L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

jfi-data-analysis

jfi-data-analysis

Use when planning or stress-testing the analysis behind a Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) paper — bank/loan-level panel work, demand-absorbing specifications, and the robustness battery for empirics, or numerical examples and calibrated illustrations for theory. It guides the analysis plan; it does not replace running the code.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: jfi-data-analysis description: Use when planning or stress-testing the analysis behind a Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) paper — bank/loan-level panel work, demand-absorbing specifications, and the robustness battery for empirics, or numerical examples and calibrated illustrations for theory. It guides the analysis plan; it does not replace running the code.

Data Analysis (jfi-data-analysis)

When to trigger

  • Building the empirical analysis on bank/firm/loan data, or its robustness battery
  • Building a numerical example or calibration that illustrates a model's mechanism

Empirical track (banking data)

  • Sample construction: document the universe (e.g., Call Reports / FR Y-9C banks, DealScan loans, HMDA mortgages), merge keys, and every filter; intermediation samples are sensitive to mergers, charter changes, and reporting breaks.
  • Variables: define balance-sheet and credit quantities precisely (levels vs. growth, winsorizing, deflation); state timing relative to the shock to avoid mechanical reverse causality.
  • Specifications: high-dimensional fixed effects (reghdfe / fixest); for credit-supply questions, use firm×time effects in matched lender–borrower panels to absorb demand.
  • Robustness: alternative samples and windows, placebo periods, leave-one-out by large institutions, alternative clustering, and a balance/parallel-trends check for DID. The expected battery is substantial but there is no fixed robustness-table count; keep the main text compact and push secondary checks to appendices.

Theory track (numerical illustration)

When the paper is a model, "data analysis" is lighter and means reproducible computation:

  • A numerical example or calibrated figure showing the mechanism and comparative statics — illustrative, not estimation.
  • Keep the code clean and deterministic (fixed seeds/parameters) so a reader can regenerate every figure.

Data sharing (both tracks)

Prepare a Data Statement and link datasets via Editorial Manager; cite data with the [dataset] tag (see jfi-replication-and-data-policy). Under Elsevier Option C, deposit/cite/link research data where possible or explain why sharing is restricted.

Dataset-to-mechanism decision table

Pick data for the intermediation mechanism, not the other way around — JFI referees notice when the dataset cannot carry the claimed channel:

Mechanism under studyWorkhorse dataWhat the merge must support
Relationship lending / information captureCredit register or DealScan loan-levelMulti-bank firms, so firm×time absorption is feasible
Capital / regulation transmissionCall Reports, FR Y-9C, stress-test exposuresBank-level shock measured before announcement
Deposit competition / franchise valueFDIC Summary of Deposits, branch-level ratesMarket-level (county/MSA) shares and pricing
Runs, liquidity, interbank stressSupervisory or payment-system records (typically restricted)Daily/weekly frequency around the stress window
Fintech displacement of banksPlatform loan tapes plus bank comparatorsComparable borrower-risk controls across lender types

Worked robustness pass: a capital-shock battery (illustrative)

A hypothetical JFI paper estimates that a 1pp rise in required capital cuts loan growth to the same firm by 2.1pp (s.e. 0.6, firm×time FE, clustered by bank). The battery a JFI referee expects, each row tied to a named threat:

  • OLS without firm×time FE gives −3.0pp; report both, so the reader sees demand absorption moves the estimate by roughly a third — evidence the design bites, and a sorting fact worth a paragraph.
  • Drop the three largest banking groups: −1.9pp — the channel is not one institution.
  • Placebo reform date two years earlier: +0.2pp, insignificant — supports timing.
  • Extensive margin (relationship termination) rises 1.4pp — the intermediation mechanism shows up beyond intensive-margin amounts.
  • Few-cluster check: wild-cluster bootstrap p ≈ 0.03 with 31 banks.
  • Multi-bank vs. full sample: re-estimate firm-FE-only specs on both, since the within-firm identifying sample skews toward larger, less bank-dependent borrowers.

Analysis probes specific to this venue

  • Referees here routinely ask for the exposure-weighted firm-level aggregation when real outcomes (investment, employment) are claimed — firm×time FE cannot be used there, so pre-shock bank shares must carry the identification.
  • Magnitude sanity: convert the loan-level coefficient into aggregate credit terms and benchmark it against the range in the lending-channel literature; an estimate ten times the consensus invites a measurement question before a citation.
  • For the theory track, a calibration table listing every parameter, its value, and its source (moment matched, literature, normalization) is the JFI-credible substitute for a robustness battery.

Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)

Run the battery, don't just enumerate it. Full map: execution-with-mcp. JFI is banking and financial intermediation — typically corporate / bank causal designs built around regulation and shocks.

  • Many outcomes / specifications: romano_wolf (step-down FWER, accounts for cross-test correlation) or benjamini_hochberg — report the adjusted threshold.
  • OVB sensitivity: oster_delta / sensemakr — the confounder strength that would overturn the headline.
  • Inference: wild_cluster_bootstrap (few clusters), twoway_cluster / conley.
  • Re-fit off one handle: audit_result(result_id) lists the missing checks and the exact suggest_function for each — no guessing the battery.
  • Exhibits: etable / did_summary_to_latex from the handle — no retyped numbers.

Keep the decisive checks in the body and the exhaustive (now actually-run) battery in the appendix. See the executed chain in the JF execution walkthrough.

Anti-patterns

  • Undocumented sample filters that drive the result
  • Mixing credit supply and demand without firm×time absorption
  • A theory "calibration" presented as if it were estimation
  • Non-reproducible figures (random seeds, manual steps)

Output format

【Track】empirical / theory
【Sample / parameters】<universe + filters, or calibration>
【Core spec / example】<FE structure, or the numerical illustration>
【Robustness】<the battery, or seed/determinism notes>
【Next skill】jfi-contribution-framing
Skills enregistrées