Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Design und Kreativität · SKILL.md

book-toc-lab

book-toc-lab

Design and pressure-test useful nonfiction book promises, scopes, recommendation loops, and takeaway-first tables of contents before drafting. Use when planning, outlining, scoping, restructuring, validating, or testing a practical book, guide, manual, course-like book, or other reader-outcome-focused long-form nonfiction.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: book-toc-lab description: Design and pressure-test useful nonfiction book promises, scopes, recommendation loops, and takeaway-first tables of contents before drafting. Use when planning, outlining, scoping, restructuring, validating, or testing a practical book, guide, manual, course-like book, or other reader-outcome-focused long-form nonfiction. license: MIT compatibility: Codex, Claude Code, and other Agent Skills-compatible clients. metadata: version: "0.1.0" displayName: Book TOC Lab category: Writing tags: writing,books,nonfiction,outlining,toc

Book TOC Lab

Treat a useful nonfiction book as a problem-solving product for a specific reader. The table of contents is the product design, not a decorative outline. Build and test the promise, scope, recommendation loop, and TOC before drafting so the manuscript has a clear job and useful progression.

Use this skill to produce or improve a book plan that answers:

  • Who is this book for?
  • What painful or valuable problem does it help them solve?
  • What should be different for the reader after each chapter?
  • What does the book deliberately leave out?
  • Why would a satisfied reader recommend it to a specific person in a specific situation?

Resource Routing

Load only the files needed for the task:

NeedRead
Core model, DEEP, promise, scope, recommendation loopreferences/core/knowledge.md
Concrete planning and validation rulesreferences/core/rules.md
Before/after examples for scope and TOC titlesreferences/core/examples.md
Quick planning and review checklistreferences/core/checklist.md
Step-by-step TOC design before draftingworkflows/design-toc.md
Step-by-step TOC validation with readersworkflows/validate-toc.md

Fast Workflow

  1. Lock the reader promise before outlining.
  2. Define in-scope, out-of-scope, prerequisites, and depth lines.
  3. Write the recommendation story: trigger, recommender, recommended reader, and why this book is the obvious fit.
  4. Draft chapters as reader takeaways, not author topic buckets.
  5. Order chapters by reader progress: orientation, foundation, action, judgment, and integration.
  6. Pressure-test every chapter against the promise, reader outcome, missing steps, boredom risk, confusion risk, skepticism, and recommendability.
  7. Validate the TOC before drafting when practical.

Output Format

When asked to create or improve a TOC, return:

  1. Book brief: reader, problem, promise, scope, out-of-scope.
  2. Recommendation story: trigger, recommender, recommended reader, why this book.
  3. Recommended TOC with chapter-level reader problems and takeaways.
  4. Reader journey notes explaining the order.
  5. Risk list: missing prerequisites, vague chapters, likely confusion, likely boredom.
  6. Validation plan: 3-7 concrete ways to test the TOC before drafting.

Quality Bar

A good TOC should feel useful even before the book exists. A reader should be able to scan it and understand what the book helps them accomplish, whether it is for them, and why the chapter sequence makes sense.

Do not optimize for literary cleverness before usefulness. Clever titles are acceptable only after the reader promise and chapter takeaways are obvious.

Gespeicherte Skills