La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Desarrollo · SKILL.md

review-and-provider-backends

review-and-provider-backends

Configure and troubleshoot ARIS cross-model reviewers, MCP bridges, OpenAI-compatible providers, MiniMax, Claude/Gemini overlays, manual review, and optional Feishu/Lark integrations.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: review-and-provider-backends description: "Configure and troubleshoot ARIS cross-model reviewers, MCP bridges, OpenAI-compatible providers, MiniMax, Claude/Gemini overlays, manual review, and optional Feishu/Lark integrations." disable-model-invocation: true metadata: disco-role: operating license: MIT

Review and Provider Backends

Use this sub-skill when ARIS needs an external reviewer, MCP server registration, an alternative LLM endpoint, a manual human review handoff, a Claude/Gemini/Codex combination, MiniMax or ModelScope configuration, Feishu/Lark notification, or a Codex image bridge.

Route Here

  • Configure the default Claude executor + Codex MCP reviewer path.
  • Configure Codex executor + Claude/Gemini reviewer overlays.
  • Use a generic OpenAI-compatible llm-chat backend or MiniMax instead of Codex MCP.
  • Run manual review in browser or headless file mode.
  • Diagnose provider credentials, model names, retries, timeouts, MCP registration, protocol negotiation, and restart requirements.
  • Preserve cross-model independence and provenance evidence.

Reroute

  • Host skill directory, manifest, or selective install: ../install-and-distribution/SKILL.md.
  • Workflow selection and assurance levels: ../workflow-routing-and-skill-catalog/SKILL.md.
  • Research state, trace files, or watchdog: ../state-recovery-and-experiment-ops/SKILL.md.
  • Source edits or mocked server tests: ../repository-maintenance/SKILL.md.

Safe Backend Pattern

  1. Identify executor family and reviewer family.
  2. Pick one reviewer route and record its model, server name, endpoint, and credential source.
  3. Register MCP before invoking a workflow, then restart the host agent.
  4. Validate with a trivial tool call before spending a full review request.
  5. Keep raw review artifacts and traces; never let the executor summarize away a failure.
  6. If a provider is unavailable, switch to an explicitly configured alternative or mark the review blocked.

Reference Map

  • references/provider-matrix.md compares reviewer/provider routes, required environment variables, and independence implications.
  • references/mcp-servers.md summarizes the optional server contracts and testable failure modes.
  • references/troubleshooting.md covers keys, endpoints, protocol, model, timeout, and local handoff failures.
  • Root ../../references/repo-provenance.md and ../../references/troubleshooting.md provide provenance and cross-cutting diagnosis.

Avoid

  • Never publish API keys, bearer tokens, raw provider error bodies, or local debug paths in artifacts.
  • Do not call a same-family reviewer and label it independent.
  • Do not treat mocked MCP unit tests as proof of live provider connectivity.
  • Do not install every provider dependency when one selected reviewer path is enough.
Skills guardadas