Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Daten und Forschung · SKILL.md

founder-ideation

founder-ideation

Use when the user asks to generate business ideas, evaluate an existing idea adversarially, find underserved niches, or check what's heating up in an industry. Phase 1 flagship subskill of the founder family. Runs adversarial team brainstorm (4 parallel founding lenses with cross-fire) grounded in real Reddit pain data and GDELT inflection data. Modes: gene…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: founder-ideation description: > Use when the user asks to generate business ideas, evaluate an existing idea adversarially, find underserved niches, or check what's heating up in an industry. Phase 1 flagship subskill of the founder family. Runs adversarial team brainstorm (4 parallel founding lenses with cross-fire) grounded in real Reddit pain data and GDELT inflection data. Modes: generate_ideas, evaluate_idea, find_niches, heat_check. Optional deep_tech_mode flag for inventor / hardware / patent work. Routes via parent founder skill. Trigger on: "generate N ideas", "business ideas generator", "what should I build", "attack my idea", "underserved niches in X", "what's hot in Y industry".

Founder Ideation (Phase 1 Flagship)

Child of founder. This skill is the flagship of the founder family — the most differentiated subskill. It generates (or attacks) business ideas via adversarial team brainstorm grounded in real Reddit pain data and GDELT event velocity data.

Scope: Pre-execution ideation. Produces ideas with kill criteria, first experiments, data citations, and cross-fire attack histories. Writes results to .founder/venture-brief.yaml.

Siblings (parent = founder):

  • founder-validation — Phase 2 — Mom Test, assumption ledger, experiment sequencing
  • founder-business-model — Phase 2 — unit economics calculator mode
  • founder-gtm — Phase 2 — positioning, distribution, channel selection
  • founder-sprint — Phase 2 — stage machine coordinating all of the above, forge handoff


Modes

1. generate_ideas

"Give me N business ideas for niche X" — the primary mode.

Input:

mode: "generate_ideas"
niche: string                     # from venture-brief intake, or user override
n_ideas: int                      # default 10, max 30
biz_type: enum                    # from venture-brief (software | service | marketplace | ...)
user_assets: map                  # from venture-brief (skills, networks, distribution, unique_access)
deep_tech_mode: bool              # default false
team_model_overrides: map         # optional; default {contrarian: codex}

Flow:

  1. Read venture-brief.yaml — load intake, existing ideas, user assets. Refuse if missing.
  2. Parallel data gathering (before team spawn):
    • Invoke reddit-signal-mining with operation: mine_pains + niche → pain records
    • Invoke gdelt-event-mining with operation: inflection_scan + theme-map(niche) → inflection records
    • Both run in parallel, time-bounded (default 90s total)
  3. Run adversarial-team-brainstorm with:
    • question: "Generate {n_ideas + 4} {biz_type} ideas for {niche}" (extra budget for arbiter trim)
    • team_angles: ["problem-first", "asset-first", "trend-first", "contrarian"]
    • rounds: 4
    • n_per_team: ceil((n_ideas + 4) / 4)
    • context:
      • reddit_pain_data: mined pain records
      • gdelt_inflection_data: inflection records
      • user_assets: from venture-brief
    • kill_criteria_required: true
    • team_model_override: {contrarian: codex} (default) unless caller overrides
    • output_class: "ideas" (enforces HR-4 + HR-5 in arbiter)
  4. Arbiter returns ranked outputs with kill criteria, first experiments, attack histories
  5. Trim to n_ideas (arbiter already ranked; take top-N)
  6. Write to venture-brief.yaml.ideas_considered[] — each idea as a new record with status: candidate, full attack history, refinement history, data sources
  7. Return structured output for display to user

Output (to user):

mode: generate_ideas
ideas:
  - rank: 1
    content: string
    source_team: string
    confidence: enum
    kill_criteria: list[string]
    first_experiment: string
    data_sources: list[string]
    attack_history: list[...]
    revisions:
      before: string
      after: string
      critique_absorbed: list[string]
arbiter_notes: string           # synthesis patterns, minority reports, confidence distribution
data_grounding:
  reddit:
    subreddits_queried: list[string]
    pains_extracted: int
  gdelt:
    themes_queried: list[string]
    inflections_detected: int
venture_brief_path: string

2. evaluate_idea

"I have this idea. Attack it."

