Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Entwicklung · SKILL.md

flag-security-issues

flag-security-issues

Highlight security vulnerabilities in code changes

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: flag-security-issues description: "Highlight security vulnerabilities in code changes"

Flag Security Issues

Purpose

Highlight security vulnerabilities in code changes

This skill provides operational guidance for Flag Security Issues, including tool usage patterns, workflows, and quality expectations aligned with Syncolab skill standards.

When to Use

  • Use when the user needs help with Flag Security Issues.
  • When integrations for this domain are available and the task matches the workflows below.

When NOT to Use

  • When the task is unrelated to Flag Security Issues or covered by a more specific skill.
  • When required integrations or credentials are unavailable.

Expected Outcome

  • Correct use of domain tools with verified results (not fabricated).
  • Clear summary of actions taken, data returned, and recommended next steps.
  • Errors and missing permissions reported explicitly.

Inputs to Gather

  • User goal, constraints, and any identifiers (URLs, IDs, project keys).
  • Available tool sets and connection status.
  • Relevant context from related systems before destructive writes.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the request maps to Flag Security Issues and required tools are available.
  2. Gather identifiers and scope (project, channel, repo, date range, etc.).
  3. Follow the domain guidance below; prefer list/search before get/update when applicable.
  4. Execute tool calls using schemas from the integration; never invent tool output.
  5. Summarize results and offer logical follow-ups.

Tool Availability Rules

AccessBehavior
Full tool accessExecute workflows, verify outputs, report errors.
Read-onlyInspect and plan; provide exact commands or dispatch request for writes.
No integrationState limitation; do not fabricate API results.

Related tool sets

  • security-scanner
  • github

Review / Decision / Execution Criteria

  • Prefer smallest safe change; confirm destructive actions with the user.
  • Use evidence from tool responses; cite IDs and links when present.
  • Match integration-specific conventions (JQL, RFC3339, A1 notation, etc.).

Output Format

Report:

  1. What was requested and what was done.
  2. Key results (tables or bullets).
  3. Errors, blockers, or missing permissions.
  4. Suggested next steps.

Quality Bar

  • Specific, actionable, and grounded in tool output.
  • Concise unless the user asked for detail.
  • Respect rate limits, pagination, and API semantics.

Safety and Boundaries

  • Do not commit secrets, tokens, or PII into skills or user-visible logs.
  • Do not fabricate validation, send, or write confirmations.
  • Confirm destructive operations (delete, destroy, mass update) when appropriate.

Escalation / Dispatch Rules

  • If the task spans multiple domains, use or suggest related skills via relationships.skills.
  • If write access is required but unavailable, dispatch or ask the user to enable tools.

References

  • Legacy content migrated from skills/old_skills.json (flag-security-issues).
  • skills/skill.instruction.md, skills/meta.instructions.md
Gespeicherte Skills