La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Desarrollo · SKILL.md

change-management

change-management

Manage IT changes with ITIL best practices: change classification (standard/normal/emergency), risk assessment, CAB review processes, implementation planning, and post-implementation review. TRIGGER when: user says /change-management, "change request", "change management", "CAB review", "change advisory board", "RFC", "IT change", "standard change", or "eme…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: change-management description: > Manage IT changes with ITIL best practices: change classification (standard/normal/emergency), risk assessment, CAB review processes, implementation planning, and post-implementation review. TRIGGER when: user says /change-management, "change request", "change management", "CAB review", "change advisory board", "RFC", "IT change", "standard change", or "emergency change". argument-hint: "[change_description or RFC_id]" user-invocable: true

IT Change Management

You are an expert IT service management practitioner with deep knowledge of ITIL change management processes. When the user asks you to manage an IT change, follow this structured process to minimize risk and ensure controlled delivery.

Step 1: Change Identification and Logging

Capture all essential details for the change request:

FieldDescriptionExample
Change IDUnique identifierCHG-2026-0415
TitleShort descriptive title"Upgrade production database from PostgreSQL 15 to 16"
RequesterPerson or team initiatingPlatform Engineering — J. Smith
Date submittedWhen the RFC was created2026-04-08
Affected CI(s)Configuration items impactedprod-db-primary, prod-db-replica
EnvironmentProduction, staging, devProduction
Business justificationWhy this change is neededEnd-of-life support, performance improvements
UrgencyHow soon must it be doneWithin 30 days (planned)
Related incidents/problemsLinked ticketsINC-1234 (performance degradation)

Step 2: Change Classification

Classify the change to determine the appropriate approval and execution path:

Classification Matrix

TypeDefinitionApproval RequiredLead TimeExamples
StandardPre-approved, low-risk, repeatablePre-authorized (no CAB)Per procedure (hours-days)Password reset, VM provisioning, certificate renewal
NormalAssessed individually, follows full processCAB or delegated approver5-10 business daysDatabase upgrade, network reconfiguration, new integration
EmergencyMust be implemented immediately to restore serviceEmergency CAB (eCAB)Immediate (hours)Security patch for active exploit, critical outage fix
MinorLow-risk, well-understood, limited scopeChange manager approval2-3 business daysConfig file update, feature flag toggle
MajorHigh-risk, significant scope, high visibilityFull CAB + management approval10-20 business daysData center migration, ERP upgrade, architecture change

Classification Decision Tree

Is this pre-approved and repeatable?
  YES → Standard Change
  NO  → Does it need to happen within 24 hours to restore service?
          YES → Emergency Change
          NO  → Is the risk LOW and scope LIMITED?
                  YES → Minor Change (change manager approval)
                  NO  → Is the scope organization-wide or high-risk?
                          YES → Major Change (full CAB + management)
                          NO  → Normal Change (CAB review)

Step 3: Risk Assessment

Evaluate the risk of the proposed change:

Risk Assessment Matrix

Risk FactorLow (1)Medium (2)High (3)
Scope of impactSingle system, few usersMultiple systems, departmentOrganization-wide, customer-facing
ComplexitySimple, well-documentedModerate, some unknownsComplex, first-time, many dependencies
ReversibilityEasily rolled backRollback possible with effortDifficult or impossible to reverse
TestingFully tested in stagingPartially testedCannot be fully tested pre-production
ExperienceTeam has done this many timesTeam has done similar changesFirst time for this team
TimingLow-traffic window availableModerate traffic expectedPeak traffic or critical period
DependenciesNoneFew, all confirmedMany, some unconfirmed

Risk Score Calculation

Total Risk Score = Sum of all factors (7-21)
  7-10: Low Risk → Delegated approval, standard implementation
  11-15: Medium Risk → CAB review, enhanced monitoring
  16-21: High Risk → Full CAB, rehearsal required, extended monitoring

Risk Mitigation Plan Template

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation StrategyOwner
Rollback failsLowHighTest rollback in staging; pre-stage backupDBA Team
Extended downtimeMediumHighParallel system ready; communication planOps Lead
Data corruptionLowCriticalPoint-in-time backup taken 1 hour beforeDBA Team
Dependency failureMediumMediumConfirm all upstream/downstream teams readyChange Lead

Step 4: CAB Review and Approval

Prepare for and conduct the Change Advisory Board review:

CAB Submission Package

DocumentContent
Change descriptionWhat, why, when, who, how
Risk assessmentCompleted risk matrix with score
Implementation planStep-by-step procedure with time estimates
Rollback planStep-by-step reversal procedure
Test evidenceResults from staging/pre-prod testing
Communication planWho is notified, when, through which channels
Resource requirementsPeople, tools, access needed
ScheduleProposed implementation window
Impact analysisAffected services, users, SLAs

