L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

ylj-sources-and-bluebook

ylj-sources-and-bluebook

Use when building and formatting the citation apparatus for a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece — pinpoint cites, Bluebook form, and source support for every assertion. It governs cite construction; the final editorial cite-check and source-pull is ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: ylj-sources-and-bluebook description: Use when building and formatting the citation apparatus for a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece — pinpoint cites, Bluebook form, and source support for every assertion. It governs cite construction; the final editorial cite-check and source-pull is ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check.

Sources & Bluebook (ylj-sources-and-bluebook)

Legal scholarship is carried in its footnotes, and YLJ formats them in Bluebook form (The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation), supplemented by the Journal's own citation requirements. Every sentence that asserts law or fact carries a footnote with a pinpoint cite to authority that actually supports it. This skill builds correct, supported cites as you draft; the line-by-line editorial verify happens later in ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check.

When to trigger

  • Drafting any sentence that states what the law is, what a court held, or a fact
  • Unsure of Bluebook form for a case, statute, regulation, book, or article
  • A footnote cites a source generally instead of to the exact page/section
  • Preparing the manuscript so student editors can source-pull every footnote

Core rules YLJ editors enforce

  • A cite for every proposition. Assertions of law and fact are footnoted; unsupported claims get flagged in source-pull.
  • Pinpoint, always. Cite the exact page (id. at 412), section (§ 1983), or paragraph — never just the first page of a long opinion when you rely on a holding deep inside it.
  • The source must actually say it. A cite that doesn't support the sentence is the single most common source-pull failure; quote or paraphrase only what the page contains.
  • Bluebook form by source type (typeface, order of authorities, signals, short forms):
SourceSkeleton (Bluebook)
CaseName v. Name, Vol Reporter Page, pin (Court Year).
StatuteTitle U.S.C. § X (Year).
RegulationVol C.F.R. § X (Year).
BookAuthor, Title Page (ed. Year).
Law-review articleAuthor, Title, Vol Journal Page, pin (Year).
Short formsid.; supra note N; hereinafter, used consistently.

Signals and explanatory parentheticals

  • Use introductory signals precisely — See, See also, Cf., But see, Contra, E.g. — each means a different relationship between the cite and the text; misuse signals to a reader (and a source-puller) that you misread the source.
  • Add explanatory parentheticals for any cite whose relevance isn't obvious from the text — they prove you read the source and save editors a step.
  • Order string cites by the Bluebook hierarchy of authorities; don't list cases alphabetically.

Quotations and paraphrase

  • Verbatim language needs quotation marks and a pinpoint cite; paraphrase still needs a cite to the Bluebook + the Journal's requirements. Cleaning up another's words without quotation marks is a source-pull and integrity failure.
  • For altered quotations use the Bluebook conventions ([ ], . . ., (emphasis added)).

Checklist

  • Every law/fact assertion has a footnote
  • Every cite is pinpointed to the page/section relied on
  • The cited source actually supports the proposition (spot-check the hardest ones)
  • Bluebook form correct per source type; short forms (id., supra) consistent
  • Signals chosen deliberately; explanatory parentheticals where relevance isn't obvious
  • Quotations marked and pinpointed; alterations flagged per Bluebook

Anti-patterns

  • "String of see-cites" with no pinpoints — guarantees source-pull friction
  • A cite to the first page of a 40-page opinion for a holding buried at page 38
  • Wrong signal (See where the source directly states it, or vice versa)
  • Paraphrase that tracks the source's wording without quotation marks (integrity flag)
  • Deferring all Bluebook formatting to "the editors will fix it" — they cite-check, they don't ghostwrite

Output format

【Apparatus state】% of assertions footnoted; pinpoints present? Y/N
【Bluebook form】case/statute/article skeletons applied consistently? Y/N
【Signals】used deliberately? Y/N
【Quotations】marked + pinpointed + alterations flagged? Y/N
【Next】ylj-writing-style for prose, then ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check for the full verify

Supplementary resources

Skills enregistrées