L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Design et création · SKILL.md

gcb-figures-and-tables

gcb-figures-and-tables

Use when building figures, tables, and the mandatory graphical abstract for a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript. GCB rewards mechanism-first, self-contained, accessible exhibits and requires a graphical abstract depicting the driver-to-response link. Guides exhibit design; it does not invent data.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: gcb-figures-and-tables description: Use when building figures, tables, and the mandatory graphical abstract for a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript. GCB rewards mechanism-first, self-contained, accessible exhibits and requires a graphical abstract depicting the driver-to-response link. Guides exhibit design; it does not invent data.

Figures & Tables (gcb-figures-and-tables)

In GCB, exhibits carry the mechanism. The strongest papers show a clear driver → biological response relationship in the main figures, with uncertainty visible. GCB also requires a graphical abstract that depicts the mechanistic link (not a site map or phylogeny). Verify current figure specs on the live guidelines page before submission.

When to trigger

  • Designing the main-figure sequence to tell the mechanistic story
  • Building the graphical abstract
  • Preparing maps, flux/time-series, dose-response, or forest plots
  • Checking accessibility, resolution, and self-containment before submission

What GCB rewards

  1. Mechanism-first main figures. Lead with the driver-response relationship; relegate site maps and descriptive context to supporting figures unless they carry the argument.
  2. Visible uncertainty. Confidence/credible ribbons, error bars, ensemble spread — uncertainty is part of the result, not optional decoration.
  3. A strong graphical abstract. One concise figure linking an environmental driver to a biological response; it is the reader's first impression.
  4. Self-contained exhibits. Each figure/table readable from its caption alone (units, n, sample, statistic, scale).
  5. Accessibility. Colour-blind-safe palettes (viridis, Okabe-Ito), legible in grayscale; vector line art; live-check the current resolution and file-format specifications.

Tables

  • Report effect sizes with intervals and units; define every symbol and abbreviation in the caption.
  • Keep tables for precise numbers; move relationships and patterns into figures.

Exhibit-by-exhibit expectations

Different exhibit types carry different burdens at GCB. Use this as a per-panel design contract before you finalize the figure set.

ExhibitCarriesMust showCommon reject note
Graphical abstractThe driver → response linkA causal arrow from environmental driver to biological responseA site map or phylogeny standing in for mechanism
Flux / time-series panelTrend and its uncertaintyConfidence ribbon and the sampling unitA bare line with no spread
MapSpatial patternColour-blind-safe ramp, scale bar, projectionRainbow ramp, no scale, undefined extent
Dose-responseMechanism shapeFitted curve with interval and the dataCurve drawn through points with no band
Forest plot (synthesis)Pooled effect + heterogeneityPer-study and pooled effect with CIsPooled diamond only, studies hidden

Worked micro-example (illustrative)

A remote-sensing study of carbon flux wants one mechanistic main figure. A site map of the eddy-covariance towers is supporting material, not the lead. The lead panel plots gross primary productivity against growing-season temperature with a fitted ribbon: GPP rises then saturates near an illustrative 22 C, with the ensemble spread shaded. The caption states n = 18 site-years (illustrative), the statistic, the units (g C m^-2 d^-1), and reads alone. The graphical abstract distils this to a single arrow: warming → productivity saturation → weakening land carbon sink. Numbers illustrative.

Reviewer pushback on exhibits and the fix

  • "Figure 1 is a map; where is the mechanism?" → promote the driver-response panel to lead; demote the map to supporting information.
  • "Point estimates only" → add ribbons, error bars, or ensemble spread so uncertainty is visible.
  • "Unreadable in grayscale / rainbow map" → switch to viridis or Okabe-Ito and verify grayscale legibility.
  • "Caption not self-contained" → add n, units, statistic, and scale so the exhibit stands without the methods.

Anti-patterns

  • A graphical abstract that is a study-site map or phylogeny instead of the driver-response mechanism
  • Main figures that describe the site rather than show the mechanism
  • Plots with no uncertainty (point estimates only)
  • Rainbow/jet colour maps; figures unreadable in grayscale or by colour-blind readers
  • Captions that require the methods section to interpret the figure

Output format

【Graphical abstract】shows driver → response mechanism? [Y/N]
【Main-figure story】mechanism-first sequence? [Y/N]
【Uncertainty shown】ribbons / bars / ensemble spread? [Y/N]
【Self-contained】each caption stands alone (units, n, stat)? [Y/N]
【Accessible】colour-blind-safe + grayscale-legible + resolution? [Y/N]
【Next】gcb-reporting-and-data-policy

Supplementary resources

Skills enregistrées