Input:

mode: "evaluate_idea"
idea: string                      # the user's proposed idea
biz_type: enum                    # from intake
niche: string                     # from intake
user_assets: map
deep_tech_mode: bool

Flow:

  1. Read venture-brief. Refuse on missing intake.
  2. Parallel data gathering (same as generate_ideas)
  3. Run adversarial-team-brainstorm with:
    • question: "Attack this idea: {idea}. Find flaws, kill criteria, first experiments, hybrid variants."
    • team_angles: ["contrarian", "first-principles", "arbitrage", "constraint-inverted"] (different angles for attack-mode)
    • rounds: 4 (same structure — teams first propose attacks, then cross-fire each other's attacks, then refine, then arbiter)
    • n_per_team: 3 (fewer outputs per team, but deeper attacks)
    • context:
      • user_idea: idea
      • reddit_pain_data: mined pain records
      • gdelt_inflection_data: inflection records
      • user_assets
    • kill_criteria_required: true
    • output_class: "ideas" (HR-4 + HR-5 still apply — attack outputs must cite data)
  4. Arbiter produces a single structured attack report:
    • Surviving-or-not verdict for the original idea
    • Top 3-5 most severe attacks
    • Suggested pivots (if any) — hybrid ideas that absorb the attacks
    • Suggested first experiment to validate the core claim
  5. Write to venture-brief.yaml.ideas_considered[] with the original idea + refined pivots as separate entries

Output:

mode: evaluate_idea
verdict: enum                     # "survives_with_pivot" | "survives_as_is" | "killed" | "needs_data"
original_idea:
  content: string
  status: enum                    # candidate | validated | killed
  attack_history: list[...]
  unabsorbed_critical_attacks: list[...]  # if any — these are the deal-breakers
pivots:
  - content: string               # pivot that absorbs the attacks
    delta_from_original: string   # what changed
    kill_criteria: list[string]
    first_experiment: string
    data_sources: list[string]
recommended_next: string          # "run the first experiment", "validate with N users", "pivot to X"

3. find_niches

"What underserved niches exist in [broader space X]?"

Input:

mode: "find_niches"
broader_space: string             # e.g. "B2B fintech", "home construction", "elderly care"
biz_type: enum
user_assets: map
n_niches: int                     # default 5

Flow:

  1. Read venture-brief
  2. Heavy data gathering:
    • reddit-signal-mining with discover_subs to find all sub-communities in the broader space
    • reddit-signal-mining with mine_pains across discovered subs
    • gdelt-event-mining with events_by_theme + inflection_scan for the broader space
  3. Run adversarial-team-brainstorm with:
    • question: "Identify {n_niches + 3} underserved niches within {broader_space}"
    • team_angles: ["problem-first", "trend-first", "contrarian", "constraint-inverted"] (no asset-first — niche discovery isn't about leveraging user assets yet)
    • rounds: 4
    • n_per_team: ceil((n_niches + 3) / 4)
    • output_class: "ideas" (niches are structured with kill criteria — HR-4 still applies)
  4. Arbiter returns ranked niches with:
    • Why each niche is underserved (evidence from Reddit + GDELT)
    • Who the customer is
    • Why incumbents aren't serving them
    • What would kill the niche (consolidation, regulation, etc.)
  5. Write to venture-brief; don't generate ideas yet — that's a follow-up generate_ideas call

Output: ranked niches with provenance + kill criteria + "why underserved" rationale.

4. heat_check

"What's getting hot in [industry Y] right now?"

Input:

mode: "heat_check"
industry: string
lookback_days: int                # default 7
baseline_days: int                # default 30

Flow:

  1. Read venture-brief (minimal — heat_check is read-only for venture state)
  2. Data mining ONLY:
    • reddit-signal-mining with heat_scan on industry subreddits
    • gdelt-event-mining with inflection_scan on industry themes
  3. NO adversarial brainstorm. Heat check is pure data mining with LLM hypothesis attachment.
  4. For each HOT / FIRE signal, invoke a single LLM pass to generate a 1-sentence hypothesis (prefixed hypothesis: so callers know it's interpretive).
  5. Return structured heat report. Do NOT write to ideas_considered[] — heat check produces signals, not ideas. Signals don't need kill criteria or first experiments.

