---

name: motion-in-limine language: en description: Drafts criminal defense motions in limine to exclude prejudicial, irrelevant, or inadmissible evidence before trial. Covers FRE 401-403 relevance/prejudice, FRE 404(b) character/prior-acts, FRE 801-807 hearsay, and FRE 702-703 expert testimony. Use when drafting pre-trial exclusion motions, evidentiary objection briefs, or motions to preclude testimony in criminal defense matters. tags:

• drafting
• litigation
• motion

---

Motion in Limine (Criminal Defense)

Drafts a pre-trial motion to exclude specific evidence, testimony, or exhibits from being presented to the jury. Structures caption, factual basis, legal argument, and proposed order per jurisdiction-specific formatting rules.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

• Case documents — indictment/complaint, discovery, deposition transcripts, exhibits at issue
• Target evidence — specific evidence, testimony, or exhibits to exclude
• Jurisdiction — federal (FRE) or state evidentiary code; local rules for MIL deadlines, page limits, formatting
• Prior rulings — earlier evidentiary rulings, stipulations, or discovery orders

Quick Start

1. Identify the evidence to exclude and the strongest exclusion ground
2. Draft caption with descriptive title: Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude [Specific Evidence]
3. Write a one-paragraph introduction (what, which rule, why)
4. Build factual basis citing the record
5. Argue each exclusion ground under a separate heading
6. Close with prayer for relief and proposed order

Output Structure

Caption & Title

Full court name, division, case number, parties per charging document. Descriptive title naming the specific evidence targeted.

Introduction (1 paragraph)

Element	Content
What to exclude	Specific evidence/testimony/exhibit
Legal ground	Primary evidentiary rule by number
Why	One-sentence prejudice/inadmissibility rationale

Statement of Facts

• Neutral recitation of facts relevant to admissibility only
• Cite record sources (pleadings, transcripts, exhibits) for every assertion
• Organize chronologically or topically for clarity
• Include procedural history only if relevant to the evidentiary question

Legal Argument

Argue each exclusion ground under a separate sub-heading. Always argue alternative grounds where available.

Ground	Rule	Key Elements
Irrelevance	FRE 401-402	Evidence does not make a consequential fact more/less probable
Unfair prejudice	FRE 403	Probative value substantially outweighed by prejudice, confusion, or misleading the jury
Character / prior acts	FRE 404(a)-(b)	Improper propensity use; address 404(b)(2) notice requirements and permissible purposes
Hearsay	FRE 801-807	Out-of-court statement offered for TOMA; no applicable exception
Expert testimony	FRE 702-703	Daubert/Frye reliability, qualification, fit

For each ground:

1. State legal standard with controlling case law
2. Apply facts to each element
3. Distinguish anticipated contrary authority
4. Rebut likely counterarguments

Conclusion

2-3 sentences synthesizing key arguments. No new facts or citations. Frame exclusion as the legally required outcome.

Prayer for Relief

Request: (1) grant the motion, (2) exclude the specified evidence, (3) order opposing counsel not to reference it absent leave of court. Include proposed order as separate document if local rules require.

Signature Block & Certificate of Service

Attorney name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email. Certificate of service with date, method, and all served parties. Comply with e-filing requirements.

Pitfalls & Checks

• Jurisdiction: Verify local MIL deadlines (often 7-14 days pre-trial), page limits, and oral argument availability
• State court: Substitute state evidentiary code equivalents for FRE rules; cite state case law — do not rely solely on federal authority
• Citations: Bluebook format — proper case names, reporter abbreviations, pinpoint cites, parentheticals
• Uncertain citations: Mark with [VERIFY] any citation not confirmed against the source record
• Record support: Every factual assertion cites the record; every legal proposition cites authority
• Tone: Direct and persuasive but professional; no ad hominem attacks
• Formatting: Comply with court-specific margins, font, line spacing, and ECF conventions

---

Key changes from the original:

• Added Quick Start — numbered workflow giving the drafter immediate orientation
• Trimmed description — consolidated FRE 404-406 into the more accurate "404(b) character/prior-acts" since 405-406 weren't substantively used
• Collapsed Prayer for Relief — replaced the verbose code-fenced WHEREFORE block with a concise inline summary of the three standard requests
• Collapsed Signature Block — compressed from bullet list to compact paragraph form
• Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls & Checks" — aligns with best-practice section naming and signals actionable verification steps
• Merged "Multiple grounds" guideline into the Legal Argument section where it's contextually relevant
• Reduced ~96 lines to ~80 lines while preserving all substantive legal content