La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Diseño y creatividad · SKILL.md

geological-modelling

geological-modelling

3D geological modelling workflow from spatial data preparation through implicit surface modelling and 3D visualization. Use when building geological models from surface data, boreholes, or GIS inputs.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: geological-modelling description: | 3D geological modelling workflow from spatial data preparation through implicit surface modelling and 3D visualization. Use when building geological models from surface data, boreholes, or GIS inputs. license: MIT metadata: skill_type: workflow version: 1.0.2 author: Geoscience Skills tags: '["Geological Modelling", "3D", "Implicit Surfaces", "GIS", "Workflow"]' dependencies: '["gemgis", "gempy==2026.0.3", "gempy-engine==2026.0.3.post1", "pyvista==0.49.0"]' complements: '["gemgis", "gempy", "loopstructural", "pyvista"]' workflow_role: modelling

Geological Modelling Workflow

End-to-end pipeline for building 3D geological models from spatial data, covering GIS data preparation, implicit surface modelling, and 3D visualization.

Skill Chain

gemgis              gempy / loopstructural       pyvista
[GIS Preprocessing] --> [Implicit Modelling]     --> [3D Visualization]
  |                      |                           |
  Shapefile parsing      Surface interpolation       Volume render
  Raster extraction      Fault modelling             Cross-sections
  Borehole to points     Unconformities              Mesh export
  CRS transforms         Scalar field solving        Interactive pick

Decision Points: GemPy vs LoopStructural

CriterionGemPyLoopStructural
Standard layer-cake geologyPreferredWorks
Complex folding (refolded folds)LimitedPreferred (structural frames)
Fault networksGoodGood
Built-in gravity forward modelYesNo
Learning curveGentlerSteeper
Data inputPoints + orientationsPoints + orientations + fold constraints
UnconformitiesERODE / ONLAP typesSupported
API styleFunctional (gp.compute_model)Object-oriented (model.update())

Rule of thumb: Use GemPy for standard structural geology with faults and unconformities. Use LoopStructural when fold geometry is the primary control on model architecture.

Step-by-Step Orchestration

Stage 1: Spatial Data Preparation (gemgis)

import gemgis as gg
import geopandas as gpd
import rasterio

# Load geological map (shapefile)
contacts = gpd.read_file('geological_contacts.shp')
orientations = gpd.read_file('orientations.shp')

# Extract surface points from GIS contacts with DEM
with rasterio.open('dem.tif') as dem:
    # All inputs must share the DEM's projected CRS and metre units.
    contacts = contacts.to_crs(dem.crs)
    orientations = orientations.to_crs(dem.crs)
    surface_points = gg.vector.extract_xyz(contacts, dem=dem)
    orientation_pts = gg.vector.extract_xyz(orientations, dem=dem)

# Define model extent from data bounds
extent = gg.utils.set_extent(
    gdf=surface_points,
    z_min=-500, z_max=1000
)

Stage 2a: Implicit Modelling with GemPy

The following synthetic inclined contact is a runnable GemPy 2026.0.3 example without input files or a GPU. Coordinates are local projected metres; Z is elevation, positive upward. Replace the arrays with Stage 1's validated contact coordinates and formation names for a real model. Orientations require pole-vector components G_x/G_y/G_z. Convert measured dip directions using the documented coordinate convention and polarity before building that table.

# example: gempy-model
import numpy as np
import gempy as gp
from gempy.core.data.options import InterpolationOptionsType

# Synthetic contact: z = -227.5 - 0.125 * (x - 1000).
extent = np.array([1000., 1200., 2000., 2120., -300., -180.])
resolution = np.array([8, 6, 5])  # Number of CELLS, not corner points.
surface_table = gp.data.SurfacePointsTable.from_arrays(
    x=np.array([1020., 1180., 1020.]),
    y=np.array([2020., 2020., 2100.]),
    z=np.array([-230., -250., -230.]),
    names='Sandstone_base',
)
pole = np.array([0.125, 0., 1.])
pole /= np.linalg.norm(pole)
orientation_table = gp.data.OrientationsTable.from_arrays(
    x=np.array([1060.]), y=np.array([2060.]), z=np.array([-235.]),
    G_x=pole[[0]], G_y=pole[[1]], G_z=pole[[2]],
    names=['Sandstone_base'], name_id_map=surface_table.name_id_map,
)
frame = gp.data.StructuralFrame.from_data_tables(surface_table, orientation_table)
geo_model = gp.create_geomodel(
    project_name='SyntheticInclinedContact',
    extent=extent, resolution=resolution, structural_frame=frame,
    intpolation_options_tye=InterpolationOptionsType.DENSE_GRID,
)
gp.map_stack_to_surfaces(geo_model, mapping_object={'Stratigraphy': ['Sandstone_base']})
geo_model.interpolation_options.evaluation_options.mesh_extraction = False
sol = gp.compute_model(
    geo_model,
    engine_config=gp.data.GemPyEngineConfig(backend=gp.data.AvailableBackends.numpy),
)

structural_frame supplies data at construction; gp.set_interpolator is not part of this API. The spelling intpolation_options_tye is the library's current keyword. For faulted input, map existing fault elements to their own groups with mapping_object, then call gp.set_is_fault and inspect the fault relations before computing. Do not invent fault surfaces without measurements. Optional GemPy-specific section plots use gempy_viewer.plot_2d.

