La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Datos e investigación · SKILL.md

interspeech-writing-style

interspeech-writing-style

Use when writing or compressing an INTERSPEECH paper into its 4 content pages — the abstract-and-index-terms opening, task-first framing for a mixed science/engineering readership, table and figure economy, protocol one-liners that preserve rigor under compression, and the cuts that shrink pages without shrinking claims.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: interspeech-writing-style description: Use when writing or compressing an INTERSPEECH paper into its 4 content pages — the abstract-and-index-terms opening, task-first framing for a mixed science/engineering readership, table and figure economy, protocol one-liners that preserve rigor under compression, and the cuts that shrink pages without shrinking claims.

INTERSPEECH Writing Style

Four pages is not a short paper; it is a different literary form. The Interspeech house style evolved to let a reader — who may be a phonetician, an ASR engineer, or an area chair skimming forty PDFs — extract task, method, corpus, metric, and delta in one pass. Everything below serves that one-pass property.

The opening contract

  • Title: task and mechanism, in community vocabulary. Searchable in the ISCA Archive beats clever.
  • Abstract (~100–150 words): task → limitation of current practice → your move → corpus + metric + headline number → one-clause takeaway. Numbers belong in Interspeech abstracts; "significant improvements" without a number reads as evasion.
  • Index Terms: the paper kit's index-terms line is your search surface — pick the 3–5 terms your intended reviewers actually use.
  • Introduction (~0.75 column): no history of deep learning. Name the task in sentence one, the gap by sentence three, the contribution list by the end.

Density moves that buy space honestly

MoveBeforeAfter
Protocol one-linerA paragraph on data prep"We follow the ESPnet LibriSpeech recipe (commit X) except: …"
Diff-based method descriptionRe-derive the known architecture"As in Conformer [n], with two changes: …"
Table consolidationSeparate tables per test setOne table, sets as column groups, best in bold
Citation compressionThree sentences of related work per itemClause-level positioning: "unlike streaming approaches [4,5], we…"
Figure economyArchitecture diagram redrawing the standardOne figure that carries the finding (error breakdown, trade-off curve)

The related-work section can shrink to a paragraph if positioning is woven into the introduction — common and accepted at this venue (see interspeech-related-work).

Speech-community diction

  • Report metrics with their conditions attached: "WER 4.8% on test-other (no LM)", "EER 0.92% on Vox1-O", "MOS 4.1 ± 0.08". A bare number is a red flag.
  • Use canonical corpus/partition names; do not rename "dev-clean" to "validation".
  • Past tense for what you did, present for what the system does, no "novel" as a self-description — the reviewer decides novelty.
  • Acronyms: expand once, then commit. An Interspeech paper drowning in undefined acronyms fails the one-pass property for the scientist half of the audience.
  • Claims scale with evidence verbs: "improves" needs a CI; "suggests" tolerates a trend; "solves" needs more than four pages of anything.

The compression order (when you are at 5.5 pages)

  1. Cut motivation prose — Interspeech readers arrive pre-motivated.
  2. Convert method paragraphs to diffs against cited standards.
  3. Merge tables; move per-condition detail into a results sentence.
  4. Trim the intro's third rehearsal of the contribution.
  5. Only then consider dropping an experiment — and if the paper still does not fit, that is a Long Paper or journal signal, not a formatting problem.

Never buy space with template tricks; the PDF checker and the format police are real (see interspeech-submission).

Micro-example: results sentence, before → after

Before (3 lines):  We evaluate our proposed method on the LibriSpeech
dataset. Our method achieves significant improvements over the baseline.
Results are shown in Table 2, which demonstrates the effectiveness.

After (2 lines):  On LibriSpeech, the proposed front end reduces WER from
5.6% to 4.9% on test-other (Table 2; paired bootstrap p<0.01), with the
largest gains on utterances under 3 s.

The after-version is shorter and carries corpus, metric, delta, significance, and an analysis hook.

A working section budget for 4 pages

SectionBudgetJob
Abstract + index terms0.15 coltask→move→corpus→metric→delta
1. Introduction0.75 colgap, hypothesis, contribution — no history lesson
2. Relation to prior work0.3–0.5 colclause-level positioning (may merge into 1)
3. Method1.2 colthe diff against cited standards, one figure max
4. Experimental setup0.6 colcorpus, protocol one-liners, disclosure block
5. Results + analysis1.5 coldecisive table, ablation, one error-pattern finding
6. Conclusions0.2 colfinding restated, scoped future sentence

Budgets flex ±30% by paper type (science papers grow §4–5, systems papers §3), but a draft violating the total by a full column will not compress overnight.

Bilingual/global audience note

Interspeech's readership is the most linguistically diverse of the major ML-adjacent venues. Prefer plain constructions, keep sentences under ~25 words, and gloss language-specific phenomena (tone sandhi, pitch accent) in one clause — reviewers outside your language's community must still follow the claim.

Titles: a quick calibration

  • Weak: "A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Improved Speech Processing" — no task, no mechanism, unsearchable.
  • Serviceable: "Prosody-Gated Chunking for Streaming ASR on Spontaneous Speech" — task, mechanism, condition, all in Archive-searchable vocabulary.
  • Community pattern: many memorable Interspeech titles name the system once ("Conformer: …", "SpecAugment: …") and then say plainly what it does; earn the name after the colon with a descriptive clause, not instead of one.

Output format

[One-pass check] task/method/corpus/metric/delta extractable from p.1? y/n
[Opening] title, abstract-number, index-terms verdicts
[Density audit] paragraphs convertible to one-liners or diffs
[Diction] bare numbers, undefined acronyms, unverifiable verbs found
[Compression plan] ordered cuts to reach 4 pages without claim loss
[Escalation] fits in 4pp / needs Long Paper / needs journal

Format facts (4 content pages + references page; Long Paper track parameters) follow the 2026 cycle as logged in resources/official-source-map.md (2026-07-08); the paper kit of the current cycle is the sole format authority.

Skills guardadas