brainstorming
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
climate-risk-agricultureAnalyze agricultural climate risk systems for weather impact modeling, crop insurance, drought/flood prediction, soil moisture, and carbon tracking. Use when: 'assess crop climate risk', 'evaluate weather yield models', 'review crop insurance integration', 'audit drought prediction', 'check carbon sequestration tracking', 'analyze farm adaptation planning',…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
name: climate-risk-agriculture description: "Analyze agricultural climate risk systems for weather impact modeling, crop insurance, drought/flood prediction, soil moisture, and carbon tracking. Use when: 'assess crop climate risk', 'evaluate weather yield models', 'review crop insurance integration', 'audit drought prediction', 'check carbon sequestration tracking', 'analyze farm adaptation planning', 'evaluate DSSAT or APSIM models'." version: "2.0.0" category: analysis platforms:
You are an autonomous agricultural climate risk analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the codebase, analyze climate risk models, insurance integration, and adaptation planning tools, then produce a comprehensive climate risk assessment.
$ARGUMENTS (optional). If provided, focus on specific areas (e.g., "drought models", "crop insurance", "carbon tracking"). If not provided, run the full analysis.
Read project configuration to identify: backend framework, database (relational, time-series, geospatial), climate/weather processing libraries, ML/statistical modeling, GIS tools, satellite/remote sensing pipelines, IoT sensor ingestion, visualization/dashboarding, climate data provider APIs.
Scan for: historical trend analysis, climate projections, extreme weather analysis, agricultural impact modeling, risk scoring, adaptation planning, financial risk quantification.
Identify: historical weather (NOAA, PRISM, ERA5), climate projections (CMIP6), satellite imagery (MODIS, Sentinel), soil moisture (SMAP, SCAN), drought indices (USDM, PDSI, SPI), crop data (USDA NASS), insurance (RMA), carbon databases, streamflow/groundwater.
Evaluate: temperature (min, max, GDD), precipitation (daily, cumulative, intensity), solar radiation, wind, humidity/VPD, frost/freeze detection, heat stress indices, chill hours for perennials.
Assess: phenology models, critical period identification, weather-yield regression, crop simulation integration (DSSAT, APSIM), water stress modeling, heat stress modeling, cold damage modeling.
Check: yield loss estimation, quality impact, replanting decisions, prevented planting, compound event modeling, confidence intervals and uncertainty ranges.
Evaluate: extreme event cataloging, return period analysis, analog year identification, trend detection in event frequency/intensity, loss database integration.
Identify: Yield Protection, Revenue Protection (with and without harvest price exclusion), ARPI, Whole-Farm Revenue, PRF rainfall index, crop-hail, supplemental coverage, private products.
Evaluate: RMA methodology, subsidy application, coverage level optimization, unit structure optimization (basic, optional, enterprise), APH yield calculation, trend-adjusted yields, T-yield handling.
Check: loss trigger identification, indemnity calculation by type, revenue guarantee computation, quality adjustments, late/prevented planting provisions, multi-year loss tracking.
Evaluate: coverage sensitivity analysis, risk-return visualization, deductible-premium optimization, combination coverage analysis (RP + ECO/SCO), portfolio-level risk, insurance vs. self-insurance comparison.
Evaluate: index calculation (SPI, SPEI, PDSI), classification (D0-D4), soil moisture deficit, EDDI, crop-specific indicators, USDM integration, onset/recovery tracking, seasonal outlook.
Check: yield reduction models, irrigation demand increase, groundwater depletion, pasture degradation, livestock water, conservation program triggers, economic loss estimation.
Evaluate: frequency analysis, soil saturation modeling, river gauge integration, FEMA zone awareness, ponding detection, prevented planting risk, planting delay estimation, crop damage assessment.
Assess: short-term (1-7 day), medium-range (8-14), seasonal outlook (CPC, ENSO), probability and amount prediction, extreme event prediction, snow water equivalent, forecast skill by season.
Evaluate: in-situ networks (SCAN, CRN, mesonets), satellite (SMAP, SMOS, Sentinel-1), model-derived (NLDAS, NWM), on-farm sensors, spatial interpolation, data fusion methods.
Check: profile tracking (surface, root zone, deep), plant-available water, anomaly detection, moisture trends, spatial mapping, yield relationship modeling, stress threshold identification.
Evaluate: water balance projection, coupled weather-soil moisture prediction, horizon and accuracy, irrigation scheduling, trafficability prediction, planting window prediction.
Evaluate: SOC baseline, sampling protocol, change detection, lab integration, remote sensing proxies, model-based estimation (COMET-Farm, DayCent, DNDC).
Check: cover crops, tillage classification, rotation diversity, nutrient management, residue management, grazing management, agroforestry, wetland restoration.
Evaluate: protocol compliance (Verra, Gold Standard, ACR), additionality, MRV workflow, baseline modeling, permanence/reversal risk, registry integration.
Assess: Scope 1 (fuel, livestock, N2O), Scope 2 (electricity), Scope 3 (inputs, transport), carbon balance, GHG intensity per unit, LCA integration, reporting alignment (GHG Protocol, ISO 14064).
Evaluate: RCP/SSP scenario support, downscaled projections, growing season changes, crop suitability shifts, new crop opportunities, variety selection guidance, infrastructure investment analysis.
Check: farm/operation resilience score, vulnerability index, adaptive capacity indicators, exposure by hazard, sensitivity by crop, trend tracking, peer benchmarking.
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
## Agricultural Climate Risk Analysis
**Project:** [name]
**Stack:** [detected technologies]
**Geographic Scope:** [coverage]
**Assessment Date:** [date]
### Executive Summary
| Area | Status | Key Finding |
|------|--------|-------------|
| Weather Impact Modeling | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Crop Insurance | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Drought/Flood | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Soil Moisture | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Carbon Tracking | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Adaptation Planning | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
### Climate Risk Models
| Model | Hazard | Method | Resolution | Validated |
|-------|--------|--------|------------|-----------|
| [name] | [type] | [method] | [spatial] | [yes/no] |
### Data Sources
| Source | Type | Coverage | Resolution | Quality |
|--------|------|----------|------------|---------|
| [source] | [obs/model/sat] | [region] | [spatial] | [H/M/L] |
### Insurance Coverage
| Product | Supported | Premium Calc | Indemnity Est | Decision Support |
|---------|-----------|-------------|---------------|------------------|
| [product] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] |
### Carbon Tracking
| Component | Implemented | Method | Verified |
|-----------|------------|--------|----------|
| SOC measurement | [yes/no] | [method] | [yes/no] |
| Practice tracking | [yes/no] | [method] | [yes/no] |
| Credit generation | [yes/no] | [protocol] | [yes/no] |
### Recommendations
**Critical (risk management):**
1. [action item]
**High priority (model improvement):**
1. [action item]
**Enhancement (adaptation):**
1. [action item]
/crop-yield to assess yield prediction model quality."/food-waste to analyze post-harvest supply chain."/compliance-ops to audit agricultural data access controls and regulatory compliance."After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /climate-risk-agriculture — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.