Stage 2b: Implicit Modelling with LoopStructural (alternative)

This alternative requires its own prepared scalar-field and orientation constraints; it does not produce GemPy's sol. Its regular-grid ordering and stratigraphic column must be checked independently before exporting lithology.

from LoopStructural import GeologicalModel
import pandas as pd

# Prepare input DataFrames
data = pd.DataFrame({
    'X': x_coords, 'Y': y_coords, 'Z': z_coords,
    'feature_name': formation_names,
    'val': stratigraphic_values,     # Scalar values for interface position
    'gx': gradient_x, 'gy': gradient_y, 'gz': gradient_z  # Orientation
})

# Build model
model = GeologicalModel(
    origin=[extent[0], extent[2], extent[4]],
    maximum=[extent[1], extent[3], extent[5]]
)
model.data = data

# Add features
model.create_and_add_foliation('Stratigraphy', interpolatortype='FDI')
model.create_and_add_fault('MainFault', displacement=100)

# Update and access
model.update()
lithology = model.evaluate_model(model.regular_grid())

Stage 3: Export the GemPy Cell Model (pyvista)

Run this after Stage 2a. GemPy samples dense-grid cell centres with Z varying fastest (NumPy C order). VTK cell arrays use X fastest (Fortran order). Preserve both the axis ordering and physical extent when converting.

# example: gempy-export
import numpy as np
import pyvista as pv

regular = geo_model.grid.regular_grid
shape = np.asarray(regular.resolution, dtype=int)
bounds = np.asarray(regular.extent, dtype=float)
lith_block = np.asarray(sol.raw_arrays.lith_block)
if lith_block.size != np.prod(shape):
    raise ValueError('Export requires a complete dense-grid lithology block')
spacing = (bounds[1::2] - bounds[::2]) / shape
grid = pv.ImageData(
    dimensions=tuple(shape + 1), spacing=tuple(spacing), origin=tuple(bounds[::2]),
)
grid.cell_data['lithology'] = lith_block.reshape(tuple(shape), order='C').ravel(order='F')
grid.save('geological_model.vti')

Lithology IDs are categorical: use discrete colours and slices or extracted cells, rather than interpreting interpolated volume colours as rock mixtures.

import pyvista as pv

plotter = pv.Plotter()
sliced = grid.slice(normal='y', origin=grid.center)
plotter.add_mesh(sliced, scalars='lithology', cmap='tab10', categories=True)
plotter.add_mesh(grid.outline(), color='black')
plotter.show_axes()
plotter.show()

Common Pipelines

Standard 3D Geological Model

- [ ] Gather input data: geological map, DEM, borehole logs, structural measurements
- [ ] Load shapefiles and rasters with geopandas and rasterio
- [ ] Extract surface contact points with elevation using gemgis
- [ ] Extract orientation data (dip, azimuth) with gemgis
- [ ] Define model extent and resolution (cover data + buffer)
- [ ] Create GemPy GeoModel with extent and resolution
- [ ] Add surface points and orientations
- [ ] Define stratigraphic pile and structural relationships (ERODE, ONLAP)
- [ ] Add fault surfaces if present
- [ ] Configure interpolation options and compute model
- [ ] Validate with 2D cross-sections through known data points
- [ ] Visualize 3D result with pyvista
- [ ] Export to VTK or numpy for downstream use

Borehole-Based Model

- [ ] Load borehole data (collar, survey, lithology intervals)
- [ ] Convert lithology picks to surface contact points at formation boundaries
- [ ] Estimate orientations from multi-well dip calculation or assign regional dip
- [ ] Supply sufficient contact geometry and at least one orientation per structural group
- [ ] Validate: check model honours borehole intersections
- [ ] Iterate: add more data or adjust orientations to fix artifacts

GIS-to-Model Pipeline

- [ ] Load geological map polygons and structural measurements from shapefiles
- [ ] Reproject to common CRS with geopandas
- [ ] Extract formation boundary polylines from polygon contacts
- [ ] Sample points along polylines with gemgis
- [ ] Drape points onto DEM to get 3D coordinates
- [ ] Build GemPy model from extracted points and orientations
- [ ] Compare model surface traces with original geological map

When to Use

Use the geological modelling workflow when:

  • Building 3D geological models from surface mapping, boreholes, or GIS data
  • Converting GIS spatial data into implicit geological surfaces
  • Modelling faults, unconformities, or intrusions in 3D
  • Creating subsurface models for downstream geophysical or engineering use

Use individual domain skills when:

  • Only converting GIS data formats (use gemgis alone)
  • Only building a model with data already prepared (use gempy alone)
  • Only visualizing existing VTK meshes (use pyvista alone)

Common Issues

IssueSolution
Model artifacts at edgesExtend model extent 10-20% beyond data coverage
Insufficient contact geometryObtain additional constraints; label geological assumptions explicitly
Fault offset direction wrongReverse pole_vector or swap footwall/hangingwall points
CRS mismatch between datasetsReproject all data to common projected CRS with geopandas
LoopStructural fold not honouredAdd fold axis orientation and wavelength constraints
Resolution too coarseIncrease grid resolution but watch memory (50^3 = 125k cells)

API Sources and Verification

Skills guardadas