Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Dokumente · SKILL.md

component-spec

component-spec

Write a component spec for engineering handoff. Use when the user says "component spec", "design handoff", "spec this component", "document this component for engineering", "Figma handoff", "component documentation", "how do I hand this off", or needs to communicate a UI component design to developers - even if they don't explicitly say "component spec".

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: component-spec description: > Write a component spec for engineering handoff. Use when the user says "component spec", "design handoff", "spec this component", "document this component for engineering", "Figma handoff", "component documentation", "how do I hand this off", or needs to communicate a UI component design to developers

  • even if they don't explicitly say "component spec".

Overview

Based on "Atomic Design" by Brad Frost. Frost's atomic design methodology organizes UI into: atoms (basic elements), molecules (groups of atoms), organisms (groups of molecules), templates (page structures), and pages (specific instances). A component spec documents where a component sits in this hierarchy, what it's made of, how it behaves, and how it should be used.

The goal of a component spec is to make the engineering handoff self-contained. A developer should be able to build the component correctly without asking questions.

Workflow

Step 1: Classify the component (Atomic Design)

LevelWhat it isExamples
AtomSmallest UI unit, not decomposableButton, input, icon, label
Molecule2-3 atoms working togetherSearch field (input + button), form field (label + input + error)
OrganismComplex UI sectionNavigation bar, product card, comment thread
TemplatePage-level layoutDashboard layout, article layout

Knowing the level sets expectations for complexity and reusability.

Step 2: Write the component header

Component: [Name]
Atomic level: [Atom / Molecule / Organism]
Status: [Draft / In Review / Production]
Designer: [your name]
Figma link: [URL]

Step 3: Document variants and states

List every variant (different configurations of the same component) and every state:

Variants:

  • Size variants: small, medium, large
  • Style variants: primary, secondary, ghost, destructive
  • Content variants: with icon, without icon, with badge

States:

  • Default
  • Hover
  • Active/pressed
  • Focus (keyboard navigation)
  • Disabled
  • Loading
  • Error
  • Success

Provide a Figma frame for every variant x state combination.

Step 4: Document properties (props)

List every configurable property:

PropTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
labelstringYes-Button text
variantenumNoprimaryVisual style
sizeenumNomediumSize variant
disabledbooleanNofalseDisabled state
onClickfunctionYes-Click handler

Step 5: Document behavior

  • What happens on click / tap?
  • Are there animations or transitions? (duration, easing)
  • What are the keyboard interactions? (Enter, Space, Escape, Tab)
  • What happens at min/max content lengths?
  • What happens when text is truncated?

Step 6: Document accessibility requirements

  • ARIA role and attributes
  • Keyboard navigation behavior
  • Screen reader announcement
  • Focus management
  • Color contrast requirements (WCAG AA minimum)

Step 7: Document usage rules

When should this component be used? When should it not be used?

Use when: [specific contexts]
Don't use when: [anti-use-cases - what to use instead]

Anti-Patterns

1. Spec without states Bad: One static mockup handed off. Good: Every state documented - default, hover, focus, disabled, error, loading.

2. No accessibility section Bad: "Engineering will figure it out." Good: ARIA role, keyboard behavior, and contrast requirements specified by design, not guessed by engineering.

3. Props undocumented Bad: Figma file with no prop documentation. Good: Every configurable property listed with type, required status, and description.

4. Usage rules missing Bad: Component documented without guidance on when to use vs. not use it. Good: Explicit usage rules prevent misuse and inconsistency across [your product].

Quality Checklist

  • Atomic level classified (atom/molecule/organism)
  • Figma link to all variants and states
  • All variants documented
  • All states documented (default, hover, focus, disabled, error, loading)
  • Props table complete with types, required flag, defaults
  • Behavior documented (interactions, animations, edge cases)
  • Accessibility: ARIA, keyboard, contrast documented
  • Usage rules: when to use AND when not to use
Gespeicherte Skills