L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

wacv-workflow

wacv-workflow

Use when planning a WACV campaign calendar across the two-round model, from track and round choice through the Round 1 submission, rebuttal, and Accept/Revise-and-Resubmit/Reject decision, into the Round 2 revision and decision, camera-ready, and the winter conference — with the branch points that a single-deadline plan misses.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: wacv-workflow description: Use when planning a WACV campaign calendar across the two-round model, from track and round choice through the Round 1 submission, rebuttal, and Accept/Revise-and-Resubmit/Reject decision, into the Round 2 revision and decision, camera-ready, and the winter conference — with the branch points that a single-deadline plan misses.

WACV Workflow

Use this to run a WACV campaign end to end. The defining feature is that WACV has two rounds with a revision path between them, so the calendar is a branching tree, not a single deadline. Dates below are the reported WACV 2027 timetable read on 2026-07-09 (via search rendering — reconfirm on the live Dates page); the structure is stable, the exact dates are not.

The branching calendar

Track + round decision  ──► Round 1 paper deadline (reported Jun 26, 2026)
                              │
                              ├─ R1 reviews (reported due Jul 24) ─► optional 1-page rebuttal
                              │
                              └─ R1 decision (reported Aug 7)
                                   ├─ Accept  ──────────────► camera-ready
                                   ├─ Reject  ──────────────► re-target / rebuild
                                   └─ Revise & Resubmit ─► revise + change summary
                                                                │
                                        Round 2 deadline (reported Aug 28) ◄─ new R2 papers also enter here
                                                                │
                                        R2 reviews (reported due Sep 25) ─ (no rebuttal)
                                                                │
                                        R2 decision (reported Oct 9) ─► Accept / Reject
                                                                │
                                        registration (reported Nov 2) ─► winter conference (Jan 2027, 待核实)

Phase-by-phase

PhaseDo thisSkill
ScopeDecide WACV vs sibling, Applications vs Algorithms, and R1 vs R2wacv-topic-selection
DraftWrite the first page for the chosen track and the two-round reviewerwacv-writing-style
EvidenceBuild matched-baseline, constraint-aware experiments with uncertaintywacv-experiments, wacv-reproducibility
Submit R1Audit anonymity, profiles, page cap, track fieldwacv-submission, wacv-supplementary
R1 reviewsDraft the optional one-page rebuttal, AC-firstwacv-author-response, wacv-review-process
R&R lapExecute the revision as a spec; write the change summary; sync the artifactwacv-author-response, wacv-artifact-evaluation
Camera-readyDe-anonymize, finalize for CVF open access + IEEE Xplorewacv-camera-ready
PresentPrepare the winter conference talk/posterwacv-camera-ready

Branch points a single-deadline plan misses

  • Round choice is a scheduling decision, not just a deadline. A borderline paper belongs in Round 1 (rebuttal + Revise-and-Resubmit net); a polished one can go to Round 2. Deciding this late forfeits the safety net.
  • The Revise-and-Resubmit lap is the main event, not a detour. Most WACV papers pass through it; budget real engineering time for the revision between the R1 decision and the R2 deadline, because Round 2 has no rebuttal to compensate for a rushed revision.
  • Two OpenReview groups. Round 1 and Round 2 are distinct groups; do not assume a single submission carries over automatically — follow the current instructions for resubmitting a Revise-and-Resubmit paper.

A worked mini-plan (borderline applications paper)

T-3 wk: freeze track = Applications; target Round 1 for the R&R net
T-2 wk: matched-budget baselines re-run; uncertainty over seeds/sessions locked
T-1 wk: anonymity + profile + page-cap audit (wacv-submission)
  R1 deadline: submit
+reviews: one-page rebuttal fixes the top factual objection
  R1 = Revise & Resubmit: turn the three reviews into a change list; execute; write summary
  R2 deadline: resubmit revised paper + change summary
  R2 = Accept: camera-ready; register by the deadline; prep winter poster

Reverify each cycle

  • Both round deadlines, the review/decision dates, and the registration deadline.
  • Whether the two-round model and the three R1 outcomes still hold.
  • The camera-ready deadline and the winter conference dates/location (2027 dates 待核实).

Output format

[Current phase] scope / draft / R1 submit / R1 reviews / R&R / R2 / camera-ready / present
[Round + track] R1|R2 · Applications|Algorithms
[Next hard date] <deadline> — <what it gates>
[Branch risk] <the decision that, if made late, forfeits the R&R net>
[Next skill] <which WACV skill to open now>
Skills enregistrées