La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Datos e investigación · SKILL.md

pre-trial-report

pre-trial-report

Drafts objective pre-trial reports for insurance carriers in personal injury defense litigation. Covers liability analysis, damages evaluation, venue/jury analysis, cost projections, expert testimony, settlement recommendations, and trial outcome predictions (~60 days before trial). Use when preparing carrier pre-trial reports, defense trial assessments, or…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: pre-trial-report language: en description: Drafts objective pre-trial reports for insurance carriers in personal injury defense litigation. Covers liability analysis, damages evaluation, venue/jury analysis, cost projections, expert testimony, settlement recommendations, and trial outcome predictions (~60 days before trial). Use when preparing carrier pre-trial reports, defense trial assessments, or settlement recommendation memos. tags:

  • drafting
  • litigation
  • memo

Insurance Defense Pre-Trial Report

Produces a structured, objective pre-trial report to an insurance carrier with honest risk assessment and actionable settlement/trial recommendations.

Required Inputs

  1. Case file — pleadings, discovery, depositions, prior status reports
  2. Trial date — confirmed date, judge, courtroom
  3. Medical records — treatment history, IME results, pre-existing conditions
  4. Expert reports — all retained experts (both sides)
  5. Billing records — fees/costs to date, projected trial costs
  6. Settlement history — demand/offer chronology, mediation results
  7. Surveillance/impeachment materials — if obtained

Header Block

PRE-TRIAL REPORT

TO:      [Claims Manager Name and Title]
         [Insurance Company]
FROM:    [Attorney Name], [Firm Name]
DATE:    [Current Date]
RE:      [Insured] v. [Plaintiff]
         [Court and Case Number]
         Policy No: [Number] | Claim No: [Number]
         Date of Loss: [Date] | Trial Date: [Date]

Report Sections

Draft each section. Be direct — acknowledge weaknesses, quantify risks, avoid over-promising.

#SectionKey Content
1IntroductionPurpose, timeline (~60 days out), developments since last report
2Trial LogisticsTrial date, duration estimate, judge, remaining deadlines
3Factual SummaryChronological, evidence-supported; flag disputed facts
4Venue & Jury AnalysisHistorical verdict data, jury demographics, comparable verdicts
5Judge & Opposing CounselJudge tendencies, ruling patterns; counsel trial record and style
6Costs & FeesIncurred to date; projected trial costs (attorney, experts, exhibits, post-trial)
7Motions PracticeCompleted motions and impact; pending (especially MSJ); planned MILs
8Liability AnalysisElements plaintiff must prove with evidence strength; comparative negligence %; affirmative defenses
9Damages AnalysisUse damages table below
10Expert TestimonyBoth sides — qualifications, expected testimony, credibility, impeachment
11Party PresentationPlaintiff credibility, deposition performance; defendant witness quality
12Surveillance & ImpeachmentFootage inconsistencies, social media, medical contradictions, witness conflicts
13Trial Outcome PredictionsDefense verdict % with reasoning; verdict range (low/mid/high) if plaintiff prevails
14Settlement RecommendationsCurrent posture, recommended range with reasoning, timing
15Final RecommendationsOverall assessment, cost-benefit, clear trial-vs-settle recommendation with timeline

Damages Table

CategoryAmount/RangeEvidence StrengthNotes
Past medical expenses$Gap treatment, causation
Future medical expenses$Expert support, speculative elements
Past lost wages$Documentation quality
Future earning capacity$Vocational expert opinions
Pain & suffering$Comparable awards in venue
Loss of enjoyment$Jury appeal factors
Pre-existing conditions—Apportionment arguments

Verdict Prediction Summary

Defense Verdict Likelihood:   ___%
If Plaintiff Prevails:
  Low:    $___   Mid:    $___   High:   $___
  Comparative Fault Offset:   ___%
Recommended Settlement Range: $___  –  $___

Critical Rules

  • Objectivity first — report may be discoverable in bad faith litigation; every statement must be accurate and defensible
  • Acknowledge weaknesses — carriers need honest risk information for business decisions
  • Don't force settlement — if the case is defensible, say so; if not, say that clearly
  • Consistency with prior reports — explain what changed and why if recommendation shifts
  • Quantify — percentages for liability outcomes, dollar ranges for verdicts, cost projections
  • Flag coverage issues — note anything creating coverage disputes or bad faith exposure
  • Jurisdictional specifics — comparative negligence thresholds, damage caps, forum-state rules

Checklist

  • Case identifiers (policy, claim, case numbers) included
  • Trial logistics and remaining deadlines covered
  • Factual summary is objective and evidence-supported
  • Venue/jury analysis with comparable verdict data
  • Judge and opposing counsel assessed
  • Complete cost analysis (incurred + projected)
  • Liability analysis covers each element and defense
  • Damages analyzed with ranges
  • Expert testimony assessed for both sides
  • Surveillance/impeachment evidence catalogued
  • Outcome predictions realistic with reasoning
  • Settlement recommendations specific with dollar ranges
  • Defense weaknesses acknowledged
  • Recommendations actionable with decision timeline
Skills guardadas