---

name: criminal-summary language: en description: Generates structured U.S. criminal case summaries from docket materials, filings, transcripts, and exhibits. Covers charge history, evidentiary posture, procedural timeline, plea/trial outcome, and sentencing. Use when asked to summarize a criminal matter, produce a case recap, compile a charge-to-sentencing timeline, or create a neutral case brief.

Criminal Case Summary

Produce a neutral, source-grounded summary from case initiation through final disposition. Every factual claim must cite a source document.

Prerequisites

Gather before starting:

• Identifiers: jurisdiction, court, case number, filing date, parties, counsel
• Charging documents: complaint, information, indictment, docket index
• Transcripts: arraignment, pretrial hearings, trial, sentencing (cite gaps if missing)
• Motions/rulings: suppression, discovery, continuance, evidentiary, plea, dismissal, restitution, guidelines, appeal-related orders
• Disposition records: verdict forms, judgment, sentence order, restitution order, sentencing transcript

Quick Start

1. Collect all available documents and note what is missing.
2. Build the summary sections in order (see below).
3. Populate the charge-evidence crosswalk and timeline tables.
4. Write a short narrative connecting key inflection points.
5. Cite every factual statement: [Doc/Exhibit], [page/section], [line or timestamp].
6. Run the QA checklist.

Summary Sections

Assemble in this order:

Section	Required Fields
Case Header	Court, jurisdiction, case ID, charged persons, counsel, procedural phase, status
Charges & Theory	Initial charges, statute, offense grade, enhancements, amendments, merged counts, dismissals
Evidence Matrix	Category, source, custodian, relevance per charge, offering party, admission/exclusion status
Motions & Rulings	Type, legal basis, filing date, ruling, appellate effect, unresolved follow-up
Timeline	Key procedural events by date and impact
Trial/Plea Track	Plea offers, admissions, factual basis, hearing outcome, witness sequence, jury instructions, objections, verdict
Disposition	Conviction/acquittal/dismissal, special findings, enhancements, custody status
Sentencing	Count-by-count sentence, concurrent/consecutive, custody credits, fines, restitution, supervision, ancillary orders
Post-Resolution	Pending motions, appeal posture, collateral consequences, compliance obligations

Charge-Evidence Crosswalk

Charge ID	Statute	Count	Status	Prosecution Evidence	Defense Evidence	Flags
C1			Filed / Amended / Dismissed / Convicted / Acquitted			Hearsay, tainted, excluded, contested

Timeline Table

Date	Event	Actor(s)	Ruling/Result	Case Impact

Narrative Block

After tables, write a brief narrative covering:

• What moved the case forward
• Major evidentiary inflection points
• Procedural departures (mistrials, continuances, substitutions)
• Disposition risks requiring follow-up

QA Checklist

End every summary with:

Source completeness:
- Reviewed: [documents/transcripts]
- Missing: [critical missing items]
- Conflicts: [inconsistent dates/rulings]
- Confidence: High / Medium / Low

Pitfalls

• No invented facts. Never fabricate conclusions, motives, or guilt findings.
• Neutral language only. Stay record-based; separate statutory basis from factual findings.
• Track status transitions explicitly: filed, denied, overruled, deferred, dismissed, amended, vacated, merged.
• Flag jurisdiction ambiguity. Label unclear sections Jurisdiction: verify; do not finalize interpretation.
• Mark inferences. Tag anything inferred from indirect indicators with [VERIFY] and identify the missing source.
• State-vs-federal awareness. Flag rule differences, sentencing regimes, and collateral consequences.

---

Key changes made:

• Frontmatter: Removed tags (not part of the spec), tightened description while keeping trigger guidance
• Structure: Reorganized into the recommended pattern — overview, quick start, core workflow, pitfalls
• Quick Start: Added a 6-step entry point so agents can orient immediately
• Reduced prose: Eliminated the numbered process steps that mixed instructions with templates; separated the tables into their own labeled sections for clarity
• Flattened the process: The original had 7 numbered steps mixing output structure with citation rules and QA — now each concern has its own section
• Pitfalls: Consolidated guidelines into a scannable checklist format
• Token savings: ~30% reduction while preserving all domain-specific legal content and table structures

If you grant write permission I can save this directly to the file.