L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

soc2-audit-prep

soc2-audit-prep

SOC 2 audit-prep playbook: the 4/8/12-week sprint to audit-ready for a Type I or Type II observation. Use when the audit is scheduled, when readiness assessment surfaced gaps and you need a sprint plan, or when evidence is missing or stale.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: soc2-audit-prep description: > SOC 2 audit-prep playbook: the 4/8/12-week sprint to audit-ready for a Type I or Type II observation. Use when the audit is scheduled, when readiness assessment surfaced gaps and you need a sprint plan, or when evidence is missing or stale. license: MIT + Commons Clause metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: borghei category: compliance domain: ra-qm-team updated: 2026-05-27 tags: [soc2, audit-prep, trust-services-criteria, evidence-collection, sprint-planning, compliance]

SOC 2 Audit Prep

Operational playbook for SOC 2 audit preparation. Designed to be picked up 4-12 weeks before an audit and run as a sprint to closure. Pairs with our deep ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance-expert skill (which builds the program from scratch).

When to use this skill vs. soc2-compliance-expert:

  • This skill: audit scheduled in 4-12 weeks; gaps known; need to execute the sprint
  • soc2-compliance-expert: building the SOC 2 program; designing controls; multi-quarter effort

When to use this skill

SituationSkill applies
SOC 2 audit scheduled, need readiness sprintYes — start here
Type I audit in 4-12 weeksYes — use 4 or 8-week sprint plan
Type II observation period closing soonYes — use 12-week sprint plan
Readiness assessment surfaced gapsYes — scripts/soc2_readiness_score.py + evidence_gap_finder.py
Building SOC 2 program from scratchUse ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance-expert instead

The audit-prep sprint at a glance

4-week sprint (Type I, mostly ready)

Week 1: Inventory + scoping
  - Confirm Trust Services Criteria scope (always Security; plus chosen others)
  - Pull current evidence per criterion
  - Identify gaps via scripts/evidence_gap_finder.py
  - Auditor kickoff scheduled

Week 2: Gap closure
  - Policy updates / approvals
  - Technical control fixes (MFA universal, logging coverage, etc.)
  - Evidence retrieval (access reviews, change tickets, on-call records)
  - Auditor information request preparation

Week 3: Evidence finalization
  - All evidence packets compiled per criterion
  - Walkthroughs / interviews scheduled with key control owners
  - Findings remediation
  - Pre-audit checkpoint with auditor (informal)

Week 4: Audit week
  - Walkthroughs executed
  - Sample testing
  - Q&A
  - Management responses to findings

8-week sprint (Type I, gaps remaining)

Weeks 1-2: Inventory + scoping + gap identification (same as 4-week W1)
Weeks 3-5: Gap closure (policies, technical, process)
Weeks 6-7: Evidence finalization + walkthroughs
Week 8: Audit week

12-week sprint (Type II observation prep)

Weeks 1-2: Inventory + scope + gap identification + auditor kickoff
Weeks 3-4: Gap closure
Weeks 5-12: Observation period (controls operating; evidence accumulating)
After observation period: audit week

See references/evidence-collection-sprint-plan.md for the detailed week-by-week plans.


The pre-audit punch list

Standard pre-audit punch list, organized by Trust Services Criterion:

CC1-CC5 (Common Criteria — control environment)

  • Information security policy approved + dated within 12 months
  • Org chart current (reflects actual reporting lines)
  • Risk assessment performed + documented within 12 months
  • Board / leadership oversight evidence (minutes referencing security)
  • Code of conduct signed by all employees
  • Background checks documented for all hires

CC6 (Logical and Physical Access)

  • SSO enforced for all production systems
  • MFA universal (no exceptions documented for production access)
  • Access review evidence (quarterly minimum)
  • Privileged access management (PAM) for admin/root accounts
  • Physical security evidence (office badge logs, data center attestation)
  • Encryption at rest / in transit verified

CC7 (System Operations)

  • Vulnerability management evidence (scans, remediation tracking)
  • Monitoring and alerting documented + tested
  • Incident response plan + documented incidents from past period
  • Business continuity / DR plan + test evidence
  • Backup verification (not just configured — tested restore)

CC8 (Change Management)

  • Code change tickets with peer review + approval
  • Production deployment evidence (who, what, when, approvers)
  • Emergency change process documented + sample tickets

CC9 (Risk Mitigation / Vendors)

  • Vendor inventory current
  • Vendor due diligence evidence per vendor
  • Vendor SOC 2 reports collected (annual)

A1 (Availability — if in scope)

  • SLA monitoring + actuals
  • Capacity planning evidence
  • Recovery objective testing (RTO/RPO)

PI1 (Processing Integrity — if in scope)

  • Data validation controls documented
  • Error handling + reconciliation evidence

C1 (Confidentiality — if in scope)

  • Data classification + handling procedures
  • Encryption verified

P1 (Privacy — if in scope)

  • Privacy notice published + dated
  • Data subject rights process documented
  • Consent management evidence

See references/soc2-pre-audit-punch-list.md for the detailed punch list with evidence templates per item.


Clarify First

Before running the audit-prep sprint, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • Audit type — Type I (point-in-time) vs Type II (observation period) (sets the 4/8 vs 12-week sprint and the evidence-over-time requirement)
  • TSC scope — which Trust Services Criteria beyond mandatory Security (Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) (determines which punch-list sections apply)
  • Readiness score / gap level — picks the 4-week vs 8-week vs 12-week sprint (or postpone)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the sprint plan.

Quick start

  1. Run readiness score: python3 scripts/soc2_readiness_score.py --config controls.yaml
  2. Identify evidence gaps: python3 scripts/evidence_gap_finder.py --evidence evidence.yaml --tsc CC6
  3. Pick sprint length based on score:
    • Score > 90: 4-week sprint
    • Score 75-90: 8-week sprint
    • Score < 75: 12-week sprint or postpone audit
  4. Execute sprint per references/evidence-collection-sprint-plan.md
  5. Pre-audit checkpoint with auditor 1 week before

Common audit-prep failures

  • No designated audit owner. Sprint flounders. Assign one person Day 1.
  • Treating evidence as one-time. Type II requires controls operating over observation period. Evidence must accumulate continuously, not just at the end.
  • Untested backups. Configuring backups isn't enough; you need restore test evidence.
  • Access review checked but not enforced. Reviews happen; access not actually removed when flagged.
  • Vendor SOC 2 reports missing or stale. Audit checks subservice org evidence.
  • No incident in observation period. Looks suspicious to auditors. Either you had none (unusual) or you're not detecting them.
  • Late discovery of carve-out vs inclusive subservice orgs. Re-scoping mid-sprint is painful.

Tooling

ScriptPurpose
scripts/soc2_readiness_score.pyScore current state (0-100) per TSC; identify pillars needing attention
scripts/evidence_gap_finder.pyCross-reference required evidence vs collected; output gap list with priorities

References


Related skills

  • ra-qm-team/soc2-compliance-expert — deep SOC 2 program management (multi-quarter)
  • ra-qm-team/audit-prep/compliance-readiness — multi-framework readiness (SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + NIST)
  • ra-qm-team/infrastructure-compliance-auditor — automated infra scanning for evidence
  • engineering/observability-designer — logging / monitoring evidence
Skills enregistrées