executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
employment-arbitration-agreementDrafts enforceable mutual employment arbitration agreements under the FAA and state law. Covers claim scope, class/collective waivers, procedural fairness, cost allocation, PAGA carve-outs, and Armendariz compliance. Use when drafting new arbitration agreements, updating existing arbitration clauses, or adding ADR provisions to offer letters and employment …
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
name: employment-arbitration-agreement language: en description: Drafts enforceable mutual employment arbitration agreements under the FAA and state law. Covers claim scope, class/collective waivers, procedural fairness, cost allocation, PAGA carve-outs, and Armendariz compliance. Use when drafting new arbitration agreements, updating existing arbitration clauses, or adding ADR provisions to offer letters and employment contracts. tags:
Drafts a mutual arbitration agreement for employment relationships, balancing employer protections with procedural fairness to survive unconscionability challenges.
Collect before drafting:
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Parties | Full legal entity name + employee full legal name |
| Effective date | Specify; clarify current vs. prospective employment |
| Consideration | Prospective: employment itself. Current: independent consideration required (bonus, equity, continued employment per state law) |
| Mutual obligation | Both parties bound — required for enforceability |
Draft broad coverage with specific enumeration and "illustrative, not exhaustive" language:
| Exclusion | Reason |
|---|---|
| Workers' comp, UI | Statutory administrative schemes |
| ERISA benefits | Conflicts with statutory procedures |
| Trade secret/non-compete injunctions | Employer needs immediate judicial remedy |
| NLRB charges | Protected concerted activity |
| Agency charges (EEOC, state) | Filing right preserved; individual damages arbitrated |
| PAGA (CA) | Individual PAGA to arbitration; representative PAGA per Viking River Cruises v. Moriana / Adolph v. Uber [VERIFY current standing] |
| Auto-exemption savings clause | Any claim court determines non-arbitrable |
Administrator: [JAMS / AAA]
Rules: [JAMS Employment / AAA Employment Rules]
Arbitrator: Single neutral; retired judge or 10+ yr employment attorney
Location: Metro area where employee works/worked
Panel threshold: Three arbitrators if claim > $250,000 (optional)
Fallback: Administrator unavailable → mutual selection → court appointment
Discovery (critical for enforceability):
Arbitrator authority:
| Cost | Allocation |
|---|---|
| Employee filing fee | Capped at local court filing fee (~$200–$400); Company advances on hardship |
| Administrator/arbitrator fees | Company pays |
| Attorney's fees | Each bears own; statutory fee-shifting if employee prevails |
| Company prevailing | No fee recovery unless frivolous/bad faith |
| Transcript | Ordering party; Company if arbitrator requires |
| Savings clause | If unenforceable → reform to minimum; presume Company bears disputed costs |
Jury trial waiver:
Class/collective action waiver:
| Provision | Content |
|---|---|
| Governing law | FAA (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) for enforceability; state substantive law for underlying claims |
| Severability | Sever invalid provisions; reform to minimum enforceable extent |
| Integration | Entire agreement re: arbitration; supersedes prior terms; mutual written consent for modifications |
| Survival | Survives termination; binds successors, assigns, heirs; enforceable in bankruptcy |
Armendariz requirements (CA and following states) — all five required:
Key statutes and cases: