brainstorming
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
prepare-print-modelExport and optimize 3D models for FDM/SLA printing including STL/3MF export, mesh integrity verification, wall thickness checking, support generation, and slicing. Use when exporting from CAD or modeling software for 3D printing, verifying STL/3MF files are printable before slicing, troubleshooting models that fail to slice correctly, optimizing part orient…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Export and optimize 3D models for additive manufacturing. This skill covers the complete workflow from CAD/modeling software export through mesh repair, printability analysis, support generation, and slicer configuration. Ensures models are manifold, have adequate wall thickness, and are properly oriented for strength and print quality.
fdm, sla, sls)pla, petg, abs, standard-resin)cura, prusaslicer, orcaslicer, chitubox)Export the 3D model in a suitable format for printing:
For FDM/SLA: If starting from CAD (Fusion 360, SolidWorks) Export as: STL (binary) or 3MF Resolution: High (triangle count sufficient for detail) Units: mm (verify scale)
Example export settings: STL: Binary format, refinement 0.1mm 3MF: Include color/material data if using multi-material printer
预期结果: Model file exported with appropriate resolution (0.1mm chord tolerance for mechanical parts, 0.05mm for organic shapes).
失败处理: Check that model is fully defined (no construction geometry), no missing faces, all components visible.
Check that the mesh is manifold and printable:
# Install mesh repair tools if needed
# sudo apt install meshlab admesh
# Check STL file for errors
admesh --check model.stl
# Look for:
# - Non-manifold edges: 0 (every edge connects exactly 2 faces)
# - Holes: 0
# - Backwards/inverted normals: 0
# - Degenerate facets: 0
Common issues:
预期结果: Report shows 0 errors, or errors are repairable.
失败处理: Repair mesh automatically or manually:
# Automatic repair with admesh
admesh --write-binary-stl=model_fixed.stl \
--exact \
--nearby \
--remove-unconnected \
--fill-holes \
--normal-directions \
model.stl
# Or use meshlab GUI for manual inspection/repair
meshlab model.stl
# Filters → Cleaning and Repairing → Remove Duplicate Vertices
# Filters → Cleaning and Repairing → Remove Duplicate Faces
# Filters → Normals → Re-Orient all faces coherently
If automatic repair fails, return to source software and fix modeling errors (coincident vertices, open edges, overlapping bodies).
Verify minimum wall thickness for chosen process:
Minimum wall thickness by process:
| Process | Min Wall | Recommended Min | Structural Parts |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDM (0.4mm nozzle) | 0.8mm | 1.2mm | 2.4mm+ |
| FDM (0.6mm nozzle) | 1.2mm | 1.8mm | 3.6mm+ |
| SLA (standard) | 0.4mm | 0.8mm | 2.0mm+ |
| SLA (engineering) | 0.6mm | 1.2mm | 2.5mm+ |
| SLS (nylon) | 0.7mm | 1.0mm | 2.0mm+ |
Check wall thickness visually in slicer:
For precise measurement, use CAD software:
预期结果: All walls meet minimum thickness for chosen process. Thin walls flagged for review.
失败处理: Return to CAD and thicken walls, or:
Select orientation to optimize strength, surface finish, and support usage:
Orientation decision matrix:
For strength:
For surface finish:
For minimal supports:
Load direction analysis:
If part experiences:
- Tensile load along axis → print with layers perpendicular to axis
- Compressive load → layers can be parallel (less critical)
- Bending moment → layers perpendicular to neutral axis
- Shear → avoid layer interfaces parallel to shear direction
预期结果: Orientation chosen with explicit rationale for strength, finish, or support tradeoffs.
失败处理: If no orientation satisfies all requirements, prioritize in order: functional strength → dimensional accuracy → surface finish → support minimization.
Configure automatic or manual supports for overhangs:
Support angle thresholds:
Support types:
Tree supports (FDM, recommended):
Linear supports (FDM, traditional):
Heavy supports (SLA):
Interface layers:
In slicer (PrusaSlicer example): Print Settings → Support material
预期结果: Supports generated for all overhangs exceeding threshold angle, preview shows no floating geometry.
失败处理: If automatic supports inadequate:
Set process-appropriate parameters:
FDM layer heights:
SLA layer heights:
Key parameters by process:
FDM:
layer_height: 0.2mm
line_width: 0.4mm (= nozzle diameter)
perimeters: 3-4 (structural), 2 (cosmetic)
top_bottom_layers: 5 (0.2mm layers = 1mm solid)
infill_percentage: 20% (cosmetic), 40-60% (functional)
infill_pattern: gyroid (FDM), grid (basic)
print_speed: 50mm/s perimeter, 80mm/s infill
temperature: material-specific (see select-print-material skill)
SLA:
layer_height: 0.05mm
bottom_layers: 6-8 (strong bed adhesion)
exposure_time: material-specific (2-8s per layer)
bottom_exposure_time: 30-60s
lift_speed: 60-80mm/min
retract_speed: 150-180mm/min
预期结果: Profile configured with process-appropriate defaults, modified for specific material/model requirements.
失败处理: If unsure about parameters, start with slicer's default "Standard Quality" profile for chosen material, then iterate.
Inspect sliced G-code for issues:
In slicer:
Red flags in preview:
预期结果: Preview shows continuous perimeters, proper infill, clean travels, and no obvious defects.
失败处理: Adjust slicer settings and re-slice. Common fixes:
Save sliced G-code with descriptive name:
# Naming convention:
# <part_name>_<material>_<layer_height>_<profile>.gcode
# Example: bracket_petg_0.2mm_standard.gcode
# Verify G-code:
grep "^;PRINT_TIME:" model.gcode # Check estimated time
grep "^;Filament used:" model.gcode # Check material usage
head -n 50 model.gcode | grep "^M104\|^M140" # Verify temperatures
# Expected first layer temp:
# M140 S85 (bed temp for PETG)
# M104 S245 (hotend temp for PETG)
Pre-print checklist:
预期结果: G-code file saved with embedded metadata, temperatures verified, print time/material estimate reasonable.
失败处理: If print time excessive (>12 hours), consider: