Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Entwicklung · SKILL.md

context-window-management

context-window-management

Implements intelligent context window management with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: context-window-management compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

  • guidance
  • examples
  • do-dont description: Implements intelligent context window management with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: context-window-management, context window management, how do i context-window-management, orchestrate context-window-management, automate context-window-management, agent context-window-management archetypes:
    • orchestration
    • strategic anti_triggers:
    • brainstorming
    • vague ideation
    • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

Context Window Management

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for context window management workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
  • Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
  • Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
  • Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
  • Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
  • Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
  • Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

  • Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
  • High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
  • Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
  • Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

  1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

  2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

    • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
    • Historical success rate for similar tasks
    • Skill availability and health status
    • Required dependencies and their availability

    Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

  3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

  4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

  5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

    • Retry with adjusted parameters
    • Try alternative skill from related-skills
    • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

    Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def manage_context_window(
    messages: List[Dict],
    max_tokens: int,
    tokenizer: Any,
    strategy: str = "sliding_window"
) -> Dict:
    """Manage context window by enforcing token limits and applying retention strategies.
    
    Implements Law 2 (Parse at boundary) by validating token counts immediately.
    Implements Law 3 (Atomic Predictability) by returning a new context state.
    """
    if not messages:
        raise ValueError("Context window cannot be empty")
        
    # Calculate current token usage at boundary
    current_tokens = sum(len(tokenizer.encode(msg.get("content", ""))) for msg in messages)
    
    if current_tokens <= max_tokens:
        return {"status": "within_limits", "tokens_used": current_tokens, "messages": messages}
        
    # Apply retention strategy based on configuration
    if strategy == "sliding_window":
        # Keep recent messages, drop oldest until within budget
        retained = []
        tokens_in_retained = 0
        for msg in reversed(messages):
            msg_tokens = len(tokenizer.encode(msg.get("content", "")))
            if tokens_in_retained + msg_tokens <= max_tokens:
                retained.append(msg)
                tokens_in_retained += msg_tokens
            else:
                break
        return {
            "status": "truncated",
            "strategy": strategy,
            "tokens_used": tokens_in_retained,
            "messages": list(reversed(retained))
        }
    elif strategy == "summarize_oldest":
        # Trigger summarization for oldest messages
        oldest_chunk = messages[:len(messages)//2]
        # In production, this would call an LLM summarization skill
        summary = _generate_context_summary(oldest_chunk)
        return {
            "status": "summarized",
            "strategy": strategy,
            "tokens_used": len(tokenizer.encode(summary)) + sum(len(tokenizer.encode(m.get("content", ""))) for m in messages[len(messages)//2:]),
            "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": f"[Context Summary]\n{summary}"}] + messages[len(messages)//2:]
        }
    else:
        raise ValueError(f"Unsupported strategy: {strategy}")

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def handle_context_overflow(
    current_context: Dict,
    fallback_strategies: List[str],
    confidence_threshold: float = 0.8
) -> Dict:
    """Route context management when overflow occurs, applying fallback chains.
    
    Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast) by immediately halting on invalid overflow states.
    Implements adaptive routing based on historical success rates.
    """
    if not current_context.get("messages"):
        raise ValueError("Cannot route empty context")
        
    overflow_tokens = current_context.get("tokens_used", 0) - current_context.get("max_tokens", 4096)
    if overflow_tokens <= 0:
        return {"action": "none", "reason": "within_limits"}
        
    # Evaluate fallback strategies by historical success rate
    best_strategy = None
    best_confidence = 0.0
    
    for strategy in fallback_strategies:
        # Simulate confidence scoring based on past performance
        confidence = _get_strategy_confidence(strategy, overflow_tokens)
        if confidence > best_confidence and confidence >= confidence_threshold:
            best_confidence = confidence
            best_strategy = strategy
            
    if not best_strategy:
        # Fail loud - escalate to human or strict truncation
        return {
            "action": "escalate",
            "reason": "no_confident_fallback",
            "overflow_tokens": overflow_tokens,
            "fallback_tried": fallback_strategies
        }
        
    # Execute selected fallback strategy
    if best_strategy == "compress_metadata":
        return _apply_metadata_compression(current_context)
    elif best_strategy == "split_task":
        return _split_context_into_subtasks(current_context)
    else:
        return _apply_default_truncation(current_context)

MUST DO

  • Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
  • Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
  • Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
  • Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
  • Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

  • Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
  • Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
  • Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
  • Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
  • Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
  • Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

  • Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
  • Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
  • Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
  • Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
  • Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
  • Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
  • Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
  • Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

  1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
  2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
  3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
  4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
  5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
  6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios


Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
  • Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
  • Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
  • Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

  • Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
  • Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
  • Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
  • Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |

Gespeicherte Skills