---

name: mobisys-supplementary description: Use when preparing MobiSys supplementary material — appendices, extra device sweeps, protocol details, demo video and media, and anonymized artifacts under the 12-page-body, double-blind, and reviewer-discretion constraints, including how to split a mobile-systems paper between body, references-and-appendix overflow, and HotCRP fields.

MobiSys Supplementary

Use this when assembling MobiSys supplementary material. The supplement can support the paper, but the 12-page double-column body must stand on its own — a reviewer may never open it.

Supplement structure

• Put full protocols, extra device sweeps, additional ablations, and per-device tables in a clean appendix after the references (outside the 12-page cap).
• Put a demo video or media where the contribution is an interactive service or a user-facing behavior a static figure cannot convey; MobiSys work often lives or dies on the demo.
• Put executable assets in the artifact package rather than the appendix when the current HotCRP form separates them (mobisys-artifact-evaluation).
• Keep all supplementary files double-blind: no author names, institutions, acknowledgements, device serial numbers, account handles in screenshots, internal codenames, or repository owners in trace paths.
• Do not use the supplement to hide essential motivation, the core system description, the headline device results, or the key design decisions.
• Verify archives and media open on a clean machine, render without your account, and contain no credentials, caches, or hidden OS metadata.

Body / appendix / media split

Content	Where it goes	Why
System design, headline latency + energy figures, accuracy-cost table	12-page body	The paper must be judgeable without the supplement
Full workload traces, per-device sweeps, extended ablations	Appendix after references	Supports the body under reviewer discretion
Interactive behavior, UI, real-time feel	Demo video/media	A CDF cannot show a user-facing service
Runnable code, scripts, model files	Artifact package	Evaluated by the AEC, not read as prose

Appendix architecture

• Order appendix sections to mirror the body's experiment order; systems reviewers navigate by figure and section number, not by page.
• Restate the setup before each extended result so the appendix reads standalone without flipping back to the double-column body.
• Cross-reference every appendix table and figure from the body at least once; orphaned supplement material is invisible under reviewer discretion.
• Keep the demo media short and self-explanatory; assume it is watched once, muted, at speed.

Vignette: splitting an on-device runtime paper

A submission presenting a thermal-aware inference runtime, plus device studies: the body keeps the design, the latency-under-load curve, the energy-per-frame figure, and the accuracy-cost table; the appendix holds the four-device sweep and the full workload traces; a 90-second demo video shows the frame rate holding as the phone heats; the artifact carries the runtime and the measurement scripts. Nothing decision-critical lives only in the appendix or the video, because both are discretionary.

Output format

[Supplement status] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Body/appendix/media split] <what sits where, gaps flagged>
[Files] <appendix / demo video / traces / artifact>
[Anonymity checks] <passed / issues incl. screenshots and trace paths>
[Main-paper dependency] <what breaks if the supplement is ignored>