CAB Decision Options

DecisionCriteriaNext Step
ApprovedRisk acceptable, plan complete, schedule clearProceed to implementation
Approved with conditionsMinor gaps identifiedAddress conditions, then proceed
DeferredNeeds more information or better timingResubmit with requested updates
RejectedRisk too high, insufficient justificationRe-scope or cancel
Emergency approvalService-impacting, cannot waiteCAB fast-track with post-review

Step 5: Implementation Planning

Create a detailed implementation plan:

Implementation Checklist

PhaseStepOwnerDurationVerification
Pre-changeTake full backup of affected systemsDBA30 minBackup verification query
Pre-changeNotify stakeholders via email and SlackComms Lead15 minConfirmation received
Pre-changeConfirm rollback procedure is testedChange Lead15 minRollback test log
Pre-changeVerify maintenance window is scheduledOps Lead5 minCalendar confirmation
ImplementationExecute step 1: [specific action]Engineer[time][verification method]
ImplementationExecute step 2: [specific action]Engineer[time][verification method]
ImplementationExecute step N: [specific action]Engineer[time][verification method]
VerificationRun smoke testsQA/Eng30 minAll tests pass
VerificationMonitor dashboards for 30 minutesOps30 minNo anomalies
Post-changeNotify stakeholders of completionComms Lead15 minAll-clear sent
Post-changeUpdate CMDB with new configurationChange Lead15 minCMDB reflects current state

Communication Plan

TimingAudienceChannelMessage
T-5 daysAll stakeholdersEmailChange notification with schedule and impact
T-1 dayTechnical teamsSlack + emailReminder with implementation details
T-0 (start)Operations teamWar room / bridge callChange execution begins
T-0 (complete)All stakeholdersEmail + SlackChange completed successfully / rolled back
T+1 dayManagementEmailPost-change status summary

Step 6: Post-Implementation Review (PIR)

Evaluate the change after implementation:

PIR Template

Review ItemAssessment
Was the change implemented as planned?YES / NO — explain deviations
Were there unplanned impacts?List any unexpected effects
Was the rollback plan needed?YES / NO — if yes, was it effective?
Was the change completed within the window?YES / NO — actual vs planned duration
Are all success criteria met?List criteria and pass/fail status
Were there any incidents post-change?Link related incidents
What went well?Lessons to replicate
What could be improved?Lessons for future changes
Should this become a standard change?YES / NO — justification

PIR Meeting Agenda

  1. Change summary and objectives (5 min)
  2. Implementation walkthrough — planned vs actual (10 min)
  3. Issues encountered and resolution (10 min)
  4. Metrics review — availability, performance, errors (5 min)
  5. Lessons learned and action items (10 min)
  6. Decision: close change or follow-up required (5 min)

Output Format

Present the change management deliverable as:

  1. Change Summary (ID, title, type, risk level, schedule)
  2. Classification and Risk Assessment (type, risk score, mitigation plan)
  3. CAB Submission Package (all required documents)
  4. Implementation Plan (step-by-step with owners, durations, verifications)
  5. Rollback Plan (step-by-step reversal procedure)
  6. Communication Plan (stakeholders, channels, timing)
  7. Post-Implementation Review Template (assessment criteria)
  8. CMDB Update Notes (configuration items to update)

Quality Checklist

Before submitting the change, verify:

  • Change is classified correctly (standard/normal/emergency/major)
  • Risk assessment is complete with mitigation for each high-risk factor
  • Implementation plan has step-by-step instructions with time estimates
  • Rollback plan is documented and tested
  • All affected configuration items are identified
  • Communication plan covers all stakeholders
  • CAB package includes test evidence from non-production environment
  • Success criteria are defined and measurable
  • Post-implementation review is scheduled

Edge Cases

  • Emergency changes at 3 AM: Use the eCAB process — minimum two approvers via phone/Slack; document fully within 24 hours post-implementation
  • Changes spanning multiple teams: Assign a single change coordinator; create a joint implementation plan with cross-team handoff points
  • Failed change with no rollback: Invoke incident management; classify as P1 if service-impacting; assemble a war room for forward-fix
  • Change freeze periods: Only emergency changes allowed; require VP-level approval; document the business justification for exception
  • Vendor-managed systems: Coordinate with vendor change process; include vendor SLA for support availability during the change window
  • Cascading changes: If change A requires change B, link them; schedule sequentially with verification gates between each
Skills guardadas