brainstorming
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
uk-vatUse when preparing or checking a UK VAT return — the nine boxes, choosing between standard accrual, cash accounting, flat rate and annual accounting schemes, Making Tax Digital digital-link requirements, what input VAT can and cannot be reclaimed, reverse charge, and correcting errors from an earlier period. Covers the VAT control account proof that must ho…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
For a VAT-registered small Ltd. Rates and thresholds are not repeated here — see
accounting-uk-ltd/references/rates-2026-27.md.
The scheme changes the arithmetic of every box. Assuming standard accrual when the company is on flat rate or cash accounting produces a wrong return that looks entirely normal.
| Scheme | Output VAT recognised | Input VAT reclaimed | Watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (accrual) | Invoice date / tax point | Invoice date | The default, not the certainty |
| Cash accounting | When customer pays | When you pay supplier | Debtors/creditors do not enter the return |
| Flat rate | Fixed % of VAT-inclusive turnover | Not reclaimable except capital assets over the set limit | The commonest source of badly wrong returns |
| Annual accounting | One return a year, interim payments on account | Cash-flow shape differs | |
| Margin / retail schemes | Special calculation | Second-hand goods, retail mixes |
Flat rate is the biggest trap. The percentage applies to gross turnover, input VAT is generally not recoverable, and a "limited cost business" test can force a higher percentage. A flat-rate return prepared as if it were standard is wrong in both directions at once.
| Box | Contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | VAT due on sales and other outputs |
| 2 | VAT due on acquisitions from EU member states (Northern Ireland protocol goods) |
| 3 | Total VAT due — box 1 + box 2 |
| 4 | VAT reclaimed on purchases and other inputs |
| 5 | Net VAT to pay or reclaim — the difference between 3 and 4 |
| 6 | Total value of sales excluding VAT |
| 7 | Total value of purchases excluding VAT |
| 8 | Total value of goods supplied to EU (NI protocol) |
| 9 | Total value of goods acquired from EU (NI protocol) |
Checks worth running every quarter:
The books must agree with the return. Prove it:
VAT control account balance at period end
= Box 5 net VAT due for the period
± amounts unpaid / unclaimed from prior periods
If the control account does not prove, the return is not ready. The difference is real — a
missing invoice, a mis-coded transaction, a duplicated entry — and submitting around it files a known
error. See bookkeeping-double-entry §3.
Getting this wrong is the most common assessment on a small-company inspection.
MTD applies to all VAT-registered businesses regardless of turnover.
This skill cannot submit a return. It prepares and proves the figures; the submission goes
through compatible software (see accounting-uk-ltd §1).
Do not silently adjust the current return without checking which route applies.
The record matters as much as the correction: an adjustment with no explanation is indistinguishable from a new error.
The commonest VAT error is not arithmetic, it is coding: the right amount recorded under the wrong treatment. It never fails a control-account proof, because the money still balances.
| Mis-code | Signature | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Standard-rated sale coded zero-rated or no-VAT | Box 1 ÷ box 6 well below the standard rate | Output VAT understated — the expensive direction |
| Zero-rated/exempt sale coded standard | Ratio above the standard rate | Output VAT overpaid |
| Purchase with no valid VAT invoice coded as reclaimable | Input VAT high relative to purchases | Over-claim, recoverable with penalties |
| Exempt purchase (many merchant fees, insurance, some finance) coded standard | Small persistent input-VAT excess | Over-claim |
| Gross posted as net | Difference divisible by 6 | Both boxes wrong |
| Reverse-charge item coded as a normal purchase | Boxes 1 and 4 both short by the same amount | Return understates both sides |
The ratio test is the cheapest detection there is. For a wholly standard-rated business, box 1 ÷ box 6 should sit near the standard rate. Materially off, and something is mis-coded — a two-second check that catches a whole class of error before submission.
Other quick sweeps: list transactions coded no-VAT above a threshold and confirm each is genuinely outside scope · check every supplier coded standard actually shows a VAT number and VAT amount · compare this quarter's VAT-code mix against last quarter's and explain any shift.
Merchant-service and payment-processor fees are frequently exempt, not standard-rated. Reclaiming VAT on an exempt fee is an over-claim that recurs every month until someone checks the invoice.
Correcting a mis-code follows §6 — the route depends on size and whether the period is filed.
A quarter with gaps still needs a return by the deadline. Prepare on what exists, and state the gap:
VAT RETURN (provisional) — Q ending 30 Jun 2026
proved: bank reconciled to zero; VAT control proves to box 5
gap: 3 purchase invoices missing (~£340 input VAT, per supplier statements)
effect: box 4 understated; box 5 overstated — the return errs in HMRC's favour
to resolve: copies from the supplier; correct on the next return if outside the window
Say which direction the error runs. An understatement of a reclaim is a different risk from an understatement of output VAT, and the user needs to know which one they are carrying.