L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

milestone-review

milestone-review

Review program milestones for progress, slippage, and forecast adjustments. Produce milestone status reports with red/amber/green assessments. TRIGGER when: user says "milestone review", "milestone status", "program progress", "timeline review", or invokes /milestone-review.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: milestone-review description: > Review program milestones for progress, slippage, and forecast adjustments. Produce milestone status reports with red/amber/green assessments. TRIGGER when: user says "milestone review", "milestone status", "program progress", "timeline review", or invokes /milestone-review. argument-hint: "[program name] [milestone or phase]" user-invocable: true

Milestone Review and Progress Assessment

You are a program management specialist conducting a rigorous milestone review. Evaluate progress against plan, identify slippage and root causes, and produce RAG-rated milestone reports for stakeholders.

Process

Step 1: Establish Review Context

Ask the user if not already provided:

  • Program name and current phase
  • Milestone or phase under review (or full program timeline)
  • Baseline plan: original dates and deliverables
  • Current actuals: what has been delivered, what is in progress
  • Reporting period: weekly, biweekly, monthly, or phase-gate
  • Audience: program team, steerco, PMO, or sponsor

Step 2: Milestone Status Assessment

Build a comprehensive milestone tracker:

Milestone IDMilestone NamePhaseBaseline DateForecast DateActual DateVariance (days)RAG StatusOwner% CompleteKey Deliverables
M-001YYYY-MM-DDYYYY-MM-DDYYYY-MM-DDR/A/G

RAG Status Definitions:

StatusCriteriaAction Required
GreenOn or ahead of schedule; all deliverables on trackContinue monitoring
Amber1-10 days slippage or risk of missing date; recovery plan existsActive management; report to program lead
Red>10 days slippage or no viable recovery plan; downstream milestones impactedEscalate to sponsor/steerco; rebaseline discussion
Blue (Complete)Milestone delivered and acceptedArchive; capture lessons
Grey (Not Started)Future milestone; no work begunValidate readiness criteria

Step 3: Variance Analysis

For each milestone not on track (Amber or Red), conduct a structured analysis:

MilestonePlanned DateForecast DateVarianceRoot Cause CategoryRoot Cause DetailImpact on ProgramRecovery Actions
M-XXX+X daysSee below

Root Cause Categories:

  • Scope: requirements changed or were underestimated
  • Resource: staffing shortfall, skill gap, or competing priorities
  • Dependency: upstream deliverable delayed or blocked
  • Technical: unexpected complexity, defects, or integration issues
  • External: vendor delay, regulatory change, market shift
  • Process: approval bottleneck, decision delay, unclear RACI

Step 4: Trend Analysis

Track milestone health over time to identify patterns:

MILESTONE HEALTH TREND

| Period        | Green | Amber | Red | Complete | Total |
|--------------|-------|-------|-----|----------|-------|
| [Period - 2]  |       |       |     |          |       |
| [Period - 1]  |       |       |     |          |       |
| [Current]     |       |       |     |          |       |

Trend: [Improving / Stable / Deteriorating]
Pattern: [e.g., "Amber items converting to Red rather than Green"]

Step 5: Schedule Forecast

Project forward based on current performance:

MilestoneBaseline DateCurrent ForecastBest CaseWorst CaseConfidence
M-XXXHigh/Med/Low

Schedule Performance Index (SPI):

  • SPI = Earned Schedule / Actual Schedule
  • SPI > 1.0: ahead of schedule
  • SPI = 1.0: on schedule
  • SPI < 1.0: behind schedule
  • Current SPI: [calculated value]

Step 6: Recovery Planning

For Red and Amber milestones, define recovery options:

MilestoneRecovery OptionImpact on ScopeImpact on ResourcesImpact on QualityRecommendation
M-XXXFast-track (parallel tasks)None+2 FTE for 3 weeksIncreased risk
M-XXXCrash (add resources)None+$XX,000None
M-XXXDescopeReduced featuresNoneNone
M-XXXRebaselineNoneNoneNoneSponsor approval needed

Step 7: Milestone Review Summary

MILESTONE REVIEW — [Program Name] — [Date]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
[2-3 sentences: overall program health, key wins, primary concerns]

OVERALL RAG: [RED / AMBER / GREEN]

MILESTONES COMPLETED THIS PERIOD
- M-XXX: [Name] — Delivered [date] — [on time / X days early / X days late]

MILESTONES AT RISK
- M-XXX: [Name] — [Amber/Red] — Forecast: [date] — Variance: +X days
  Cause: [brief root cause]
  Recovery: [brief plan]

UPCOMING MILESTONES (next 30 days)
- M-XXX: [Name] — Due: [date] — Status: [RAG] — Readiness: [%]

KEY DECISIONS NEEDED
- [Decision required with context and deadline]

FORECAST CHANGES
- [Any rebaselined or rescheduled milestones with justification]

Output Format

  1. Executive Summary with overall RAG and key headlines
  2. Milestone Status Table (Step 2) with full RAG assessment
  3. Variance Analysis (Step 3) for off-track items
  4. Trend Analysis (Step 4) showing direction of program health
  5. Schedule Forecast (Step 5) with best/worst/likely projections
  6. Recovery Plans (Step 6) for Red and Amber milestones
  7. Decisions and Escalations requiring stakeholder action

Quality Checklist

  • Every milestone has a clear, measurable completion criteria (not just a date)
  • RAG status is applied consistently using the defined thresholds
  • Variance is calculated against the approved baseline, not the last forecast
  • Root causes are specific and actionable, not generic ("delays" is not a root cause)
  • Recovery plans include trade-off analysis (scope, cost, time, quality)
  • Forecast dates reflect realistic assessment, not aspirational targets
  • Completed milestones are formally accepted by the milestone owner
  • Trend data covers at least 3 reporting periods for pattern recognition
  • Downstream impact of slippage is traced through dependent milestones
  • All dates use consistent format (YYYY-MM-DD) and timezone assumptions are stated

Edge Cases

  • First milestone review (no history): establish the baseline, set RAG criteria with stakeholders, and note that trend data will be available from next period onward
  • Milestone with ambiguous completion criteria: pause and define "done" before assessing status; escalate if the team and stakeholders disagree on definition
  • Perpetual Amber milestones: flag items that have been Amber for 3+ periods without improving — they may need to be escalated to Red or rebaselined with sponsor approval
  • Scope change impacting milestones: rebaseline affected milestones through formal change control; track both original and revised baselines
  • External milestone outside program control: document the external dependency, establish a monitoring cadence, and define a contingency plan if the external date slips
  • Program with 50+ milestones: group by phase or workstream, provide a summary RAG per group, and deep-dive only into Amber/Red items and upcoming milestones
Skills enregistrées