brainstorming
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md
adversarial-review
adversarial-reviewFresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Documentation de la Skill
GitHubname: adversarial-review description: Fresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning. allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch, Agent, AskUserQuestion graph: domains: [domain:software-engineering] skillAreas: [skill-area:agentic-loops, skill-area:orchestration-loop] workflows: [workflow:feature-development] topics: [topic:developer-experience] roles: [role:tech-lead, role:backend-engineer]
- For final comprehensive cross-unit review
- When verifying spec compliance of any implementation
Key Differences from Collaborative Review
| Aspect | Collaborative | Adversarial |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Help improve code | Verify spec compliance |
| Verdict | Suggestions | Binary PASS/FAIL |
| Evidence | Optional | Required (file:line) |
| Reviewer | Can be reused | Must be fresh |
| Context | Shared | Independent |
Fresh Reviewer Rule
On re-review after FAIL, a NEW reviewer instance spawns with no memory of the previous review. This prevents anchoring bias where a reviewer fixates on previously identified issues.
Anti-Patterns
- Reusing reviewers after FAIL
- Passing previous findings to new reviewers
- Providing subjective or advisory feedback
- Accepting partial compliance as PASS
Tool Use
Invoke as part of: methodologies/metaswarm/metaswarm-execution-loop (Phase 3)