La interfaz está localizada; las descripciones y documentos de las Skills se traducen automáticamente con IA a su idioma. El código, los comandos, rutas y términos técnicos se mantienen en el original, y prevalece el documento del autor.
Explorar Skills
Datos e investigación · SKILL.md

expense-review

expense-review

Review and analyze expenses with categorization, trend analysis, anomaly detection, policy compliance checks, and cost reduction recommendations. TRIGGER when: user says /expense-review, "review expenses", "expense analysis", "spending review", "cost analysis", "expense audit".

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentación de la Skill

GitHub

name: expense-review description: > Review and analyze expenses with categorization, trend analysis, anomaly detection, policy compliance checks, and cost reduction recommendations. TRIGGER when: user says /expense-review, "review expenses", "expense analysis", "spending review", "cost analysis", "expense audit". argument-hint: "[department or cost center] [time period] [focus area]" user-invocable: true

Expense Review

Perform a structured review of organizational expenses to identify trends, anomalies, policy violations, and cost reduction opportunities. This skill produces an actionable expense analysis with clear findings and recommendations.


Step 1 — Scope the Review

Define what is being reviewed and why.

ParameterDescriptionExample
Review ScopeDepartment, cost center, project, or company-wideEngineering department
Time PeriodPeriod under reviewQ4 2025
Comparison PeriodBenchmark for trend analysisQ3 2025 and Q4 2024
Data SourceERP, expense management tool, GL exportNetSuite GL extract
Review TriggerRoutine, audit finding, budget overrun, ad hocQuarterly routine review
Materiality ThresholdMinimum amount for detailed line-item reviewTransactions > $1,000

Checklist

  • Data extract is complete and reconciles to GL totals
  • Chart of accounts / category mapping is current
  • Expense policy document is available for reference
  • Prior period data is available for comparison
  • Any known one-time items are pre-flagged

Step 2 — Categorize and Normalize Expenses

Ensure every transaction is properly classified before analysis.

Standard Category Taxonomy

L1 CategoryL2 Sub-CategoryGL Code RangePolicy Limit
PeopleSalaries & Wages6000–6099Per comp plan
PeopleBenefits6100–6199Per benefits plan
PeopleContractors & Temps6200–6299SOW-based
TechnologyCloud & Hosting6300–6349Budget-based
TechnologySoftware Licenses6350–6399Per-seat approval
TechnologyHardware & Equipment6400–6449$2,500/item limit
FacilitiesRent & Utilities6500–6549Lease terms
FacilitiesOffice Supplies6550–6599$500/month/dept
TravelAir & Ground Transport6600–6649Policy class limits
TravelLodging6650–6699$250/night cap
TravelMeals & Entertainment6700–6749$75/person/meal
MarketingAdvertising & Media6800–6849Campaign budget
MarketingEvents & Sponsorships6850–6899Pre-approved only
Professional SvcsLegal6900–6929Engagement letter
Professional SvcsAccounting & Audit6930–6959Contract terms
Professional SvcsConsulting6960–6999SOW required > $10K

Normalization Steps

  1. Reclassify any miscategorized transactions.
  2. Exclude inter-company transfers and reclass entries.
  3. Normalize for one-time or non-recurring items.
  4. Convert foreign currency transactions to reporting currency.
  5. Pro-rate partial-period items for like-for-like comparison.

Step 3 — Trend Analysis

Compare the review period against benchmarks to identify directional changes.

Period-over-Period Comparison

CategoryPrior PeriodCurrent Period$ Change% ChangeAnnualized Run Rate
People
Technology
Facilities
Travel
Marketing
Professional Svcs
Other
Total

Key Trend Metrics

  • Expense-to-Revenue Ratio: Total expenses / total revenue (target: depends on stage and industry).
  • Per-Capita Spending: Total non-people expenses / headcount.
  • Category Mix Shift: How the percentage allocation across categories has changed.
  • Growth Rate vs. Revenue Growth: Are expenses growing faster or slower than revenue?

