L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

isca-workflow

isca-workflow

Use when planning a full ISCA campaign on a calendar — working back from the expected mid-November abstract and paper deadlines to freeze simulation evidence in time, staffing the winter two-round review wait, preparing for the February-March rebuttal and revision window, and branching to camera-ready, artifacts, and the June conference.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: isca-workflow description: Use when planning a full ISCA campaign on a calendar — working back from the expected mid-November abstract and paper deadlines to freeze simulation evidence in time, staffing the winter two-round review wait, preparing for the February-March rebuttal and revision window, and branching to camera-ready, artifacts, and the June conference.

ISCA Workflow

An ISCA year has one gate. Miss mid-November and the next identical opportunity is twelve months away, which is why experienced groups treat the ISCA calendar as an engineering schedule with the deadline as tape-out. This skill lays out that schedule using the verified ISCA 2026 dates as the template; as of 2026-07-08 the ISCA 2027 CFP was not yet posted, so every 2027 date below is an expectation to confirm against iscaconf.org/isca2027/ the moment it exists (待核实).

The verified 2026-cycle skeleton

MilestoneISCA 2026 date (verified)What it means operationally
Abstract registrationNovember 10, 2025Title, abstract, authors, conflicts locked in HotCRP; paper content still fluid
Full paperNovember 17, 2025The reviewed PDF — one week after abstracts, so the abstract week is a writing week, not a buffer
Round 1 reviews dueDecember 19, 2025First reviewer wave completes before the holidays
Round 2 reviews dueFebruary 13, 2026Additional reviews on papers that advanced
Rebuttal + revisionFebruary 16 - March 6, 2026Authors see reviews, respond, and may revise — a three-week working window
ConferenceJune 27 - July 1, 2026 (Raleigh, NC)Presentation; artifact badges resolved before publication

Industry-track submissions ran about a month behind (abstracts December 5, papers December 12, 2025). Final notification date for 2026 was not captured in this pack's verification — 待核实.

Working backward from November

Count in weeks from the expected paper deadline (call it P, likely mid-November 2026 for ISCA 2027):

  • P minus 16 weeks (late July): venue decision final (isca-topic-selection); simulation or prototype infrastructure chosen and validated (isca-experiments); the one-sentence claim written on the whiteboard.
  • P minus 10 weeks: baseline configurations frozen and reproduced from scratch by a second person. Baseline drift discovered later invalidates every downstream number.
  • P minus 6 weeks: main-result experiments complete. From here, compute goes to sensitivity studies and reviewer-anticipation runs, not to the headline.
  • P minus 4 weeks: full draft exists — bad prose, complete structure. Internal "mock PC" read by two colleagues who did not build the system.
  • P minus 1 week (abstract deadline): title/abstract/topics/conflicts final in HotCRP. The abstract steers reviewer assignment; write it for bidding, not as a placeholder.
  • P: upload per isca-submission, then freeze the artifact snapshot that matches the submitted numbers (isca-reproducibility).

The winter: silence, then three loud weeks

Between November and mid-February the authors' only jobs are (a) keep the evaluation environment resurrectable and (b) pre-build rebuttal ammunition: the five most likely objections, each with a ready experiment or a pointer into the submitted PDF. The 2026 cycle then opened a combined rebuttal/revision period (February 16 - March 6) — unusually long by conference standards precisely because ISCA lets authors change the paper, not just argue about it. Staff those three weeks like a sprint: compute reserved, coauthors on call, no conference travel booked. Details of what to do inside the window live in isca-author-response.

Branch plans after notification

  • Accept: camera-ready under the edition's publisher workflow (isca-camera-ready), voluntary artifact submission (isca-artifact-evaluation), talk and travel for late June.
  • Reject with salvageable reviews: map every misunderstanding to the sentence that permitted it; decide MICRO (spring gate) vs HPCA (summer gate) within two weeks while the reviews are fresh.
  • Reject with a fit objection: rerun isca-topic-selection honestly — the committee may have told you the paper's true venue.

Team ledger

Keep a single tracking file in the paper repo; every risk has one owner.

# isca-campaign.yaml
target: ISCA 2027            # 54th by arithmetic - ordinal 待核实
gate:
  abstract: TBD-2026-11      # confirm on iscaconf.org/isca2027 when live
  paper:    TBD-2026-11
  source:   "not yet posted as of 2026-07-08"
owners:
  claim_and_story:   <name>   # one sentence, defended weekly
  simulation_infra:  <name>   # versions pinned, configs archived
  baselines:         <name>   # frozen P-10w, independently reproduced
  writing:           <name>   # draft complete P-4w
  submission_admin:  <name>   # HotCRP, conflicts, template, metadata
  rebuttal_reserve:  <name>   # compute + calendar hold, mid-Feb to early Mar
checks:
  - abstract written for reviewer bidding, not filler
  - artifact snapshot tagged at submission commit
  - mock-PC read completed and objections filed
  - fallback venue named with trigger condition

Failure modes this calendar prevents

  • The November collision: abstract and paper a week apart means groups that planned "we'll write after the abstract" write the whole paper in seven days. The P-4w draft rule exists for this.
  • The dead environment: rebuttal-window experiments that fail because the simulator tree no longer builds in February. Tag and containerize at submission.
  • The unstaffed revision: ISCA's revision option is leverage only for teams that can produce new results in days; treat the window as scheduled work.
  • The stale retarget: rejected papers resubmitted unchanged to MICRO carry their ISCA reviews' fingerprints; committees overlap. Budget a real revision.

Milestone-to-skill routing

When you are at...Open...
Venue decision (P-16w)isca-topic-selection, exemplars library
Infrastructure setupisca-experiments, isca-reproducibility
Drafting (P-6w to P-1w)isca-writing-style, isca-related-work, isca-supplementary
Upload weekisca-submission (twice: abstract step, paper step)
Winter waitisca-review-process
February windowisca-author-response
Post-decisionisca-camera-ready, isca-artifact-evaluation, or the retarget branch

All dates above are the 2026-cycle record (../../resources/official-source-map.md, checked 2026-07-08). Confirm the 2027 calendar, page rules, and review mechanics on the official site before acting on any of them.

Skills enregistrées