L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

math-review

math-review

Verifies math-heavy code for algorithmic correctness and numerical stability. Use when reviewing scientific algorithms, ML models, or numerical code.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: math-review description: Verifies math-heavy code for algorithmic correctness and numerical stability. Use when reviewing scientific algorithms, ML models, or numerical code. alwaysApply: false category: specialized tags:

  • math
  • algorithms
  • numerical
  • stability
  • verification
  • scientific tools: [] usage_patterns:
  • algorithm-review
  • numerical-analysis
  • derivation-verification
  • stability-assessment complexity: advanced model_hint: deep estimated_tokens: 200 progressive_loading: true dependencies:
  • imbue:proof-of-work
  • imbue:review-core
  • imbue:structured-output

Mathematical Algorithm Review

Intensive analysis ensuring numerical stability and alignment with standards.

Quick Start

/math-review

Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

When To Use

  • Changes to mathematical models or algorithms
  • Statistical routines or probabilistic logic
  • Numerical integration or optimization
  • Scientific computing code
  • ML/AI model implementations
  • Safety-critical calculations

When NOT To Use

  • General algorithm review - use architecture-review
  • Performance optimization - use parseltongue:python-performance

Required TodoWrite Items

  1. math-review:context-synced
  2. math-review:requirements-mapped
  3. math-review:derivations-verified
  4. math-review:stability-assessed
  5. math-review:evidence-logged
  6. math-review:findings-verified

Core Workflow

1. Context Sync

pwd && git status -sb && git diff --stat origin/main..HEAD

Verification: Run git status to confirm working tree state. Enumerate math-heavy files (source, tests, docs, notebooks). Classify risk: safety-critical, financial, ML fairness.

2. Requirements Mapping

Translate requirements → mathematical invariants. Document pre/post conditions, conservation laws, bounds. Load: modules/requirements-mapping.md

3. Derivation Verification

Re-derive formulas using CAS. Challenge approximations. Cite authoritative standards (NASA-STD-7009, ASME VVUQ). Load: modules/derivation-verification.md

4. Stability Assessment

Evaluate conditioning, precision, scaling, randomness. Compare complexity. Quantify uncertainty. Load: modules/numerical-stability.md

5. Proof of Work

pytest tests/math/ --benchmark
jupyter nbconvert --execute derivation.ipynb

Verification: Run pytest -v tests/math/ to verify. Log deviations, recommend: Approve / Approve with actions / Block. Load: modules/testing-strategies.md

6. Verify Findings Are Grounded (math-review:findings-verified)

Write issues to .review/findings.json, run the citation verifier (Skill(imbue:review-core) Step 5), and drop or label UNVERIFIED any the verifier rejects.

Progressive Loading

Default (200 tokens): Core workflow, checklists +Requirements (+300 tokens): Invariants, pre/post conditions, coverage analysis +Derivation (+350 tokens): CAS verification, standards, citations +Stability (+400 tokens): Numerical properties, precision, complexity +Testing (+350 tokens): Edge cases, benchmarks, reproducibility

Total with all modules: ~1600 tokens

Essential Checklist

Correctness: Formulas match spec | Edge cases handled | Units consistent | Domain enforced Stability: Condition number OK | Precision sufficient | No cancellation | Overflow prevented Verification: Derivations documented | References cited | Tests cover invariants | Benchmarks reproducible Documentation: Assumptions stated | Limitations documented | Error bounds specified | References linked

Output Format

## Summary
[Brief findings]

## Context
Files | Risk classification | Standards

## Requirements Analysis
| Invariant | Verified | Evidence |

## Derivation Review
[Status and conflicts]

## Stability Analysis
Condition number | Precision | Risks

## Issues
[M1] [Title]
- Location: file.py:123
- Anchor: `verbatim source text at line 123`
- Issue: [what is wrong] | Fix: [remediation] | Evidence: [E1]

## Recommendation
Approve / Approve with actions / Block

Every issue's Anchor is the exact source text at Location; it is what citation_verifier.py re-reads to prove the finding is real. Verification: Run the command with --help flag to verify availability.

Exit Criteria

  • Context synced, requirements mapped, derivations verified, stability assessed, evidence logged with citations
  • Every reported issue carries a Location + verbatim Anchor, and citation_verifier.py confirmed all citations (exit 0) or unverified issues were dropped or labeled UNVERIFIED
Skills enregistrées