executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
settlement-license-agreementDrafts a dual-purpose Settlement and License Agreement resolving IP litigation while establishing an ongoing licensing framework. Covers mutual releases, covenants not to sue, IP license grants, royalty structures, confidentiality, indemnification, and post-termination rights. Use when drafting IP settlement agreements, litigation resolution with license-ba…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
name: settlement-license-agreement language: en description: Drafts a dual-purpose Settlement and License Agreement resolving IP litigation while establishing an ongoing licensing framework. Covers mutual releases, covenants not to sue, IP license grants, royalty structures, confidentiality, indemnification, and post-termination rights. Use when drafting IP settlement agreements, litigation resolution with license-back provisions, or combined release-and-license instruments. tags:
Drafts an agreement that simultaneously resolves IP litigation and establishes a licensing framework between the parties.
| Element | Content |
|---|---|
| Parties | Full legal names, entity types, organization jurisdictions, addresses, signing capacity |
| Dispute history | Case numbers, courts, claims asserted, IP at issue |
| Recital narrative | Context sufficient for a third party to understand what was settled and why |
| Mutual intent | Desire to resolve disputes and establish licensing relationship |
Define all key terms on first use. At minimum:
| Component | Requirements |
|---|---|
| Mutual general release | Scope: all claims asserted or assertable; extend to affiliates, successors, assigns; carve out obligations under this agreement |
| Covenant not to sue | Additional layer beyond the release |
| Litigation dismissal | Stipulated dismissal with prejudice; specify timeline and filing responsibility |
| Survival | Release must survive license termination — draft explicit language |
| Parameter | Address |
|---|---|
| IP type | Patents (by number), trademarks (by reg. no. + common law), copyrights, trade secrets, know-how |
| Exclusivity | Exclusive, non-exclusive, or sole |
| Field of use | Product categories, industries, applications |
| Territory | Geographic scope |
| Duration | Term of years, perpetual, or patent life |
| Sublicensing | Permitted? Sublicense survival on termination? |
| Improvements | Included? Derivative ownership? Grant-back provisions? |
Distinguish settlement consideration from license royalties — different tax treatment.
Settlement payments:
Ongoing royalties:
| Party | Representations |
|---|---|
| Mutual | Authority to enter agreement; no conflict with existing obligations |
| Licensor | Ownership of licensed IP; right to grant license; no known third-party infringement (knowledge qualifier) |
| Licensee | Ability to perform obligations; compliance with applicable laws |
Indemnification: scope of covered claims, notice requirements, control of defense, liability caps, consequential damages exclusion, "as-is" disclaimer where appropriate.
| Provision | Settlement Component | License Component |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | Irrevocable on execution | Defined term or perpetual |
| Termination triggers | N/A | Material breach, non-payment, bankruptcy |
| Cure period | N/A | 30 days written notice (standard) |
| Post-termination | Release survives | Cease use, wind-down period, inventory sell-off |
| Surviving provisions | Release, confidentiality | Audit rights, accrued payments |
Critical: License termination must NOT revive settled claims.
| Step | Timeframe |
|---|---|
| Executive negotiation | 15–30 days |
| Mediation | 30–60 days |
| Binding arbitration or litigation | Per rules selected |
Specify: governing law, venue/arbitration seat, arbitration rules (AAA, JAMS, ICC), prevailing party fee-shifting, jury trial waiver (if litigation path), whether settlement vs. license disputes use different mechanisms.