---

name: peer-review-feedback description: "Adversarial reading, soundness / novelty / clarity scoring, blameless feedback."

Peer review feedback

• Read once for claim, once for proof, once for prose.
• Score along three axes: soundness (is it correct?), novelty (does it add something?), clarity (can a non-author follow it?).
• For each issue, name the location (theorem N, line N), the problem, and a concrete suggested fix.
• Separate fatal (proof gap, false claim) from major (missing case, unclear statement) from minor (typo, notation).
• Tone is blameless and direct; assume the author is honest and tired.