---

name: scarcity-urgency description: Use when designing or auditing deadlines, limited seats, inventory messages, waitlists, expiring discounts, launch windows, limited editions, loss-framed copy, competition cues, checkout urgency, or scarcity claims that may create pressure to act quickly. license: MIT metadata: version: "0.1.0" displayName: Scarcity Urgency category: Marketing tags: influence,persuasion,scarcity,urgency

Scarcity Urgency

Use scarcity only when availability is genuinely constrained. Scarcity can help people prioritize, but fake or exaggerated scarcity suppresses deliberation and can become manipulative.

Quick Start

1. Read guidelines.md to choose the smallest useful reference set.
2. Load references/scarcity/knowledge.md for concepts and references/scarcity/rules.md for operating rules.
3. Use workflows/design-honest-urgency.md for repeatable tasks.
4. For audits, surface both the active influence cue and the ethical rewrite.

Contents

File	Purpose
references/scarcity/knowledge.md	Core concepts and source-grounded definitions
references/scarcity/rules.md	Rules, boundaries, and practical guidelines
references/scarcity/examples.md	Bad/better examples for applied situations
references/scarcity/smells.md	Red flags and anti-patterns to detect
references/scarcity/checklist.md	Fast review checklist
workflows/design-honest-urgency.md	Create urgency language that reflects real constraints and preserves thoughtful choice.

Operating Principles

• Use only honest evidence. Do not invent popularity, scarcity, credentials, endorsements, or social connection.
• Separate helping a good decision from pushing a shortcut response. If the cue is counterfeit, treat it as a red flag.
• When rewriting, preserve user agency: add context, alternatives, and enough time to decide when stakes are meaningful.

Output Pattern

1. Diagnosis - name the influence principle or cue.
2. Evidence Check - state what proof supports or is missing from the cue.
3. Risk - explain manipulation, trust, or decision-quality risk.
4. Rewrite or Recommendation - provide an ethical alternative.

Validation

Use the prompts in evals/evals.json as smoke tests. A good result identifies the relevant Influence principle, preserves user agency, and avoids fabricated evidence or coercive pressure.