 100g |
| Health claim (Art. 13) | Must be on EU Register of authorized claims | "Calcium contributes to normal bone maintenance" |
| Risk reduction claim (Art. 14) | Requires EFSA assessment + EU authorization | "Plant sterols reduce cholesterol" |
| Children's development claim | Requires EFSA assessment + EU authorization | "DHA contributes to normal brain development" |
EU Authorized Health Claims Register: ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling-nutrition/nutrition-health-claims/eu-register -- 270 authorized, 2,100+ rejected. If your claim is not on the list, you cannot use it.
US: FDA Claim Categories
| Category | FDA Oversight | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient content claim | Defined by regulation (21 CFR 101.13) | "Low fat" = 3g or less per serving |
| Structure/function claim | No pre-approval; requires 30-day notification to FDA + disclaimer | "Supports immune health" + disclaimer |
| Health claim (authorized) | FDA-authorized (12 CFR 101.72-83) | "Calcium may reduce osteoporosis risk" |
| Qualified health claim | FDA enforcement discretion letter | Lower evidence standard, specific qualifying language required |
Green Claims (EU Green Claims Directive 2024/825)
Effective March 2026. Kills vague environmental marketing.
| Prohibited | Why | Compliant Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| "Eco-friendly" (generic) | Vague, unverifiable | Specific: "Packaging is 80% recycled PET" |
| "Green" (without specifics) | Meaningless without data | "Carbon footprint: 2.1 kg CO2e per unit" |
| "Sustainable" (unqualified) | Must specify which aspect | "Ingredients sourced from certified organic farms (EU 2018/848)" |
| "Climate neutral" / "carbon neutral" | Must be based on recognized methodology, not just offsets | Remove or provide full lifecycle assessment |
| "Natural" (with synthetic ingredients) | Misleading composition claim | "Contains 92% naturally derived ingredients (ISO 16128)" |
| "Biodegradable" (without test) | Must prove biodegradation per OECD 301/302 | "Biodegradable per OECD 301B (62% in 28 days)" |
Evidence requirements under Green Claims Directive:
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) per ISO 14040/14044
- Third-party verification of claims
- Publicly accessible substantiation
- Penalties: up to 4% of annual turnover per member state
Claims Substantiation File Template
CLAIMS DOSSIER -- [Product Name] -- [Date]
CLAIM: "[exact wording]"
MARKETS: [where the claim will appear]
MEDIUM: [packaging / website / advertising / social media]
CLASSIFICATION:
Type: [cosmetic / health / nutrition / environmental / structure-function]
EU 655/2013 criteria: [all 6 met? Y/N per criterion]
US drug/cosmetic line: [cosmetic side / drug side]
EVIDENCE:
Study type: [RCT / clinical / instrumental / consumer perception / in vitro / bibliography]
Study reference: [title, lab, date, sample size]
Key result: [metric, statistical significance]
Study limitations: [list]
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
[Additional studies, literature, supplier data]
RISK ASSESSMENT:
Regulatory risk: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH]
Alternative wording (lower risk): "[suggested safer claim]"
APPROVAL:
Regulatory reviewer: [name]
Date approved: [date]
Review date: [next review -- annual minimum]
Power This With the Cleo Legal API
Without the API, this skill relies on web search and your existing knowledge — slower, less accurate, no monitoring of authorized-claims registers.
With the Cleo Legal API at https://legaldata-public.cleolabs.co:
GET /v2/search?q=green+claims+directive&country=EU— pull current authorized/prohibited claims regulations across 1,479 sources in 131 countriesGET /v2/search?q=Regulation+1924/2006&type=regulation— fetch the full EU authorized health claims register (270 authorized, 2,100+ rejected) before you green-light a claimPOST /v2/compliance/check— validate that an ingredient + claim combination is consistent across EU/US/UK in one call (composite endpoint)POST /v2/webhooks— subscribe to FTC, EU Green Claims Directive, and authorized-claims-list updates so banned claims disappear from your packaging before enforcement hits
Turns "is this claim legal?" from a 90-minute multi-tab research session into a single API call with cited primary sources.
Get started:
# 1. Sign up for free at https://legaldata-public.cleolabs.co
# 2. Get your API key (3 lifetime requests free, then €349/mo for 1M)
# 3. Install the MCP server:
claude mcp add cleo-legal-api https://api.legaldata.cleolabs.co/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer ld_live_YOUR_KEY"
Tested ROI: Replaces 2 hours of authorized-claim register lookups per claim with one API call. For a brand with 30 SKU claims, that is 60 hours/year saved — and avoids 4% turnover fines under the Green Claims Directive.
Common Mistakes
- "Clinically proven" without a clinical study: This is the #1 enforcement trigger in EU and US. "Clinically proven" requires an actual clinical study with statistical significance on the specific product (not just the ingredient).
- Cosmetic claim that crosses into drug territory: "Reduces acne" = drug claim in US. "Helps maintain clear skin" = cosmetic claim. One word changes your regulatory category and compliance cost by 10-100x.
- Using unauthorized health claims in EU: The EU maintains a closed list of authorized health claims. If the claim is not on the list, it is illegal. "Boosts immunity" is NOT authorized.
- "Natural" or "organic" without certification: ISO 16128 defines natural/organic percentages. COSMOS/NATRUE/USDA Organic provide certification. Using "organic" without certification = enforcement.
- Green claims without LCA: The EU Green Claims Directive requires lifecycle assessment evidence. "Eco-friendly" packaging without an LCA documenting the environmental benefit = greenwashing = fines up to 4% of turnover.
- Forgetting social media is advertising: Claims on Instagram, TikTok, and influencer content are subject to the same substantiation requirements as packaging claims. FTC and EU authorities actively enforce.