Output:

mode: heat_check
reddit_heat:
  - subreddit: string
    tier: enum                    # WARM | HOT | FIRE
    ratio: float
    top_trending_posts: list[...]
    hypothesis: string            # "hypothesis: ..."
gdelt_heat:
  - theme: string
    tier: enum
    ratio: float
    top_events: list[...]
    hypothesis: string
caveat: >
  Heat check signals are hypotheses attached to raw data, not ideas.
  They are NOT validated, not kill-criteria-attached, and NOT first-experiment-ready.
  To turn a hot signal into an investable idea, run `generate_ideas` with the hot
  niche as input.

5. deep_tech_mode (flag, not a standalone mode)

Overlays all four modes with inventor-specific frameworks. Activated via deep_tech_mode: true.

When active:

  • Team outputs must additionally include:
    • IP landscape — existing patents / prior art / freedom-to-operate questions
    • Regulatory triggers — which regulators will care (FDA, FCC, CE, UKCA, ISO, etc.)
    • DFM (Design for Manufacturability) — what makes this manufacturable at scale
    • TRL / SRL / BRL assessment — Technology / System / Business Readiness Levels (0-9 scale)
  • The first-principles angle is added to the default team_angles list (replacing one of the weaker angles for deep-tech)
  • The heat_check mode additionally queries GDELT for TECH_* themes tied to the invention category
  • The arbiter adds a deep_tech_concerns section to its notes

See references/deep-tech-mode.md for the full overlay specification.


Reference Files

  • references/team-lenses.md — detailed specs for problem-first / asset-first / trend-first / contrarian, how to feed data into each, expected output shape per lens
  • references/data-integration.md — how to call reddit-signal-mining and gdelt-event-mining from within this skill, how to pass data to team spawns, what to do on data gathering failure
  • references/deep-tech-mode.md — TRL/SRL/BRL overlay, IP landscape questions, regulatory trigger list, DFM considerations
  • references/business-idea-prompts.md — prompt templates per biz_type (software / service / marketplace / hardware / deep-tech / physical-retail / other)
  • references/kill-criteria-library.md — standard kill criteria library: distribution gap, unit econ negative, regulatory block, saturated market, no switching cost, no compounding moat, etc. Arbiter falls back to these when teams don't produce sharper ones.

Data Integration Pattern

The skill is the OWNER of the call to data-mining skills. See references/data-integration.md for the full contract. Summary:

  1. Determine which subreddits to mine — either from user input, from venture-brief, or via reddit-signal-mining:discover_subs with the niche
  2. Determine which GDELT themes to query — via the theme-taxonomy.md industry-mapping table (reddit-signal-mining doesn't provide these — founder-ideation's own knowledge)
  3. Invoke both in parallel:
    • Spawn a subagent for reddit-signal-mining operation
    • Spawn a subagent for gdelt-event-mining operation
    • Time-bound: 90 seconds wall clock, return partial results on timeout
  4. If both fail:
    • For generate_ideas / evaluate_idea / find_niches: DEGRADE. Run adversarial brainstorm with context: {}. Arbiter will cap confidence at speculative. Mark the output with data_source: "ungrounded_degraded".
    • For heat_check: HALT. Heat check without data is meaningless.
  5. If one fails and one succeeds: continue with the partial grounding and note the gap.

Cross-Skill Invocation Flow (Phase 1)

founder (parent)
  │ intake populated → route to founder-ideation
  ▼
founder-ideation (this skill)
  │ read venture-brief
  │
  ├──parallel──▶ reddit-signal-mining (mine_pains or heat_scan)
  │              │
  │              ▶ returns pain records or heat tier
  │
  └──parallel──▶ gdelt-event-mining (inflection_scan or events_by_theme)
                 │
                 ▶ returns inflection records or events
  │
  ▼
adversarial-team-brainstorm
  ├──Round 1──▶ 4 parallel teams (each gets its own slice of data)
  ├──Round 2──▶ cross-fire (each team attacks 3 other teams)
  ├──Round 3──▶ refine (each team absorbs / rejects attacks)
  └──Round 4──▶ arbiter (synthesize, rank, kill-criteria, confidence)
  │
  ▼
founder-ideation (this skill)
  │ write to venture-brief.ideas_considered[]
  │ return structured output
  ▼
founder (parent)
  │ display to user

