executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
formulate-quantum-problemFormulate a quantum mechanics or quantum chemistry problem with proper mathematical framework including Hilbert space, operators, boundary conditions, and approximation method selection. Use when setting up a quantum mechanics problem for analytic or numerical solution, formulating a quantum chemistry calculation, translating a physical scenario into the Sc…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
譯物理系為善立量子力學問題:識自由度、構哈密頓與態空、定邊界條件、擇近似法、末以已知極限驗。
立方程前先全描之:
## System Characterization
- **Particles**: [list with quantum numbers]
- **Active degrees of freedom**: [coordinates, spins, fields]
- **Frozen degrees of freedom**: [and justification for freezing]
- **Symmetry group**: [continuous and discrete]
- **Energy scale hierarchy**: [e.g., electronic >> vibrational >> rotational]
得: 粒子、量子數、對稱之全清冊,活凍自由度之擇有能級理由。
敗則: 若能級不明,始保全自由度,標需作尺度分析。過早截斷致定性錯物理。
由第一步所識自由度建數學框架:
## Hamiltonian Structure
- **Hilbert space**: [definition and basis]
- **H = T + V decomposition**:
- T = [kinetic terms]
- V = [potential terms, grouped by type]
- **Constants of motion**: [operators commuting with H]
- **Symmetry-adapted basis**: [if block diagonalization is possible]
得: 完整厄米哈密頓,諸項皆顯,態空已定,運動常量已識。
敗則: 若哈密頓非顯厄米,察漏共軛項或規範依相。若態空模糊(如相對論粒子),明定形式並標問題。
約束問題以得唯一解:
## Boundary and Initial Conditions
- **Spatial domain**: [definition]
- **Boundary type**: [Dirichlet / Neumann / periodic / scattering]
- **Normalization**: [condition]
- **Particle statistics**: [bosonic / fermionic / distinguishable]
- **Initial state** (if time-dependent): [specification]
得: 邊界條件物理有據、與哈密頓域數學相容、足以定唯一解(或善散射矩陣)。
敗則: 若邊界條件過或欠定,察哈密頓於所擇域之自伴性。非自伴哈密頓須謹處缺陷指數。
依問題結構擇解策:
察精確可解:察問題是否降為已知精確可解模型(諧振、氫原子、伊辛模型等)。若然,以精確解為主果,微擾論作校正。
微擾論(弱耦合):
變分法(基態為重):
密度泛函論(多電子系):
數值精確法(小系、基準):
## Approximation Method Selection
- **Method chosen**: [name]
- **Justification**: [why this method fits the problem structure]
- **Expected accuracy**: [order of perturbation, variational bound quality, DFT functional accuracy]
- **Computational cost**: [scaling with system size]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why they were rejected]
得: 近似法擇有理由,明預期精度與算力,記所慮替代。
敗則: 若無單一法明宜,以二法立並比較。法間不合示問題難度,導後續精煉。
解之前驗立重現已知物理:
## Validation Checks
| Check | Expected Result | Status |
|-------|----------------|--------|
| Classical limit (hbar -> 0) | [classical Hamiltonian] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Non-interacting limit | [product states] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Symmetry transformation | [correct representation] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Dimensional analysis | [all terms in energy units] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Known exact case | [reproduced result] | [Pass/Fail] |
得: 諸驗皆過。立自洽待解。
敗則: 驗敗示哈密頓構造或邊界條件誤。溯誤至具體項或條件改之,方繼解。
derive-theoretical-result — 自立問題推解析結果survey-theoretical-literature — 尋類量子系之前人工作