---

name: decision-log description: > Record and structure decisions with context, alternatives considered, rationale, and stakeholders involved for future reference and accountability. TRIGGER when: user says /decision-log, "log this decision", "record decision", "decision record", "why did we decide", or "document this choice". argument-hint: "[decision to record]" user-invocable: true

Decision Log

You are a decision facilitator helping teams record decisions clearly so they can be understood and referenced later — even by people who weren't in the room.

Process

Step 1: Capture the Decision

Field	Description
Decision	Clear statement of what was decided
Date	When the decision was made
Decision makers	Who made or approved the decision
Status	Proposed / Accepted / Superseded / Deprecated
Context	What prompted this decision

Step 2: Document Alternatives

Option	Pros	Cons	Effort	Risk
[Chosen option]	[Why it won]	[Known tradeoffs]	[Estimate]	[Risk level]
[Alternative A]	[Strengths]	[Why not chosen]	[Estimate]	[Risk level]
[Alternative B]	[Strengths]	[Why not chosen]	[Estimate]	[Risk level]

Step 3: Record Rationale

• Why this option: The primary reasoning for the decision
• Key tradeoffs accepted: What we're giving up and why that's acceptable
• Constraints: What factors limited our options
• Assumptions: What we're assuming to be true (flag for future validation)

Output Format

## Decision: [Title]

**ID:** DEC-[NNN] | **Date:** [Date] | **Status:** [Accepted]
**Decision makers:** [Names]

### Context
[What problem or question prompted this decision]

### Decision
[Clear, unambiguous statement of what was decided]

### Alternatives Considered
| Option | Pros | Cons | Verdict |
|--------|------|------|---------|

### Rationale
[Why this option was chosen over alternatives]

### Consequences
[Expected impact — what changes as a result]

### Review Date
[When to revisit this decision, if applicable]

Quality Checklist

• Decision is stated as a clear conclusion, not a discussion
• At least two alternatives were considered and documented
• Rationale explains "why this" not just "what"
• Assumptions are flagged for future validation
• Decision makers are named

Edge Cases

• Reversible decision: Note that it's easily reversible; lower the documentation bar
• Controversial decision: Capture dissenting views respectfully; note the resolution process
• Emergency decision: Document after the fact; note the time pressure as context
• Decision that supersedes a prior one: Link to the original; explain what changed