executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
exec-narrative-patternsAudience-specific tone and format guidance for leadership communications. Use when drafting any /report:* output to tune length, framing, and technical depth to the reader (board, audit committee, CEO, weekly CISO, regulator).
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Different readers want different things. The same findings should not land the same way in a board deck, a CISO 1:1, and a regulator response.
| Audience | Length budget | Opening line wants | Technical depth | What they skip |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full board | 1 page max | Strategic posture one-liner | Low. No control IDs in body. | Operational detail, acronyms, tables with >5 rows |
| Audit committee | 2 pages | Risk-and-assurance posture | Medium. Control families OK, not IDs. | Strategy monologue, vendor names unless load-bearing |
| Risk committee | 2 pages | Residual risk movement | Medium-high. Framework names, risk scoring. | Program branding, tool selection detail |
| CEO weekly | Half page | What changed, what's blocking, what's asked | Low. Translate everything. | Framework politics, tool comparisons |
| CISO weekly | 1 page | What moved, what's blocked, what's next | High. Control IDs, tool names, owner names fine. | Over-explained context |
| Regulator / auditor | As long as needed | Precise scope + evidence | Maximum. IDs, artifact paths, timestamps. | Narrative softening |
Board and audit committee
CEO weekly
CISO weekly
Regulator / auditor
YYYY-MM-DD. Periods are YYYY-Q# or YYYY-W##.If you cannot defend every sentence as "the audience needed this to make a decision," cut it.
If the document opens with context before the point, invert it.
If there are three open items and no ask, you are reporting, not communicating. Add the ask.