La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Desarrollo · SKILL.md

resolve-git-conflicts

resolve-git-conflicts

Resolve merge and rebase conflicts with safe recovery strategies. Cover identifying conflict sources, reading conflict markers, choosing resolution strategies, continuing or aborting operations safely. Use when git merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop reports conflicts; when git pull results in conflicting changes; or when need to safely abort and resta…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: resolve-git-conflicts locale: caveman source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-04-26" description: > Resolve merge and rebase conflicts with safe recovery strategies. Cover identifying conflict sources, reading conflict markers, choosing resolution strategies, continuing or aborting operations safely. Use when git merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop reports conflicts; when git pull results in conflicting changes; or when need to safely abort and restart failed merge or rebase operation. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: git complexity: intermediate language: multi tags: git, merge-conflicts, rebase, conflict-resolution, version-control

Resolve Git Conflicts

Identify, resolve, recover from merge and rebase conflicts.

When Use

  • git merge or git rebase reports conflicts
  • git cherry-pick cannot apply cleanly
  • git pull results in conflicting changes
  • git stash pop conflicts with current working tree

Inputs

  • Required: Repository with active conflicts
  • Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
  • Optional: Context about which changes should take priority

Steps

Step 1: Identify Conflict Source

Determine what operation caused conflict:

# Check current status
git status

# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict

Status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation in progress.

Got: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates active operation.

If fail: git status shows clean tree but you expected conflicts? Operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.

Step 2: Read Conflict Markers

Open each conflicting file. Locate conflict markers:

<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
  • <<<<<<< HEAD to =======: Your current branch (or branch you are rebasing onto)
  • ======= to >>>>>>>: Incoming changes (branch being merged or commit being applied)

Got: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> markers.

If fail: No markers found but files show as conflicting? Conflict may be binary file or deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for full list.

Step 3: Choose Resolution Strategy

Manual merge (most common): Edit file to combine both changes logically. Then remove all conflict markers.

Accept ours (keep current branch version):

# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R

# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A

Accept theirs (keep incoming branch version):

# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R

# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A

Got: After resolution, file contains correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.

If fail: Chose wrong side? Re-read conflicting version from merge base. During merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates conflict markers so you can try again.

Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved

After editing each conflicting file:

# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R

# Check remaining conflicts
git status

Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".

Got: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.

If fail: git add fails or markers remain? Re-open file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> lines removed.

Step 5: Continue the Operation

Once all conflicts resolved:

For merge:

git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message

For rebase:

git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4

For cherry-pick:

git cherry-pick --continue

For stash pop:

# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"

Got: Operation completes. git status shows clean working tree (or moves to next commit during rebase).

If fail: Continue command fails? Check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continue.

Step 6: Abort if Needed

Resolution too complex or chose wrong approach? Abort safely:

# Abort merge
git merge --abort

# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort

# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort

Got: Repository returns to state before operation started. No data loss.

If fail: Abort fails (rare)? Check git reflog to find commit before operation. Then git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — discards uncommitted changes.

Step 7: Verify Resolution

After operation completes:

# Verify clean working tree
git status

# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1

# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)

Got: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.

If fail: Tests fail after resolution? Merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts resolved. Review diff careful and fix.

Checks

  • No conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) remain in any file
  • git status shows clean working tree
  • Merge/rebase history correct in git log
  • Tests pass after conflict resolution
  • No unintended changes introduced

Pitfalls

  • Blindly accept one side: --ours or --theirs discards other side entirely. Only use when certain one version completely correct.
  • Leave conflict markers in code: Always search entire file for remaining markers after editing. Partial resolution breaks the code.
  • Amend during rebase: During interactive rebase, do not --amend unless rebase step specifically calls for it. Use git rebase --continue instead.
  • Lose work on abort: git rebase --abort and git merge --abort discard all resolution work. Only abort if want to start over.
  • No test after resolution: Syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
  • Force-push after rebase: After rebasing shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing — it rewrites history.

See Also

  • commit-changes - committing after conflict resolution
  • manage-git-branches - branch workflows that lead to conflicts
  • configure-git-repository - repository setup and merge strategies
Skills guardadas