Step 4 — Anomaly Detection

Flag transactions and patterns that deviate from norms.

Anomaly Detection Rules

RuleLogicSeverity
Single transaction spikeAny single transaction > 3x category monthly averageHigh
Category budget overrunCategory spend > 110% of budgetHigh
Duplicate paymentsSame vendor, same amount, within 7 daysHigh
Round-number transactionsExact round amounts ($5,000, $10,000) — possible estimateMedium
Weekend / holiday submissionsExpense submitted on non-business dayLow
Split transactionsMultiple transactions just below approval thresholdHigh
Vendor concentrationSingle vendor > 30% of category spendMedium
Rapid growth vendorVendor spend up > 50% period-over-periodMedium
Missing receiptsTransactions above receipt threshold lacking documentationHigh
Late submissionsExpense submitted > 60 days after incurrenceMedium

Anomaly Log Template

#DateVendorAmountCategoryAnomaly TypeSeverityResolution
1
2

Step 5 — Policy Compliance Check

Validate expenses against the organization's expense policy.

Compliance Checklist

Policy RuleCompliant?Exceptions FoundAction Required
All expenses have valid receipts
Travel booked through approved channel
Meals within per-diem limits
Hotel rates within policy cap
Manager approval obtained before spend
Vendor on approved vendor list
Contracts signed for engagements > $10K
No personal expenses reimbursed
Expense reports submitted within 30 days
Proper GL coding applied

Step 6 — Cost Reduction Opportunities

Identify actionable savings based on the review findings.

Opportunity Assessment Template

#OpportunityCategoryEst. Annual SavingsEffortTimelineOwner
1Renegotiate cloud hosting contractTechnology$45,000Medium60 days
2Consolidate software licensesTechnology$22,000Low30 days
3Enforce travel policy complianceTravel$18,000LowImmediate
4Eliminate unused SaaS subscriptionsTechnology$15,000Low30 days
5Shift consulting to internal capacityProf. Svcs$60,000High90 days

Prioritization Framework

  • Quick Wins: Low effort, immediate savings (< 30 days).
  • Medium-Term: Moderate effort, requires negotiation or process change (30–90 days).
  • Strategic: High effort, structural change needed (90+ days), but large impact.

Output Format

## Expense Review — [Scope] — [Period]

### 1. Executive Summary
- Total spend: $X (change vs. prior period)
- Key findings (3-5 bullets)
- Total identified savings opportunity: $X

### 2. Spend Overview
[Category breakdown table with trends]

### 3. Trend Analysis
[Period-over-period comparison; key ratios]

### 4. Anomalies & Exceptions
[Anomaly log with severity and resolution status]

### 5. Policy Compliance
[Compliance checklist with exception details]

### 6. Cost Reduction Recommendations
[Prioritized opportunity list with savings estimates]

### 7. Action Items
[Owner, deadline, expected outcome for each recommendation]

Quality Checklist

  • Data reconciles to GL totals within $1 tolerance
  • All categories are represented; no "uncategorized" bucket > 2%
  • Trend comparison uses like-for-like periods (normalized for one-time items)
  • Anomalies are documented with specific transaction detail
  • Policy compliance findings reference specific policy sections
  • Savings estimates are conservative and methodology is documented
  • Every finding has a clear owner and timeline for resolution

Edge Cases

ScenarioHandling Approach
Incomplete data (missing months)Flag data gaps; analyze available periods; note confidence limitation
Chart of accounts changed mid-periodMap old codes to new taxonomy; document mapping logic
Acquisition added new cost centersSeparate acquired entity expenses; analyze organic vs. inorganic trends
Currency volatility skewing comparisonsShow constant-currency comparison alongside reported figures
Shared services / cost allocationsReview allocation methodology; ensure drivers are current and fair
COVID or force-majeure period in baselineExclude distorted periods or use 2019 as normalized baseline
Skills guardadas