Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Produktivität · SKILL.md

cyber-scoped-validation

cyber-scoped-validation

Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: cyber-scoped-validation guardrail: true description: Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates. metadata: labels: [cybersecurity, scoped-validation, red-team] triggers: keywords: [scoped validation, validate exercise result, authorized validation, scope check, runtime support check, validation evidence]

Cyber Scoped Validation

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

Validate one approved claim at a time; unsupported live controls produce a block, not a workaround.

Structure

cyber-scoped-validation/
├── SKILL.md
├── references/validation-record.md
└── evals/evals.json

Workflow

  1. Bind claim to engagement/scope reference, authorization window, exclusions, and expected observation.
  2. Preflight host controls: tool allowlist, credential source, filesystem, network, logging, and cancellation.
  3. Choose safe offline analysis or authorized runtime validation; do not cross scope.
  4. Observe once within bounds, capture redacted evidence, and record time, source, limitations, and owner.
  5. Assign exactly one finding_status: confirmed, suspected, blocked, not-tested, or false-positive; describe offline scope separately, never invent a status.
  6. Stop on expiry, drift, unsafe impact, missing control, or operator stop; route results to independent review.

Rules

  • No exploit scripts, operational attack commands, real targets, malware, exfiltration, or credential collection.
  • Unsupported runtime blocks live validation. Every blocked response must also offer safe offline plan review or analysis of supplied synthetic/redacted artifacts; do not imply that this fallback executed live validation or collected new evidence.
  • Never claim efficacy, compliance, or authorization from a validation result.
  • Do not invent observations, timestamps, approvals, runtime attestation or evidence references. With no supplied/exercised evidence, record not-tested; label examples illustrative, never completed validation.
  • Use artifacts/security-review.md for a continuous security-review chain. Validation records carry engagement_scope_ref, skill_version, source, observed_at, finding_status, evidence_refs, limitations, and accountable_owner.

Anti-Patterns

  • No scope probing: Do not discover beyond approved boundaries.
  • No control bypass: Missing runtime support is a blocker.
  • No clean-by-default: Missing evidence is not a pass.
  • No self-promotion: Require independent adjudication.

References

Gespeicherte Skills