Failure Modes

FailureDetectionResponse
No venture-brief / missing intakeParent should have caught; if not, halt and return errorReturn to parent with "intake missing: biz_type/geography/niche"; parent asks the user
Reddit data mining fails entirelyreddit-signal-mining returns empty + gap listContinue with GDELT only; mark reddit: "unavailable"; arbiter caps grounded confidence
GDELT data mining fails entirelySame for GDELTContinue with Reddit only; same cap
Both data sources failDetected in parallel fetchFor modes needing grounding: degrade to ungrounded, cap all confidence at speculative, warn user; for heat_check: halt
Adversarial brainstorm Round 2 (cross-fire) failsNo attacks from 2+ teamsRerun Round 2 once; if still fails, halt and mark FAILED per HR (refuse to output ranked list without cross-fire)
Contrarian team produces pseudo-contrarian outputArbiter validator flags itReject, re-spawn contrarian with sharper prompt; max 1 retry
Arbiter cannot produce 2+ kill criteria per outputArbiter validator failsDrop the output from the final list (HR-4 enforcement)
Venture-brief write fails (disk full, perms)IO errorReturn the output to the user anyway, but mark venture_brief_updated: false and warn
deep_tech_mode outputs missing IP / reg / DFM answersValidator failsRe-spawn the team with stricter prompt; max 1 retry; drop output if still missing

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Running generate_ideas without first mining Reddit/GDELT dataTeams produce LLM-vs-LLM consensus with no grounding; HR-5 violatedAlways mine data first, pass to teams via context, fail gracefully if data unavailable
Using the same 4 angles for every modeDifferent modes need different lenses (attack modes should skew contrarian + first-principles)generate_ideas uses problem/asset/trend/contrarian; evaluate_idea uses contrarian/first-principles/arbitrage/constraint-inverted
Ignoring the contrarian team because it produces harsh outputHarsh output IS the point; harshness is the anti-groupthink mechanismPreserve contrarian outputs in the ranked list even if they contradict the other teams
Hiding kill criteria in appendices to make ideas look more compellingDefeats HR-4; user makes decisions with false confidenceKill criteria are first-class output, alongside the idea content, not footnoted
Returning raw Reddit quotes with identifying details to illustrate painViolates HR-11; privacy breachreddit-signal-mining paraphrases by default; re-enforce at output formatting
Running heat_check and treating signals as investable ideasSignals are hypotheses, not validated ideas; no kill criteria attachedHeat check output explicitly says "to turn signals into ideas, run generate_ideas"; user must take the next step
Skipping deep_tech_mode overlay for hardware / invention requestsLoses critical IP / regulatory / DFM grounding; produces software-shaped advice for non-software problemsParent intake detects deep-tech intent and passes deep_tech_mode: true; check venture-brief on entry
Running with n_ideas > 30Team output quality degrades dramatically above ~30; cross-fire becomes noiseCap at 30; tell the user to run multiple rounds if they need more

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • User wants to validate an idea with real users (not just attack it with LLMs) — Phase 2 founder-validation will do that. For Phase 1, evaluate_idea is the closest substitute.
  • User wants business model / unit economics work — Phase 2 founder-business-model; for Phase 1, explain that it's coming and offer to help prepare the inputs.
  • User wants to write a pitch deck — Phase 1 has presentation-builder + yc-pitch / sequoia-pitch flow stubs (WP-F8); route there via parent
  • User wants to start building — hand off to forge via the Scope→Launch gate (parent handles the routing)
  • Pure market research without ideation intent — use reddit-signal-mining + gdelt-event-mining directly; this skill's overhead (adversarial brainstorm) is wasted
  • Legal / tax / valuation / fundraising questions — REFUSED by parent (HR-1, HR-2, HR-3)
Gespeicherte Skills