---

name: lang-writing-style description: Use when polishing the prose and house style of a Language (LSA) manuscript so it reads for a general linguistics audience and conforms to the Language Style Sheet / Unified Style Sheet for Linguistics. Language prizes analysis legible across frameworks and subfields; jargon and single-formalism prose lose readers. Polishes and conforms; it does not build the argument.

Writing Style & House Style (lang-writing-style)

Language is read across the whole discipline, so its prose bar is legibility across subfields and frameworks: a syntactician should follow a phonology paper's argument, and vice versa. The journal also has a specific citation and formatting house style — the Language Style Sheet, closely tied to the Unified Style Sheet for Linguistics Journals — that differs from APA, Chicago, or a subfield's local habits. This skill polishes the writing and conforms the mechanics; it does not build the argument (that is lang-theory-building).

When to trigger

• Polishing a draft before submission
• A reader said the paper is "only readable by [framework] people" or "buried the claim"
• Converting citations/references to Language house style
• Tightening a General Research Article toward or under the length bar

Write for the whole discipline

• Front-load the claim. By the end of the introduction the reader should know the generalization, the analysis, its key prediction, and why a linguist outside the subfield should care.
• Gloss your jargon. Define framework-specific terms on first use; give the theory-neutral statement of the pattern before the formal one, so the data are legible without the formalism.
• Let the numbered example carry the point. Prose should set up and interpret examples, not restate them; refer to data by example number.
• Earn the length. A General Research Article is capped at 18,000 words and held to a stricter bar past 12,000; cut throat-clearing, redundant derivations, and literature-for-coverage.

Language house style (verify on the Style Sheet)

• Citations: author-date, in the Unified/Language Style Sheet form — e.g., in-text (Author 2020:145), and a reference list with the Style Sheet's punctuation and capitalization (sentence-style article titles, full journal names, page ranges).
• Examples and glosses: numbered, Leipzig-glossed (see lang-tables-figures).
• Terminology and symbols: consistent IPA; grammatical labels in small caps; language names and ISO 639-3 codes where helpful.
• Notes: footnotes for substantive asides, kept lean; do not offload the argument into notes.

Conform the mechanics (checklist)

• In-text citations and reference list in Unified/Language Style Sheet form (not APA/Chicago)
• Numbered examples with aligned Leipzig glosses; abbreviations listed
• Jargon defined on first use; theory-neutral statement precedes the formal one
• Claim and prediction stated in the introduction, not deferred to the conclusion
• Consistent IPA and small-caps labels; language names/codes correct
• Within the section's word limit; length earned

Referee-pushback patterns on prose (Language fixes)

Referee writes…	The Language-specific fix
"Impenetrable to non-[framework] readers."	give the theory-neutral generalization first; gloss terms
"The contribution is buried."	front-load the claim and prediction in the intro
"References not in journal style."	convert to the Unified/Language Style Sheet form
"Padded / over the bar."	cut coverage citations and redundant derivations

Calibration (Language voice, hedged)

Reflects Language's house and readership, not universal rules; confirm wording on the Style Sheet. The most common avoidable style failure is prose that assumes the reader already lives inside your formalism — a general reader bounces off undefined notation. The second is mis-applied citation style (APA/Chicago instead of the Unified/Language Style Sheet). Illustrative: a Minimalist syntax paper opens with three pages of framework machinery before any data; the fix leads with the descriptive generalization and a glossed example, defers the formal derivation, and reformats 60 references from APA into Style Sheet form — the same analysis, now legible to a semanticist or a typologist.

Anti-patterns

• Prose readable only by insiders of one framework (undefined notation, no theory-neutral statement)
• Burying the claim until the discussion section
• APA/Chicago/subfield-local citation style instead of the Unified/Language Style Sheet
• Offloading the real argument into dense footnotes
• Padding to look comprehensive, pushing a General Research Article past the earned length

Output format

【Reads across subfields】claim + example legible to an outsider? [Y/N]
【Front-loaded】claim + prediction in the intro? [Y/N]
【House style】Unified/Language Style Sheet citations + refs? [Y/N]
【Glossing/IPA】examples and symbols conform? [Y/N]
【Length】within the section cap, earned? [Y/N]
【Next】lang-submission

Supplementary resources

• ../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers, CSL styles, glossing tools
• ../../resources/official-source-map.md — Language Style Sheet / Unified Style Sheet source