Die Oberfläche ist lokalisiert; Skill-Beschreibungen und -Dokumente werden per KI automatisch in Ihre Sprache übersetzt. Code, Befehle, Pfade und Fachbegriffe bleiben im Original, maßgeblich ist das Dokument des Autors.
Skills entdecken
Entwicklung · SKILL.md

witness-prep-ethics

witness-prep-ethics

Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible preparation from prohibited coaching. Use when planning deposition or trial prep, reviewing proposed prep activities, or checking witness coaching ethics. Triggers: witness prep, deposition prep, coaching ethi…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill-Dokumentation

GitHub

name: witness-prep-ethics language: en description: >- Evaluates witness preparation activities for ethical compliance under ABA Formal Opinion 508 and Model Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4. Distinguishes permissible preparation from prohibited coaching. Use when planning deposition or trial prep, reviewing proposed prep activities, or checking witness coaching ethics. Triggers: witness prep, deposition prep, coaching ethics, ABA 508, testimony preparation.

Witness Preparation Ethics Boundaries

Defines lawful witness preparation boundaries and compliance workflow under ABA guidance and Model Rules. Core principle: preparation is expected, but truth is the touchstone—genuine recollection must be preserved.

Prerequisites

  1. Jurisdiction and governing ethics rules (state bar, local court orders).
  2. Witness type and setting (fact or expert; deposition, hearing, trial).
  3. Core materials: pleadings, key documents, prior statements, discovery responses.
  4. Any in-court communication limits (Geders, Perry).

Authority Baseline

SourceConstraint
Model Rule 3.3No false evidence or testimony (candor to tribunal)
Model Rule 3.4No falsifying evidence or counseling false testimony
Model Rule 8.4No dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation
ABA Formal Op. 508 (2023)Preparation expected but must preserve genuine recollection
Restatement (Third) Law Governing Lawyers §116Preparation allowed; no coaching to fabricate or alter
Local ethics opinionsFollow stricter local rule when applicable

Permissible vs. Prohibited

AreaPermissibleProhibited
ProcedureExplain mechanics, oath, objections, transcript—
DocumentsReview to refresh recollectionUse documents to override memory
RecollectionAsk what witness remembers; test basis and confidenceSupply facts or fill gaps
Legal relevanceExplain claims and why topics matterInstruct how to shape testimony
Anticipated topicsIdentify likely areas; practice Q&AProvide preferred answers
ExpressionSuggest clearer wording; avoid jargonChange substance by rephrasing
DemeanorAdvise calm, listen fully, ask for clarification—
CoordinationPrepare witnesses separatelyAlign stories across witnesses

Session Workflow

  1. State purpose: truthful, complete testimony is required.
  2. Cover procedure and demeanor guidance.
  3. Review documents to refresh memory, then test recollection.
  4. Elicit narrative in witness's own words.
  5. Practice anticipated topics with neutral prompts.
  6. Correct clarity issues without changing substance.
  7. Run ethics checklist; obtain witness confirmation.

Unfavorable Recollection Protocol

Required: Accept recollection as stated. Advise truthful testimony. Adjust case strategy.

Allowed: Explore basis and confidence level. Check for question misunderstanding. Review documents to test memory without pressure.

Forbidden: Pressure to change truthful recollection. Suggest recollection is wrong because harmful. Coach to minimize or hide unfavorable facts.

Gray-Area Tests

  • After document review, does witness have present recollection or only adoption of the document?
  • Are you clarifying expression without changing substance?
  • Are you explaining legal relevance without instructing how to answer?
  • Would you be comfortable with the prep transcript before a disciplinary committee?

Ethics Checklist

Permissible:

  • Explain procedure and roles
  • Review documents to refresh memory
  • Ask witness to describe recollection
  • Explain legal significance of topics
  • Identify anticipated topics and practice questions
  • Suggest clearer expression of witness's own recollection
  • Advise on demeanor and non-substantive behavior

Prohibited:

  • Suggest facts the witness does not recall
  • Tell the witness what happened
  • Coach false or misleading testimony
  • Share other witnesses' testimony to align stories
  • Pressure witness to change truthful testimony
  • Use documents to override genuine recollection

Neutral Prompt Templates

"Tell me what you remember about [event]."
"What is the basis for that memory?"
"Does this document refresh your recollection, or are you relying only on what it says?"
"Please answer in your own words, even if the answer is not helpful to our case."
"If you do not know or do not recall, say so."

Guidelines

  • Apply the stricter rule when state or local guidance is more restrictive.
  • Never show or summarize other witnesses' testimony to a witness.
  • If you know testimony is false, follow Model Rule 3.3 remediation duties.
  • Document preparation steps to show compliance if challenged.

Cross-References

  • deposition-witness-prep-session
  • deposition-deponent-coaching
  • deposition-preparation
Gespeicherte Skills